WHAT IS THE BIBLE? (No. 1)

What do we mean by the BIBLE? Most everyone in anycivilized land has heard of this book, but comparatively fewhave ever taken the time and put forth the effort to find outwhat it really is and where it came from. From the earliestyears of knowledge we have known of the Bible, and mostof us have a respect for its name, but because the majoritydo not know what it really is, they never make it a part oftheir life.

In this series of studies we hope to point out some factsthat will establish a regard for the authority of the Biblethat will allow it to become the guide in life. It is alreadyused in some ways in most phases of American life. Recordsof birth, marriages, and deaths are written in it and keptall through life. At weddings it is used as a kind of symbolof sacredness in being carried by the bride. It is read fromin "performing" the ceremony. At funerals it is read fromand talked about. When new government officers take theiroffices, it is used upon which to take oaths. In courts it isused to swear in witnesses. In literature it is a basis for many poems, stories, essays, etc. In music it is used to inspire lyrics. It is often used in daily conversation. Why is the Bible used in this way instead of other books? Itmust have a profound influence upon the lives of men ingeneral to be used in this way. This is one reason why weshould learn what the Bible really is.

WHY WE NEED A THOROUGH STUDY OF THE BIBLE

There are many reasons why we should study about theBible and study the Bible, but we will confine ourselves tothree major reasons: (1) It is the rule of life; (2) It is theeducation into the purpose of life; (3) It is the means ofanswering all questions of doubt.

One of the most interesting studies in which one can engage himself is the study of the origin of the Bible. Oureternal hope depends upon our faith in God and His promises. Our faith depends upon that word which God hasrevealed unto us. All we have of this word of God is in what we call the BIBLE. This book which we now have is a trans

lation of the original tongue by which inspired men of old revealed God's will to man. It is interesting to search back through the evidences and facts of past centuries and reassure ourselves in this Book we call the Bible.

STUDY IT AS THE RULE OF LIFE

We need to study this book because it is generally accepted as the rule of life. Even the most unlearned in the Bible often try to prove the right way of life by appealing to the Bible. Why would one do this unless he believed it tobe the rule of life ?

Business men have been known to use this book to establish the right relationship between employee and employer. It is used in dealing with relationships between business men and their customers. Rulers and officers of nations have used it in guiding the course of making andenforcing laws. The courts have used it in deciding cases. Almost every phase of life has in some way been influencedby the dictates of this book we call the Bible. If it is so important in all these phases of every day living, shouldwe not study it and learn the real basis of life? The onlytrue foundation for Christian activity, and the only truebasis for all human relationships, is the Bible. This meansthat all errors are exposed by the Bible. One can be properly censured by using it as a guide. It is also profitable for correction. When one is reproved for some wrong, the Biblemay be successfully used in setting him right. The Bible may be used to instruct any man in the way of righteousness. When this book is used in the proper way.the end will be that the man of God will be made "perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works." Whatgreater guide could one find to completely set a man to doevery good work ? That is the reason why we should studythe Bible as the rule of life.

Besides giving us the way that leads to every good work,this Book tells us how to get into the way of real living. Itteaches us the plan of salvation, by which everyone can befreed from all past sins and be made a new creature inChrist. There is not a book on the face of the earth that can claim to do this for anyone except this Book we are nowstudying.

STUDY IT FOR THE EDUCATION INTO LIFE ITSELF

The Bible not only serves as the major rule of life, it alsoeducates man as to his origin, purpose and destiny. Theseare three of the mo3t important questions any man couldask. They are questions that cannot be answered to satisfaction without the Bible. If the Bible account of myorigin is not right, how would I go about proving any other?No science known to man has ever been able to produceone single bit of evidence that man originated in any otherway than the account given in the Bible. Why is man placed upon this earth? I can never really know without therevelation of the Bible. I must know what this book teaches to know why I am alive and to be able to enjoy the things pre

pared for me. Where am I going when I leave this earth ? Ihave no idea without the revelations of the Bible. No bit of information has ever been established by any branch ofscience regarding the destiny of man. Only the Bible tellsus. We therefore ought to study it in earnest to informourselves on the matter of life.

(To be continued)

QUESTIONS FOR ARNOLD HARDIN

Elsewhere in this issue will be found a short response from Arnold Hardin to J. T. Smith. We believe brother Smith's work in this exchange stands on its own. But since brother Hardin directs some statements to me, I shall comment on the matter this time and raise some questions which will help to clarify the matter once and for all. Brother Hardin complains that we have misrepresented him. It is not our intention to do so and these questions will help determine whether or not that is the case.

Neither J. T. Smith nor I are now on the mailinglist for the bulletin brother Hardin edits and in which the objectionable material is found. We were both on that list until we began to raise some questions about what he was writing in issue after issue. In fact, it seems that the best way to get OFF his listis to openly criticize what he has openly said! But we did receive it for a long time and read article after article in which he wrote on law, faith, grace, works, righteousness, sins of ignorance, divine clemency and "legalism." In these articles he wrote as one who was out to put the whole brotherhood straight on these subjects and suggested a number of times that manybrethren were not teaching the truth on these subjects. Once he said, "Bless our hearts, we are determined to be saved by works." I deny that faithful gospel preachers have generally neglected to preach on the grace of God or that they believe orteach salvation by works of human merit. Neither do I believe very many gospel preachers are "legalists." Brother Hardin has printed comments from readers who revel in the fact that he has been saying what they thought they would never hear a gospel preacherhave the courage to say. I must confess that I never thought I would hear one say some of the things he has, either. None of us object to brother Hardin, or anyone else, teaching what the word of God says on these questions. It is my conviction that he has taught some things which are not true and has laid down premises which lead to far-reaching, erroneous consequences—hence, the articles which have appeared in this paper about this matter.

Brother Hardin, will you forthrightly answer thesequestions?

(1) Is salvation by grace conditional or un conditional? (2) If it is conditional, then does compliance with divine conditions nullify grace? (3) Is faith the only condition of salvation? (4) Is baptism a work performed by man? (5) Is it legalistic to teach that one must obey the terms of the gospel (including baptism) or that an erring child of God must repent to be forgiven andsaved? (6) Is the personal righteousness of Jesus Christimputed to the sinner? (7) Do you believe that the grace of God will cause Him to overlook sins of ignorance? Do you believedivine clemency will cover these? If so, would you include instrumental music and institutionalism under such sins of ignorance? (8) In your sermon in Texas, from which J. T. Smith quoted in the December issue, you raised thequestion of the man who is on his way to be baptized when a tree falls on him and accused your brethren ofjudging. Then you said "surely I worship a God tonight whose grace is extended to that man. I wouldn't lose an ounce of sleep with respect to his death, a minute." Does this not clearly imply that God will accept the intention for the act? Does one HAVE to be baptized to be saved? Or do you believeSOME will be saved who have not actually been baptized? If so, upon what passage of scripture do you base this conclusion? (9) Do you know of any passage of scripture which promises that an unrepentant child of God will be saved? (10) When you write about salvation not being bya system of law keeping, do you mean to exclude the law of Christ? (11) Are you in sympathy with the writings of Carl Ketcherside and Edward Fudge on these matters? Have you not strongly opposed the articles in severalpapers which have exposed their views as erroneous?

We would remind brother Hardin that these are not hard questions. They cry for answers. His responseto them in a clear and forceful manner will go a long way toward clarifying his views. If we have misrepresented him, then here is his opportunity toset the record straight. We urge him to do so. We do not intend to keep the columns of this paper open for an unending battle over this subject or any other. Let's get it settled and go on to other things. We await his response. Nothing would give us more pleasure than to learn that we are mistaken about his views. He has done much good work in the past. We regret that his writings of more recent times have placed him under such a cloud. We urge him to help us lift the cloud and let truth prevail.

JULY SPECIAL ON "BRINGING INTHE SHEAVES"

Our special for July this year will be a serious effort to stir Christians everywhere to get the seed out of the barn and into the field. Not nearly enough is being done to reach the lost with the message of truth. Too many are willing to leave this work in the hands of a few preachers. Congregations of 300-400 or more people are reporting 8 or 10 baptisms for a whole year's work. What a scandal that is! We are

hopeful that this special issue will help to get morebrethren involved in the work God gave us all to do.These subjects will be discussed by the writers indicated: The Harvest Is Plenteous — H. E. Phillips Bringing in the Sheaves — Connie W. Adams The Sower of the Seed — Thomas G. O'Neal The Seed Or the Sack? — J. R. Snell Soils for the Seed — Marshall

E. Patton But the Laborers Are Few — J. Wiley Adams One on One — Ken Green Roadblocks to Reaping — Weldon E. Warnock Self-Starters to SoulWinning — J. T. Smith Lord, Send Me — James P.Miller We hope brethren everywhere will find use forthis material and that because of it there will be a greater harvest. Advance orders should be sent to: SEARCHING THE SCRIPTURES, P.O. Box 68, Brooks, KY 40109. The price will be $40 per

100.

This is a strange exchange. In Smith's first article he charged me with believing SEVEN completelyfalse and slanderous errors. I deny EACH ANDEVERY ONE! All the writing I have done labelseach as TOTALLY FALSE. Yet—he says: "I stillcharge that my statements concerning brother Hardinare true." Where is his proof? I do not know whether his actions are deliberate, or grow out of ignorance,though I have very strong feelings in this matter.

Smith knows he cannot scripturally refute what I have written and so he responds by saying, "ButMUST we obey in order to be saved'? That is thequestion." What an absurd dodge! My writings showthe affirmative of that question as you now wellknow. He dodges faster than a Texas Jack Rabbitfleeing a Greyhound!

The Editor of STS joins in by saying, "Thecontents thereof have given out an uncertain sound. .." In a letter to me the Editor says, "I do not believe you have taught the truth on several subjects." Therefore I would like to make a fair proposition to either or both of these brethren. SinceSmith refuses to examine what I have written I challenge either or both of you to a fundamentalstudy of these matters as related to LAW— WORKS; GRACE—FAITH. I have no more timeto waste on quibbles—GO TO THE LAW ANDTESTIMONY. You men have charged me with theworst of errors—I challenge you to prove them! I amready to respond to every charge for I believe I havewritten truth. Then Smith's dodge relative to a man and the tree falling on him will be dealt with inits proper setting and time. It is far easier to prejudice the minds of people than to meet head onthe real and fundamental issues.

I believe that Smith knows I do not believe the errors attributed to me. I call upon him and theEditor to retract these charges! These men believe that just one unforgiven sin (for whatsoever reason)will keep one out of heaven. Brethren you are guilty of SEVEN FALSE ACCUSATIONS against a brother. WILL YOU LEAVE IT STANDING OR REPENT?

2920 Prairie Crk.

Dallas, Texas 75227

THE LORD'S SUPPER ON SUNDAY NIGHT

QUESTION: I would like to know why some oppose the Lord's supper at night and if their objection is valid.—Q.M.

ANSWER: There are two primary objections onthe part of some who oppose the observance of theLord's supper at night. 1) It is contended that the"day" of Acts 20:7 is the Hebrew day (from sunset tosunset), hence, after 6 P.M. on Sunday is no longerthe "day" authorized. 2) It is contended that the whole body (at least intentionally) must jointlyparticipate in the observance. Hence, to provide for asecond observance, and especially one designed foronly a part or segment of the body, is not onlywithout authority but also contravenes the scripturaldemands. These are the basic objections.

The "Day of Acts 20:7

The expression "the first day of the week" translates literally " 'one of sabbaths,' signifying 'the first day of the week' " (W. E. Vine). And howdoes this meaning come about from this literal translation? The world "Sabbaton" (Sabbaths) identifies that period of time from Sabbath to Sabbath, which divides itself into seven equal divisions of twenty four hours or one full week divided into seven equal parts of twenty four hours.Since the Hebrews had no names for these days,they used ordinal numbers in relation to the Sabbath,or the first one seventh of the Sabbaton, which isthe same as "the first day of the week." In the lightof this information, we conclude that the translators have done well to supply the word "day." It should be observed, however, that the period of time here authorized is a twenty four hourday. Now, question: Is this the Hebrew day (fromsunset to sunset) or the Roman day (from midnightto midnight)?

Let us examine the verse and its context. Verse seven says, 1) They came together "upon the firstday of the week," 2) That Paul's plan was "to departon the morrow." It is obvious from v. 7, "continued his speech until midnight," from v. 8, "there were many lights in the upper chamber, where they weregathered together," and from v. 11, "even till breakof day," that this was a night meeting. Since Paul's plan was "to depart on the morrow" and since he did depart at "break of day" (v. 11), there had to be a transition from one day to another during the night—hence, Roman time (from midnight to midnight) .

If it be contended that they assembled and observed the Lord's supper before 6 p.m., and thatPaul's preaching and the other events followed afterwards, let it be observed that such hardlycomports with the conditions and circumstances ofthat time, the facts of the text, and further revelationelsewhere. It has the appearance of forcing a passageto accommodate a prejudicial view. Furthermore, the resurrection day of our Lord (which is the reason forthe observance of the Lord's supper at this time inthe first place) is shown elsewhere to be the Romanday (from midnight to midnight).

The Resurrection Day

"The first day of the week cometh Mary Magdalene early, when it was yet dark, unto the sepulcher, and seeth the stone taken away from thesepulcher . . . Then the same day at evening, beingthe first day of the week, when the doors were shutwhere the disciples were assembled for fear of the Jews, came Jesus and stood in the midst, and saithunto them, Peace be unto you" (Jno. 20:1, 19). W.

E. Vine says that the word translated evening "really signifies the late evening, the latter of two eveningsas reckoned by the Jews, the first from 3 p.m. to sunset, the latter after sunset; this is the usual meaning." While sometimes used with reference to both, the chronology of events of this day (Lk. 24:1,13, 21, 29, 33, 36), including both evenings, demandsthe conclusion in this instance that the late evening ismeant. Therefore, we" have darkness before daylight, the daylight itself, and darkness after sunset—all identified as the same day—the first day of theweek— the resurrection day of our Lord.

Perhaps it should be observed further that the breaking of bread in Acts 20:11 involved no one butPaul. By this (a common meal) he refreshed himselfbefore making his departure.

"Segmental Observance"

The "no class brethren" are guilty of inconsistencywhen they insist upon specific authority for the classarrangement for teaching while at the same time accepting generic authority for other arrangementsfor teaching, e.g., an arrangement whereby the church teaches through the distribution of literature,tracts, radio and T V preaching, home Bible studies, etc. Those who oppose providing the Lord's suppertwice on the same day are guilty of the same basic error, namely, inconsistency. While insisting upon specific authority for a second provision of the Lord'ssupper, they accept generic authority for a second provision for other items of worship on the same day.If the example of Acts 2:7 excludes a second observance for those hindered from the first, then the examples of special meetings (Acts 14:27; 15:30)would likewise exclude a second meeting on the sameday for the same purpose for those hindered from thefirst. Furthermore, on this basis, respect for the examples of assemblies in the New Testament relativeto the number of times in one day would exclude allassemblies on the same day except one. The truth ofthe matter is the law of materiality demands that the number of times in all these items of worship be regarded as irrelevant or immaterial. There is nothingspiritually significant about the number of times. The"day" has spiritual significance—the number of timesdoes not.

It is interesting and perhaps worthy of some notethat some secular scholars say there were two meetings of the early saints on Sunday in some partsof the country—a predawn meeting and a late evening meeting (See The Life And Works Of St. Paul, By F. W. Farrar). R. C. H. Lenski says in hiscommentary on Acts 20:7, "We, indeed, think that amorning service was held at Troas on this Sunday although no mention of it is made by Luke." William Barclay says, "We see that all this happened at night. That is probably so because it was only atnight, when the day's work was done, that slaveswould come to the Christian fellowship." After all,Christianity is flexible enough in the realm of thingsgenerically authorized to adapt itself to the existingsocial conditions of the long ago as well as to thepresent hour.

Two more passages must be considered: 1 Cor. 11:7-34 and 1 Cor. 10:16, 17. In the former, twowrongs are identified: 1) Division, which is illustratedby their separate observance. 2) They observed it unworthily, which is illustrated by their excess or bymaking a gluttonous feast of their observance. To use verse thirty three, "tarry one for another," to condemn separate observance for some reason otherthan division and a sectarian spirit is to misuse theword of God. If we were to apply other passages as loosely, we would have to condemn giving,praying, and fasting that is done in the presenceof others (Matt. 6:1, 5, 16). However, a more careful examination shows such to be wrong onlywhen improperly motivated, namely, "to be seen ofmen." So it is with 1 Cor. 11:33. The separate observance condemned relates to division and a sectarian spirit.

In 1 Cor. 10:16, 17 Paul says, "The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the bloodof Christ? The bread which we break, is it not thecommunion of the body of Christ? For we being many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakersof that one bread." To conclude that the communion

of these verses is limited to a local congregation—hence, the need for the whole bodyjointly participating in one service is to miss thepoint made on communion. Paul wrote from Ephesusto the saints in Corinth and to "All in every place. . ." (1 Cor. 1:2; 11:17, 16:8). Note: "the cup ... . . . which WE bless;" "the bread which WE break;""WE ... are one bread, and one body: for WE areALL partakers of that one bread" (Emphasis MEP).Thus, Paul, the saints at Ephesus, and the saints atCorinth—all were one bread and one body and didjointly partake (have communion) wherever and whenever they properly observed the Lord's supper,whether in one or one hundred assemblies.

BRINGING HIM UP RIGHT

I was recently looking through clippings I had collected over the past year (while trying to clean offmy desk) and I ran across one interesting article fromThe Tennessean, July 2, 1976. It's headline reads: Preacher's Wife Has 6 Children and a Copperhead.

The lady's name is Nellie Pack. She lives near Newport, Tennessee. And she keeps a poisonoussnake in a wooden box of dirt atop her refrigerator.

She doesn't like the snake, "I'm scared to death of them," she said. "I can't even pick up one of those red worms when we go fishing." Yet when she "feelsthe power of the Lord" she is able to put her handsinto the box full of "wriggling, writhing, copperheads, rattlesnakes, cobras and cottonmouths."

In one service, she picked up eight deadly snakes at once.

The Packs (her husband is "pastor" of the HolinessChurch of God in Jesus Name) both believe the Bible,in Mark 16:18, directs true believers to "take up serpents."

They also believe they can drink "any deadly thing" and "it shall not hurt them." Liston Pack's faith wasn't shaken when his brother Buford died in 1973 after drinking strychnine at services in the littlebackwoods church. Liston had a bad experience withthe strychnine too, but he ascribes that to not being anointed by the spirit strongly enough.

What can we say of such Bible ignorance? Wemight say these folks are at least more consistentthan their more sophisticated Pentecostal neighbors.If the signs Jesus promised His disciples in Mk. 16:17-20 are still in force today, then all of us hadbetter cast more than a sympathetic glance at thePacks!

Pentecostals often argue that the "serpents" of thispassage are false teachers. They are to take "false teachers" up in the sense of refuting their teaching.If so, I would think the "deadly poison" would necessarily be false doctrine! They are commanded to drink it!

The sad thing is, they have done just that!

The article on the Packs closes with a descriptionof little David Pack, the youngest of the six children,playing with a garter snake. I suppose they're bringing him up in the church.

IfIt Feels Good . . .

The "new morality" is epitomized by the bumper

sticker, "If it feels good, do it." Those whose consciences still quiver with a little life, usually add,"so long as it doesn't hurt anybody else."

Which brings us to an item reported by the UPIwhich was carried in many newspapers in mid-November of '76. According to this article, policeestimate there are 30,000 sexually abused children inLos Angeles, mostly young boys used byhomosexuals, including $l,000-a-day prostitutes, age

12.

Capt. William J. Riddle, commander of the Juvenile Division in L. A. Said: "It's like a contagiousdisease . . . and it's spreading all over the country."

He couldn't have used a more perfect analogy. Indeed, it is a contagious disease. It's a disease that is called S-I-N. The only cure is the blood of Christ,the gospel of salvation, and a return to the basicvalues that are taught in God's word.

Sgt. Jackie Howell, head of the Child Abuse Unit,described the typical youth as a 14-year-old boy, a runaway from a broken or neglected home with nofather figure, living on the streets and starved forlove.

"It may sound corny," he said, "but when we pickthese kids up, they talk about being wanted andloved."

The word of God has a lot to say about the need tobe wanted and loved too. It would be wonderful, would it not, if people would come to realize that this is justwhat the Doctor (the Great Physician) has ordered(1 Cor. 13).

A fellow once argued with me that homosexualitywould solve the population explosion. "Yes," I countered, "it sure solved Sodom's population explosion!"

A Mixed Up Outfit "A student-faculty group at Louisville's Presbyterian Theological Seminary believes the timehas come to purge sexist language from sermons andofficial religious publications."

So reports Bill Hendrick, Associated Press Writer (Owensboro Messenger-Inquirer, Jan. 3, 1977). Our reaction: If the Presbyterian Church is stupid enoughto swallow such silliness, we couldn't care less.

But the article continues: "There are some places in the Bible where we feel God is more like a mother than like a father ... In those instances, perhaps, he should be called God the Mother . . . The concept isnot to exclude God the Father but to include God the Mother . . . there are many references to God in which traits of forgiveness, tolerance and mercy might appear to be more female than male."

Our reaction? We are saddened, almost beyondwords.

The first thing that entered my mind upon reading the above was: "I've never seen a more sexist statement in my life! This is nothing but perpetuation of the myth that such traits as forgiveness, tolerance and mercy are feminine, not masculine. Will the seminarians now try to tell usthat Jesus was

really a woman because He showed compassion, tenderness, forgiveness, and mercy?

We men need to learn that a man is never more masculine than when he demonstrates such qualities.The manhood of our Lord never towers higher thanwhen we see Him beaten, mocked, spat upon, andcrucified, yet praying, "Father forgive them . . . " Never has the concept, "men shouldn't cry" been more powerfully refuted than in the meaningful words, "Jesus wept."

The Bible does not overlook such qualities in women: "As one whom his mother comforteth, so will I comfort you . . ." (Isa. 65:13). But it emphasizes the same qualities no less in men: "Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieththem that fear him" (Psalm 103:13).

Obviously, these seminarians have a warped senseof manhood. In fact, it is our impression that suchperverted attitudes have provided the major impetusfor the whole "Equal rights" movement.

Boys

The following words were written several years agoby Jean Blackford, and were published in Jan. 7,1977 in the bulletin of the Northside Church of Christ in Dyersburg, Tenn., by Dick Blackford, her son, anda faithful evangelist. Dick's parents are members ofthe church in Owensboro where I preach.

It's my guess that many readers will easily identifywith this bit of poetry:

Bruises, broken bones and bumps Measles,

chicken pox and mumps

Tonsils, adenoids galore

Vaccinations by the score

All these til I'm fairly dizzy

Keeping quick minds ever busy

Settling fights and quieting noise

Thinking "Boys will be boys."

Now that those hectic days are gone

And the times I've felt like quitting,

Do you know what I've gone and done?

I've started baby-sitting!

WHY PREACHERS KEEP PREACHING

The first time I remember hearing about a gospelpreacher who quit preaching to enter secular work, itstruck me with a painful sense of keen disappointment. I had come to regard preaching somewhat like John T. Lewis expressed it back in 1913. "I believe preaching the gospel is not only an'honorable occupation,' or calling, but the highestcalling to which mortal was ever called—not that itplaces the one who preaches it in a sphere above hisfellow-travelers to eternity, but because of the intrinsic value of its design." (Gospel Advocate, April 17, 1913, p.378.)

The preacher who quit said he had been looking for"a way out" and one presented itself. I was a young preacher at the time and could not imagine a gospelpreacher giving up his work for any reason overwhich he had control. I am an older preacher now(much older), but I still cannot accept such news aspreachers quitting without chagrin, although I am resigned to it's happening as a fact of life.

I am aware of the reasons preachers commonly givefor quitting: inadequate support, lack of appreciation,ill-treatment by brethren, long and hard hours, theabsence of a secure future (on earth), being compelled to do the elders' work, etc. I have experienced most, if not all, of these sufficiently to beunderstanding in the matter. I know the terrible burden these things can impose upon a preacher's mental and spiritual outlook. I know the effect theycan have on his family.

There was a time, in the 1950's, when thingslooked especially bleak for many of us. Those who could not go along with the institutional and socialgospel practices that were dominating the churches inmany places were told there would be no place forthem to preach. Of course, I knew better than thatbecause the field is the world and nobody can build aprivate fence around it. But it did seem for a whilethat financial support might be in short supply. Wehad to take a good look at the situation and decidewhat course to take. But if we ever thought ofquitting, even in the darkest days, I do not recall it.

I am in favor of gospel preachers being well-supported, appreciated, respected, and cared for intheir old age. The brethren need to know the preacher's side of the story and I am glad that some are striving to tell it. Congregations and elders should be taught, exhorted, and admonished inregard to their Scriptural obligations to those whopreach the gospel. But there is an ingrainedreluctance on the part of most preachers to do this forfear some will think they are mercenary.

Much of a preacher's work is not visible to the average member of the church and, since he is not sobrash as to give a detailed report each week of whathe does in the service of Christ, many think he haslittle to do. This often contributes to his beingunderpaid, depreciated, and even looked upon as aloafing sponge on a perennial vacation at church expense. This may be part of the price one must payto preach the gospel. But just remember, there is nota single thing suffered by preachers today that didnot come within the experience of Paul. Yet, Paul never talked about quitting.

Where would the church be today if the sacrificing preachers of past generations had felt sorry enough for themselves to quit preaching? Many of the churches that thrive today and thousands of Christians who now enjoy the blessings of liberty inChrist are the enduring work begun by underpaid and mistreated preachers. These men labored under tryingcircumstances, but they kept preaching because theylabored not for "the meat which perisheth" and because they were looking for "a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God."

I do not believe the pioneering spirit of our spiritual forefathers has been totally lost on the present generation of preachers. Faithful proclaimersof the word are still ready to "spend and be spent"for the cause of Christ. They patiently and prayerfully endure abuse from brethren and the world, but they keep on preaching. If conditions are such that they must "make tents" to support themselves and their families, the tent-making issecondary. It does not become the tail that wags thedog. Faithful preachers do not quit. They press onwith full assurance that, as old-timers used to say,"God doesn't settle all His accounts on Saturday."They know that one hour with the blood-washed throng before the throne of God will make it all worth while. No, they don't quit. They don't ever talk about it! Thank God for such men.

SOME THINGS PAUL KNEW

Life is filled with uncertainties. We do not know for sure what tomorrow may bring to our country, oreven to the world. The political, social and economicstructure could change overnight. Some would tell usthat the only thing we know for certain is that we donot know anything for certain. But there are some certainties about which the apostle Paul writes. Letus observe what Paul knew for sure.

A Perfect Savior

Paul knew that he had a perfect Savior. He writes,". . . for I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day" (2 Tim. 1:12). He did not say, "I know what I believe," although this is important (Mk. 4:24). Neither did he say, "Iknow why I believe," although this is important also (1 Pet. 3:15). Rather, he said, "I know whom I have believed." Paul knew Jesus. He knew that Jesus was able. Notice how this word, "able," is used in reference to Jesus. We will briefly consider five passages where the word is used.

(1) Jesus is able to heal. "And when he was come into the house, the blind men came to him: and Jesus saith unto them, Believe ye that I am able to do this?They said unto him, yea, Lord. Then touched he their eyes, saying, According to your faith be it unto you. And their eyes were opened. ..." (Matt. 9:28-30).No case was too hard for Jesus to heal. Jesus has the same power today, but he is not exercising that power. Miracles were temporary. They have ceased (1 Cor. 13:8-13). (2) Jesus is able to save and destroy. "There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy. . . . "(Jas. 4:12). No sin is too heinous for Jesus to pardon, providing the guilty wants forgiveness and will comply with Jesus' terms. He is able to save to the uttermost those who come unto God by him (Heb. 7:25). Those who refuse to come, he also has the power to destroy. (3) Jesus is able to succor. "For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted" (Heb. 2:18). Having suffered the trials and temptations of man, Jesus is able by his example, promises and providential careto help those who are also tempted. (4) Jesus is able to keep our souls. The thought is set forth in 2 Tim. 1:12, already quoted. Jude wrote,

'Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling . . . " (v. 24). So, Jesus is able to keep us safe and secure as long as we stay committed unto him.

(5) Jesus is able to subdue all things. "Who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself" (Phil. 3:21). Since he has the power to subject all things unto himself, certainly the fashioning of our bodies like unto his glorious bodywill be no problem. (6) Another thing Paul knew about Jesus was thathe is faithful. The apostle declares, "Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ" (Col. 3:24). Paul knew that you can depend on whatever Jesus says. Paul told the Corinthians, ". . . ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord" (1 Cor. 15:58). On the other hand, if one is disobedient to the Lord, he shall not escape punishment because Jesus is faithful to his word—he cannot deny himself (2 Tim.2:13).

Yes, Jesus is the perfect Son of God. He lacks nothing. He possesses all knowledge, wisdom and power. He is able to fulfill his promises. Paul knew this. So should we.

Things Work Together

Paul knew that all things work together for good.In the Roman letter, Paul states, "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose" (Rom. 8:28). Some interpret this verse to mean that Paul had learned that all the trials, troubles, heartaches and difficulties of life work together for our good. Though there is good to be derived out of the vicissitudes of life, Paul is not teaching such in this passage.

The scripture has to be interpreted in light of its context. The point seems to be that God's scheme ofredemption works together for our spiritual benefit. The "things" in the text helps those who love God, the ones who love being the same as the called according to his purpose. Those who love God are the persons who keep his word. Jesus said, "He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me. ... " (Jn. 14:21; cf. 1 Jn. 5:3; 2 Jn. 6). Thus, the various elements of the scheme of redemption work together for the enrichment of the children of God.

Looking at the context we see the following things that are involved in the things which work together.The law of the Spirit of life in Christ makes us free from the law of sin and death (v. 2). Here is freedom from sin in Christ by the gospel. In verse 3, the law of Moses could not free man from sin and death, but Jesus accomplished this through his sacrifice for sin.In verse 14, we are led by the Spirit. God's will is made known by the Spirit through revelation. In verses 24-25, we are saved by hope. Hope gives usthe incentive to persevere. In verse 27, intercession is made in heaven for the saints according to the will ofGod. God helps and provides.

All of these things work together for the children ofGod and this Paul knew. The Christian has a lot going for him. May all of us realize it.

Terrible To Be Unprepared

Paul knew it was terrible to meet the Lord unprepared. Listen to the apostle as he writes, "Knowing therefore the terror of the Lord, we persuade men . . ." (2 Cor. 5:11). He had just stated that "we must all appear before the judgmentseat of Christ; that every one may receive the thingsdone in his body according to that he hath done,whether it be good or bad" (v. 10). In view of the judgment and God's judicial wrath, Paul persuadedmen to get right with God.

The apostle Paul, if he be the writer of Hebrews,declared, "For if we sin willfully after that we havereceived the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation. . . . It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the livingGod" (Heb. 10:26, 27, 31).

Hell was no joke with Paul. It was real. How people can deny the reality of hell and yet claim tobelieve the Bible is beyond me. The Bible is filled with teaching on the punishment of the wicked in aplace called, "hell."

Jesus spoke of hell, where the fire is not quenchedand the worm dieth not (Mk. 9:43-48). The cursed atthe judgment will be cast into everlasting fire,prepared for the devil and his angels (Matt. 25:41). The disobedient will go away into everlasting punishment (Matt. 25:46). Paul spoke of indignation,wrath, tribulation and anguish upon every soul thatdoeth evil (Rom. 2:8-9). Peter and Jude said the mistof darkness is reserved for ever for the wicked (2 Pet. 2:17; Jude 13).

Yes, Paul knew about the reality of hell and thatsuch a place awaits those who spurn the grace andmercy of God. His love for the souls of men movedhim to warn them of the wrath of God to come.

Redeemed Have A Home

Paul knew that the redeemed have an eternal home in heaven. He writes, "For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, wehave a building of God, an house not made withhands, eternal in the heavens" (2 Cor. 5:1). There was never any doubt in Paul's mind about the realityof heaven and the faithful saints of God going there.

When Paul came toward the end of his sojourn onearth, he testified, "For I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand. Ihave fought a good fight, I have finished my course,I have kept the faith: Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing" (2 Tim. 4:6-8). The beloved apostle wasconfident as to where he was going when he left thisworld.

This hope of eternal life is comforting and consoling to the Christian. It gives him a fixed purpose

and direction in life. Many are groping in spiritualdarkness, not knowing where they are going. All they know is that they are going, going, going, butwithout any destination. The Christian's goal is that world of beauty, enjoyment, fulfillment and contentment that exists somewhere beyond the farthest star, where God and all of the saved will live forever and forever. Its assurance is the resurrection of Jesus from the dead (1 Pet. 1:3-5).

May our love abound, our faith increase and ourhope brighten to the extent that we can say withPaul that when our earth-life is over, we know "we have a building of God, an house not made withhands, eternal in the heavens."

We have directed your attention to some thingsPaul knew. If we have not already learned what Paulknew, may we readily set our minds in that direction.

DECEPTIVE ARGUMENTATION" NO. 2

This is the second in a series on the above subject.Brother Tom Warren, has recently written a book,"When is an Example Binding?" For the most part Iam in complete agreement with its contents. BrotherWarren has done an excellent job in some of his material. These articles must not be taken as an overall rejection of the book. However, I must in allsincerity, take issue with some of his exegesis as wellas his conclusions. In a previous article, I pointed outthat Mr. Bogard, of Missionary Baptist fame, wasskilled in advocating false exegesis and conclusions.

My first introduction to Thomas Warren was on January 20, 1951. I had just finished a debate withMr. John Kesner, Missionary Baptist preacher, in Ft. Smith, Arkansas. Mr. Kesner had lived in Ft. Smithfor over twenty years and was well known. After the printing of the debate, I received numerous ordersand comments on the discussion, among which wasthis letter from Brother Warren: "Dear brother Hogland, I appreciate your interest in public defenseof the truth of God's word. Keep up the good work.Please send me a copy of your debate with Kesner. I enclose one dollar. If you ever come this way, comeby to see us. Sincerely, Your brother, Tom Warren,3024 N. Houston, St., Ft. Worth, Texas". Well, a lotof water has passed under the bridge since that coldday in January 1951. I like to think, at that timeTom and I were walking hand in hand. In his letter Tom said, he appreciated my interest in DEFENDING the truth and encouraged me to keepup the good work. Well, I have tried to do that allthese

years. Alas, I must come into open confrontationwith the very man who told me to keep up the goodwork! I suppose if you were to ask Tom, he wouldsay I have changed. On the other hand, I feel that hehas changed. But I don't suppose it really matterswho has changed, the important thing is what doesthe Bible teach. This is what we will try to find outin this series. I say this to let you readers know thatI have no ill will toward brother Warren. I like to think that we are friends but on the day of judgmentwe both certainly cannot be right in the sight of God.

Tom recently completed his debate over at Dentonwith Mr. Flew, the famous or perhaps (infamous)atheist. I understand he did a fine job in this debatewhich was advertised as the "Debate of the Century", (whatever that is). Oh yes, a very closefriend of Tom is brother Roy Deaver. I have receivedsigned propositions from Roy and I have returnedsome of my own to him. If the debate materializes,it will be in Pensacola, Florida. We will discuss some of the very things contained in Tom's book. Churches in the Pensacola area are makingarrangements for the discussion. More on this later.If some of you "youngsters" are wondering how we could sell a book for a dollar in 1951, justremember if you place a 1951 dollar beside a 1976dollar the 51 dollar would look like a bed sheet!

On page three Tom says, "It is easy to make mereassertions, e.g. ("The moon is made out of green cheese," "The cow jumped over the moon," "Men are saved from sin the very moment they believe in JesusChrist as the Son of God) but often quite difficult topresent a sound argument." I am in full agreementwith brother Warren on assertions. I will go a stepfurther and say, I can prove "The moon is made ofgreen cheese if brother Warren can prove "One church sent MONEY to another church to preach the gospel." I will even go far enough to say, I can prove"The cow jumped over the moon," if he can provefrom the Bible that one church has the authority tosend MONEY to another church for the purpose ofbuying Bibles, tracts and paying preachers. Please refer back to the last article in which he tried this very thing based on Acts 15.

In the first part of his book he has some excellentmaterial on "Philosophical atheism" and "Dialetical materialism." Certainly there is no disagreementbetween brother Warren and me on such matters. For this reason, I will spend little time in discussingsuch. My objection, as I have shown and will show,is in his reasoning with reference to conclusions. I shall show gross inconsistencies in dealing with certain passages.

In the preface of the book, he chastized his ownbrethren by saying, "Even within the Lord's true church there are now voices crying that the Bible isnot truly inspired, not inerrant, not authoritative; not a 'blueprint' (pattern) for man's journey from earth toheaven and not a book which can be learned." In writing this book it is obvious that brother Warren was pressed from two sides. On one side he has those"Classical liberals" who would deny any example in the Bible is binding. Actually, some have gone farenough to deny the Bible itself! On the other hand,he has those of us who believe that Acts 20:7 (aloneand of itself) binds the first day of the week observance of the Lord's Supper on all Christians.Later, I plan to show that brother Warren and hiscolleagues do not believe Acts 20:7 (alone and ofitself) binds the first day of the week. Herein, lies oneof the problems. I will prove that brother Warren had to tread lightly when he came to Acts 20:7, lest heget into trouble on some other passages.

I sincerely believe that brother Warren, in his bookwas trying to "Have his cake and eat it to". He could not let the "Classical liberals" run him completely off Acts 20:7, and at the same time he couldn't come out too strong on the text lest 2 Cor. 11:8, Phil 4:15, 16 and other passages come backto haunt him.

Brethren through the years have used different terminology in dealing with the subject. Some call them "Apostolic examples" some "Approved examples," while others just call them "Examples." Tom prefers to call them "Account of action." I would have no serious objection to his terminology.In the first part of his book he refers to Ruby's bookon logic a number of times. He also discusses variousphilosophic errors, such as "Empirician philosophy,""Romanticism" and "Idealism." (We shall continue later)

A boaster is an individual who wants people tothink of him as a great doer of many things. He isthe type individual who likes to talk about himselfand his accomplishments. We live in a time when wehear boasting on every hand. It appears as if "bragging" has become the accepted thing in our society.

During the 1976 presidential campaign, there appeared an article in the editorial section of The Birmingham News concerning how different and unique Abraham Lincoln was, as opposed to presidents of recent years. Today, the president, or presidential candidates, think nothing of bragging about their "so-called" ability or great accomplishments. To the contrary, Lincoln was a president who had an humble opinion of himself, ofhis speeches (such as the Gettysburg Address), andof his ability. But isn't it ironic that the man who had such an humble view of himself went down in history as one of the greatest presidents this countryhas ever known!

In Romans 1, the apostle Paul describes the many evil characteristics of the Gentiles, one of whichconsisted of those who were "boasters" (Rom. 1:30).In his second epistle to Timothy, Paul predicted,"This know also, that in the last days perilous timesshall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, BOASTERS, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy" (2 Tim.3:1,2). In these passages the Spirit of truth enabledPaul to survey the future with realistic accuracy. Nodoubt, the sinful practices he predicted have experienced fulfillment in many generations that havelived in the "last days" or within the Christian dispensation. Certainly the evil of boasting is no exception, for it is running rampant in our land.

It would be safe to say that all of us, either directly or indirectly, are guilty of doing a little bragging or boasting occasionally. We have heard different ones speak of how common it is at socialgatherings of today to hear great boasting concerning position and status, education, possessions and ahost of other things. In so many instances, it appearsas if everyone is trying to out-do the other. The result is one big "brag" session! It is not unusual tohear even Christians boast about themselves, and if not about themselves directly, it may indirectlyconsist of bragging on self when they boast abouttheir mate or their children.

When we perform good deeds for others, we mustnot brag about it. But how tempting it is for us,after we have helped someone, to then go around "tooting our horn," boasting to others of what greatdeeds we have done. But please notice the words of Jesus: "Take heed that ye do not your alms beforemen, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no rewardof your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet beforethee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and inthe streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily Isay unto you, They have their reward. But when thoudoest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly" (Matt. 6:1-4).

Preachers sometimes succumb to the temptation ofboasting about self. (Especially if they allow the compliments they receive to go to their head.) If youdon't believe some preachers are great—just ask them—they will tell you! Some have been know toboast about the "big" churches for which they havepreached, the great number of meetings they haveheld, the debates in which they have participated, ofhow they are in great demand, the degrees they hold,etc. This all amounts to the practice of promotingself.

There are many admonitions throughout God'sWord against being proud or boastful. However, since bragging is so common by the world's standards, there are some potential dangers we must guard against. Just because an individual doesnot brag, that does not mean, nor are we to concludethat that individual is incompetent. For example, ifyou are not heard bragging about how "busy" you areall the time—"well, you are just lazy and bored." Or,if you are not always heard talking about how fantastic your children are—"then you must not beinterested in your children." If you are not heard bragging about all you have done for others—"thenyou are unconcerned for the needy." Or, maybe a preacher is

quiet and unassuming—not a "big preacher"—thensome will think of him as a mediocre preacher withlimited ability. Brethren, if we find ourselves withthese attitudes, then our concept and perception ofvalues and service has been warped.

May we at all times heed the words of Solomon:

"Let another man praise thee, and not thine own mouth; a stranger, and not thine own lips" (Prov. 27:2).3259 Greendale Road Birmingham, Al. 35243

HAVING THE MIND OF CHRIST #1

In Phil. 2:5 Paul says, "Let this mind be in youwhich was also in Christ Jesus." Upon issuing thisinstruction to the people at Philippi, Paul proceededby telling them the kind of "mind" Christ had. For,the next few months I will be discussing what itmeans to have "the mind of Christ."

Mind = Attitude

The word "mind" is translated from the Greek word phroneo and is used 29 times in the New Testament. It is translated "think," "regard,""mind," "savour," "be of the same mind," "be like minded" (Smith's Greek-English Concordance, Page368). W. E. Vine in his Expository Dictionary of NewTestament Words, Volume 3, Page 70 says it means,"to think, to be minded in a certain way." Some translations translate the word to mean "attitude;" while others translate it "disposition." The context shows the kind of attitude Christ had, and Paulwants us to follow Christ's example.

Christ's Incarnation

Before Christ's incarnation, Paul tells us in Phil.

2:6 that He was in the "form of God," but "counted not being on an equality with God a thing to be grasped." Seemingly, the meaning here is that even though Christ possessed equality with the Father (theright to be worshipped by men and angels; being Omniscient, Omnipotent, and Omnipresent), His attitude was one of being willing to lay aside all thisand take upon himself the form of a servant and bemade in the likeness of a man.

Everything that we do as Christians depends onour having the proper attitude; and having the properattitude depends on our imitating Christ. His attitude of humility and what it prompted Him to dois to be our theme in these articles.

(More To Follow)

"LOOKING DILIGENTLY"

The book of Hebrews is written to encourage believers who were discouraged and tempted to abandon their faith. A number of factors seem to have been responsible for this. Persecution by theRoman government had become a yoke that every Christian had to bear in some form. Then, on the part of the Jew, there was the attachment to the Lawof Moses which he found extremely difficult to sever.We seem justified in the conclusion that the basicappeal of this part of the New Testament is to theJewish mind as the title bears out.

Within this book there is a setting forth of a seriesof contrasts between the Old and New Covenants. Each of these contrasts stress the superiority of the New Covenant to the Old and the proof of thiscenters in the priesthood of Christ. Christ is heldforth as having purchased eternal salvation for us.That salvation is obtained by an obedient faith asexemplified and defined in chapter 11. The point is,this same quality of faith exemplified in this imposing catalog of Old Testament faithfuls, will bring victory to all. Temptation, persecution anddiscouragement will not overcome where there is alike faith. These notables are pictured as witnesses inchapter 12. The admonition is to run with patience,looking to Him who is the "author and finisher offaith."

The title of this article is in verse 15 of chapter 12,"Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace ofGod; lest any root of bitterness springing up troubleyou, and thereby many be defiled." This statement emphasizes the need for careful, personal scrutiny ofthe course of our life. We are given some reasons whywe should "look diligently." These reasons stress the gravity and solemnity of the task. We hope you willbe challenged by the following considerations.

The Christian should "look diligently" to his lifelest any man fail of the grace of God. This warning isobvious, lest one fall from God's grace. The danger offalling short of the grace of God was a threat of moment to the Jewish Christian of the daysimmediately before the fall of Jerusalem. It is no lessa threat today. Such being the case, the NewTestament is replete with warnings for every day andtime. "Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewithChrist hath made us free." "Whosoever of you arejustified by the law; ye are fallen from grace" (Gal.5:1-4). The possibility of receiving the grace of God in vain is to be noted from the warning of 2 Cor. 6:1,"We then as workers together with him, beseech youalso that ye receive not the grace of God in vain."How? The very idea of falling short is one consideration to be reckoned with. To receive God's grace yet not persist to its ultimate reward, eternal salvation, makes vain its purpose and empty its promise.

The prospect of faltering, falling short, is a threatto all of us. One of the most effective tools employedby the devil to this end is subtle encroachment. Circumstances, associations and the attitudes produced by the times and culture are all utilized bythe devil to the accomplishment of his purpose tocause the Christian to fall short. The desire to be like others about us is a problem as old as history. Itplagued Israel and prompted the request for a kingthat was granted in Saul. Whenever Christians wantto be like "other people," the world generally, theycease to want to be Christians. This is a great threatto our faith and constantly places it in jeopardy.

The impossibility of falling from grape is the mostinsidious doctrine ever perpetrated upon the human family. Most of us deny, vehemently, our belief in itand yet we very often act as if we accept it. An entireparagraph in 1st Corinthians 10 is devoted to warning against falling short with accompanyingillustrations drawn from the history of Israel. The conclusion is expressed, "Wherefore let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall" (1 Cor. 10:12).

Knowledge of the grace of God and the conditionsby which we appropriate the blessings of this unmerited favor is the revelation of the gospel. "Forthe grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denyingungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly,righteously and godly, in this present world" (Tit.2:11-12). Anything which falls short of the pattern ofteaching and conduct revealed in the gospel fails ofthe grace of God. Indeed, let us each "look diligently."

Lest there be any "root of bitterness" is the secondphase of the parallelism in the context introduced byverse 15. The metaphor goes a step further. The figure is that of allowing a root to grow till it produces a bitter heart endangering not only the individual but quite often a whole body of believers.The bitter vetch of rebellion and unbelief reflects in opposition to the truth and that which is right. If undisciplined, this attitude and disposition encourages the same in others. Anything antagonistic to the sweetness and purity of the gospelmust be immediately detected, rooted out, lest it destroy. Indeed, "look diligently."

"Lest there be any fornicator." Fornicator has both a literal and figurative connotation. Literally it expresses the idea of giving up to lusts of the flesh with specific application to unlawful sexual lusts.Figuratively, of spiritual fornication culminating inapostasy. The context, in my judgment, leans to theliteral due to connection with "profane." Both "fornicator" and "profane" describes the same person. One who is given to sensual lusts and pleasures is the object. "Profane" describes one who is regardless of God and His way; one who recognizesnothing higher than earth. Esau was such a man. Hewas not interested in the future, in the higher thingsof promise. He was interested in "now" and the base things of the flesh, the transitory things, mundane in nature.

"Profane" also denotes one outside the sphere of sanctity, debarred from sacred privilege. Esau epitomizes the idea. "For one morsel of meat sold his birthright" (cf. Gen. 25:27-34). What he abandoned is understood in comparison of the fortunes of Esau and Jacob. Among other things the birthright involved rights and privileges of the Abrahamic covenant rightfully his as the firstborn. But "now" to him was more important than these notable things. "Behold I am at the point to die: and what profit shall this birthright do to me?" Obviously, he cared for nothingbut his appetite and to satisfy it he gave up a futuresealed in covenant between God and Abraham.

One of the saddest aspects of this account is that

he later sought the inheritance but it was too late.

Whether the "repentance" (v.17) refers to Esau or

Isaac changes little. The point is repentance

sometimes comes too late. It is possible for one to

even reach a state of heart and life where he cannot

repent due to a hardened heart and seared conscience.

How sad! The application of this point is in realizing

that there is a continuing concern with "now" among

us and this breeds an impenitent heart. Remember

the treasure is where the heart is.

Indeed, "look diligently" to these things and all

others which threaten our faith. Have a keen eye and

a perceptive heart that we may guard against any

calloused attitude that discourages repentance. Keep

a tender heart toward God and His word and let none

be found falling short.

TV PROGRAM IN AKRON, OHIO

WELDON E. WARNOCK, 491 E. Woodsdale Ave., Akron, Ohio 44301 — The Brown Street church has begun a weekly, thirty-minute TV program called "Bible Answers," on WAKR-TV,Channel 23, Akron. We are on each Saturday night from 7:00

7:30. Our potential coverage is from three to four million people.If we get only a small percentage of that number to watch, we will still have a sizeable audience. The format is as follows: The program opens and closes with scenic film of the RockyMountains with a record of the song "Our God, He Is Alive." Oneis impressed with the fact that the heavens declare the glory ofGod and the firmament showeth his handiwork. Following this,I conduct a Bible quiz with a panel of three Christians. This continues for twelve minutes. After the quiz, a ninety-second breakis taken to offer a free Bible correspondence course. The remaining time, about fourteen minutes, is consumed in a Bible question-answer session. One of the local preachers works with me on thissegment of the telecast each week. Questions are solicited from the viewing audience. We trust that much good will be accomplished as a result of this effort.

Ward Hogland is to be with us the first week in April for a gospel meeting. When in this area, worship with us.

Page 15

Smyrna or LaVergne, Tennessee in Rutherford County. The nearest faithful churches are in Nashville or Murfreesboro. If youlive in this area, or know of some contacts there, please notify: Edgar Brown, 123 Elm St., LaVergne, Tenn. 37086 (Phone 615-7936149) or Sam Miller, 163 Greenfield Dr., LaVergne, Tenn. 37086(Phone 615-793-7079).

TO ENTER SPANISH FIELD

JAMES O. GABBARD, now of Fort Walton Beach, Florida,plans to enter the work in the Spanish speaking field sometimethis year. He is fluent in Spanish and has done some meetingwork along the border in Texas and in Mexico. Presently he lacksabout $250 per month having full support. He may be contactedat 671 Anderson Dr., Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548.

ALONG THE BORDER

A very fine paper, ALONG THE BORDER, is edited by GlennRogers of McAllen, Texas. It is published monthly and has 16pages. Part of it is printed in English and part in Spanish and itis sent free to all who are interested in that work. There are goodarticles and many news reports of the work in different places inMexico and along the border in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico.The November issue reported 28 baptisms and this is fairly typical of other issues. A number of good able men are working hard withinadequate support in many cases. While we should be concernedfor the work of the gospel in far away lands, we ought not toforget the opportunities in our neighbor country to the south of ourborder.

CHURCHES AT WORK MANSLICK ROAD, LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY — The Manslick Road church in Louisville has long been engaged in much good work. For the past few years they have carried on an extensiveteaching program both within and without. For instance specialwinter classes are offered in Prison Epistles of Paul, Genesis and the Law and Church History, part 2. The fall semester will offerGospel of John, Isaiah and Bible Geography and History. Muchemphasis has been given to the training of young men to preachthe gospel. In addition to local preacher support, they propose tosupport eleven men in seven states in the amount of $1750 permonth or $21,000 for the year. Julian R. Snell is the capablepreacher and the church is overseen by Raymond Byers, JamesWalker and David Key.HAZELWOOD, MISSOURI — This fine congregation in the St. Louis area always has an active program of work. In 1976 the members contributed $56,309.28 of which 80 1/2 was spent in the work of teaching and preaching the gospel. Work plans for 1977are increased. Ben Shropshire is the preacher and the elders areRay Findley, Ray Butler and Levy Maravilla.

PREACHERS NEEDED

TRENTON, MISSOURI — This congregation with 100 membersseeks a full-time gospel preacher. An experienced man is needed.Support includes a house for the preacher and utility expenses.Melvin Stanton, the preacher since 1971, is moving the last ofJuly to Macon, Missouri. If interested, contact the church at 17thand Hiway 65, Trenton, MO 64683.PLYMOUTH, NORTH CAROLINA — This small congregation ineastern North Carolina needs a full-time preacher. Attendance runs25-30. Some support is available though some will have to be raised elsewhere. Contact Ed Sulc, Rt. 4, Box 422-A,Washington, NC 27889 (phone 919-946-0343) or Frank Hollowell,Rt. 1 Box 458, Plymouth, NC (phone 919-927-3172).RICHMOND, VIRGINIA — The church at German School Road isseeking a full-time preacher. He. must be a devout man who will"preach the word, be urgent in season, out of season, reprove,rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and teaching" (2 Tim. 4:2).Interested individuals should contact: Delmar P. Coffield, 3200Southall Ave., Richmond, VA (phone 804-233-2661) or George W.Saylor, 509 N. Pinetta Dr., Richmond, VA 23235 (phone 804-2726988).