NO LOVE FOR THE TRUTH
The apostle John gives a good picture of the intense hate the Pharisees had for Christ and his word. In John 8 and 9 the Pharisees accused Christ of lying, having a devil, teaching evil, beinga sinner and even took up stones to throw at him.The boldness of their charges, without offering any proof, is almost incredible in the context. Some statements from John 8 are:
"The Pharisees therefore said unto him, Thou bearest record of thyself; thy record is not true" (vs13). "But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hathtold you the truth" (vs 40). "And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Which of you convinceth me of sin? And if I say the truth, who do yenot believe me?" (vs 45, 46). "This man is not ofGod, because he keepeth not the sabbath" (John9:16). The Pharisees said to the man who had beenblind: "Give God the praise: we know that this man is a sinner" (9:24).
"Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper, and doeth his will, him heheareth" (John 9:31). This statement was made tothe Pharisees by a man who had received his sight by a miracle of Christ. The man had been born blind and appears to have been known by all in the communityas a blind beggar. When the people first recognizedhim as the blind man, now walking around with goodsight, they did the very natural thing of inquiring ofhim how he had received his sight. He told them of aman "called Jesus" who had anointed his eyes withclay and then told him to wash in the pool of Siloam.He said, "I went and washed, and I received sight."Now the matter comes before the religious leaders
who must do something to discredit this powerful
miracle that confirmed the TRUTH that Jesus Christ
was the Son of God.
The procedure of the Pharisees in trying to destroy
the effect of the truth demonstrated by this miracle is
exactly what you will find in principle by the
religious leaders of this generation. Every conceivable
plan has been used by denominationalism to avoid
the truth of the gospel. False brethren are as ruthless
in trying to avoid truth as the Pharisees were. When
one does not love the truth he may take one or more
of the following positions to avoid truth:
- SHOW CONTRADICTION. The Pharisees ignored the fact of healing and its infallible proof,and tried to prove that Christ was a sinner becausehe healed on the sabbath day. It was their own ruleof the sabbath keeping that was being violated by themiracle of Christ, but this made no difference to them; their sabbath was more sacred than the truth demonstrated in this miracle. Those religious leaderstoday who do not want their laws (and believe methere are plenty of them) violated in their religiouspractices use the same method as the Pharisees inshowing contradiction, that is, the certain practice isin conflict with an important principle of their owncreation.
- REFUSE THE FACTS. It is incredible but these Pharisees refused to believe that this man had been born blind and was now seeing. They knew he was now seeing, but they refused to accept anyexplanation that would allow Christ to be the powerof healing. They called his parents to try to provetheir point. Today one can read a clear, complete andplain statement from the word of God, and it will berejected by the one who does not love the truth.
- INTIMIDATE AND THREATEN. The Pharisees had put fear in the hearts of the people bythreatening to cast out of the synagogue all who confessed Jesus. The Jews did not want to be cast out of their religious meeting place so they wouldyield to the demands of their religious meeting place so they would yield to the demands of their religiousleaders. This fear caused the parents of the man whohad been blind to refuse to answer the questions ofthe Pharisees about how their son had received his sight. There is no doubt but that multitudes of people close their eyes to the truth, when they know
it is the truth, because of intimidation from theirreligious leaders. This is significantly true today among many members of the church in some sections. I have very little respect for anyone who will sacrifice TRUTH because he fears any man or groupof men. I know people who will not look for the truthbecause of fear that when they find it they will haveto sacrifice more than they are willing to give. Wouldyou be denied a true search for the truth and accepting of the truth by the intimidation of preachers,elders or any group of people who do not love thetruth? You had better think about it.
4. "THE BIG LIE." From the beginning of thehuman race the Big Lie has been the means of Satanseparating man from his Creator. One of the methodsof promoting any false philosophy, theory or principle, whether it be religious, political, economical or social, is to continually repeat a Big Lie until thepeople begin to accept it as truth. The Pharisees simply said Jesus was a sinner. To shout this long enough and loud enough is to finally convince manypeople. The miracle was ignored. Jesus became a sinner to many people then just because the Pharisees said so.
I see this Big Lie approach so prevalent today thatwhen TRUTH, especially divinely revealed truth, isproclaimed I know that some promoter who has nolove for the truth, will begin his campaign of lies. Athing is not true or false just because some importantreligious leader or scholar said so. Lying is a tacticalmaneuver to avoid what God says, and to shift responsibility of sin to others. It is plainly an effortto avoid believing and obeying the truth.
This man in John 9 who was born blind and was healed by the Lord refused to accept the lies of the Pharisees and accepted only the truth as he knew it. No threats or charges of Christ being a sinner turnedhim from the truth. This should serve as an exampleto us today. Seek the truth of God and hold to it.Jesus said, "And ye shall know the truth, and thetruth shall make you free" (John 8:32).
FOLLOWING PRECEDENT
Attorneys spend much time reading volumes ofcourt cases in search for legal precedents to bolsterthe causes of their clients. The heroic deeds and admirable traits of the leaders of men whose names are enshrined in history books are handed down fromgeneration to generation as worthy of emulation. Many a parent has realized too late that his offspring has been watching and listening and has been moldedby evil precedent. Several years ago we come acrossthis poem by Samuel Walter Foss which expressesthe power of precedent.
Path of the Calf
One day through the primeval woodA calf walked home as good calves should;But made a trail all bent askew,A crooked trail as all calves do.Since then three hundred years have fled,And I infer the calf is dead.But still he left behind his trail,And thereby hangs my moral tale.The trail was taken up next dayBy a lone dog that passed that way:And then a wise bell weather sheepPursued the trail o'er vale and steep,And drew the flock behind him, too,As all good bell-weathers do.And from that day, o'er hill and glade,Thro' these old woods a path was made.
The years passed on in swiftness fleet,The road became a village street;And this, before men were aware,A city's crowded thoroughfare.And soon the central street was this Of a renowned metropolis;And men two centuries and a half Trod in the footsteps of that calf.Each day a hundred thousand routFollowed this calf about And o'er his crooked journey wentThe traffic of a continent;A hundred thousand men were led By one calf three centuries dead.They follow still his crooked way,And lose one hundred years a day;For thus such reverence is lent To well-established precedent.
Denominationalism holds to many practices for nohigher reason than the fact that they are time-honored. Many such practices are but the outgrowth of trends away from the truth of the gospel — trendswhich were difficult to discern in the beginning. Likewise, among those committed to undenomational Christianity, practices and movements have been defended on no higher groundthan the claim "We have always done it this way."
Traditions — Good and Bad
The word "tradition" is used in scripture in both agood and bad sense. Jesus charged the Phariseeswith "Making the word of God of none effect throughyour tradition, which ye have delivered: and manysuch like things do ye" (Mark 7:13). Yet Paul wrotethe Thessalonians that they should withdraw themselves "from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us" (2 Thes. 3:6). A practice is not wrongbecause it has been practiced by those before us.Neither is it right for that reason. When Jesus prayed for the oneness of believers, he said "Thyword is truth" (John 17:17). Truth is to be measuredby what the lord taught and by what the Holy Spiritinspired the apostles to teach.
Apostolic Precedent
We may also learn the mind of God by readingaccounts in the scriptures of what early Christiansdid as they were following the direction of inspiredteachers. Paul said "Brethren, be followers togetherof me, and mark them which walk so as ye have usfor an example. (For many walk, of whom I havetold you often, and tell you even weeping, that theyare the enemies of the cross of Christ)" (Phil. 3:1718). He also wrote "Those things, which ye have bothlearned, and received, and heard, and seen in me, do:and the God of peace shall be with you" (Phil. 4:9).Approved apostolic example was cited in Jerusalemto settle the question of whether Gentiles who becameChristians had to keep certain requirement of the lawof Moses. After Peter had drawn a necessaryconclusion from the fact that God put no differencebetween the Jew and Gentile in the initial offering ofthe gospel to each race, then Paul arose and relatedwhat things God had done in confirming the work heand Barnabas had accomplished among the Gentiles.God approved this apostolic work with miracles and wonders (Acts 15:12). If the apostles of our Lordcalled upon apostolic example to settle issues of theirday, then we would be well advised to do likewise. Itis on the strength of such an approved example thatwe observe the Lord's Supper on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7).
Yes, but how may we know when an apostolicexample is binding? One is always binding unlessthere is some passage which looses it! What exceptions to this can anyone find? We cannot bind the example of meeting in an upper room because John 4:21-24 looses the place where worship may beoffered. What passage looses the day when the Lord's Supper is to be eaten? In the matter of churches sending funds to other churches, every example wehave is of churches with ability sending to those inneed that there might be equality (2 Cor. 8:13-14). In evangelism, always a church sent to a preacher in thefield, or sent a preacher (2 Cor. 11:8, Phil. 4:15-16;Acts 11:22-23). Nowhere was there an exchange of
funds between churches in the work of evangelism.
What shall be done with these examples? Some say
they ought to be disregarded. Some say, "Well, how
can we know when one is binding?" Has a
congregation ever gone astray in its work by
following apostolic precedent? Is not history replete
with cases of men, churches and movements
departing far from the truth because they first
departed from apostolic teaching and practice?
Voices which warn against dangerous trends in
religious practices are not always appreciated. But
once a trend is established in the wrong direction it
soon widens into a vast chasm and a precedent is set
for coming generations. Most of the great apostacies
began in seemingly innocent "little things." While
attempting to promote truth and righteousness with
all our might, we would do well to seriously ponder
any action which would establish a trend in the
wrong direction and lead multitudes astray. This is
not to say that we should do nothing lest we do
something wrong. There is plenty to keep us all busy
for a lifetime operating completely within the realm of
that which is scripturally authorized.
Those brethren, who several years ago, made light
of following a Bible pattern in the work of the
church, like the calf of the poem, broke a crooked
trail which has established a veritable thoroughfare
through a metropolis of digressive practices. Some
are now trying to straighten out their crooked path.
It is like beating the wind. "For thus such reverence
is lent, to well established precedent."
Elsewhere is this issue you will find an item from the pen of James P. Miller telling of his plans tomove back to Tampa into the house where the Millerslived so long while he preached at Seminole. Our readers are aware of two serious illnesses which he has weathered in the last three years. We are thankful that he has been spared and yet has strength to preach, though on a more limited basis than before. He will be available for some meeting work and could be of great value to any congregation wanting to put a real spark into their men's trainingprogram. We hope brethren will use him to the limit ofwhat he will be able to do. He has worn himself out in the Master's service, but there is still some "wear" left. Scores of our readers throughout the nation have been led to the truth through his powerful preaching and hundreds more of our readers have been strengthened and "fired up" to domore for the Lord. Brethren, let's not let him "rust."
This gives occasion also to comment on the generous action of the Seminole congregation whichhe served so long and so well. It is no more than rightthat congregations which have reaped the benefits ofthe faithful labors of good men should make provision for them when they grow older and face declininghealth and reduced activity. We commend their example to brethren elsewhere. It is irresponsible toplace older men on the shelf when their health failsand not provide what they need. Through the graceof God, James P. Miller and his faithful Bobbie arestill with us for service in the kingdom. Let every heart rejoice.
HERE'S ANOTHER GOOD (?)EXAMPLE, FOLKS
Bobby Witherington recently related an incident in
the West Murray Appeal which he picked up from
the April 21, 1976 Paul Harvey News Report.
Mr. Harvey said a poll was recently taken of over
600 teachers to determine which publication, of those
listed, is most widely read by our nation's teachers.
One publication, Today's Teacher, led all the rest. It
was checked by over three-fourths of those polled.
Trouble is, there is no such publication!
Is it any wonder that West Point, and every other
school in the country is having problems with pupils
cheating on tests? As Bro. Witherington observed:
"Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Bible were the book
most frequently read by these teachers? If it were,
they would have known . . . that "all liars shall have
their part in the lake which burneth with fire and
brimstone . . ." (Rev. 21:8).
Can Divorce Save Marriage?
"Woe unto them that call evil good, and goodevil . . . " (Isa. 5:20). God's woe is surely upon ourland this bicentennial year. Adultery is called good.Fornication is called good. Perversion is called good.Pornography is called good. And divorce is calledgood.
In fact, according to an AP release from Boston,Dr. John Scanzoni, a divorce researcher and professorof sociology at Indiana University (an "expert") tolda conference of divorced or separated Catholics:"Divorce doesn't destroy marriage, it preserves it."
Scanzoni went on to explain: " ... divorce prevents explosions that might undermine the very foundations of marriage." I have problems makingout exactly what some of these experts are talkingabout. Do you have similar problems? In connectionwith marriage, what could represent "explosion" and "undermining the very foundations" more than divorce?
Such statements are tantamount to saying that infection promotes health or war preserves peace."For the Lord, the God of Israel, saith that he hatethputting away . . . " (Malachi 2:16). Easy divorce and the continued rising divorce rates are undermining "the very foundations of marriage." Whenever peoplego into marriage with the attitude that divorce is aviable alternative to making it work, it won't work! The foundations are already destroyed in every suchcircumstance.
It Made A Believer Out Of Him
"It wasn't an unlikely grouping," reported the Louisville Times, Sept. 16, 1976. "A defense lawyer and two young criminals"
"But the setting wasn't a courtroom. It was the lawyer's apartment, where he lay on the floor—naked, bound and gagged—while two youngmen armed with knives looted his apartment Sundaynight."
Stuart Lyon said he was happy to be alive after thetwo men poked him with knives, cut his telephonewire, and talked about whether they should kill him.
"For a defense lawyer like myself, who has represented endless armed robbery defendants, to suddenly be the victim of one was utterly ironic," hesaid.
The news article quoted Lyon as commenting thatthe ordeal would probably turn him into "an absolutelaw-and-order crank." If so, we could almost wish all defense lawyers the benefit of going through that ordeal. While realizing that our system happilyrecognizes the right to a fair trial and able defense foreveryone, too many attorneys in defense law are moreinterested in reputation and dollars than justice. For example, this lawyer said, "My feelings have alwaysbeen pro-prosecution, anyway. I'm only in defense law for the money."
One thing God has always demanded of a nationhas been justice. Israel was warned of impendingdoom because " ... they sold the righteous forsilver, and the poor for a pair of shoes" (Amos 2:6).
Among other things, the thieves took from the lawyer a small case containing his business cards. "Maybe, as a courtesy to me, they'll pass on some ofthe cards to their hoodlum friends," he said.
If that's supposed to be funny, how come I'm not laughing?
COGDELL'S "CAMPAIGN FOR CHRIST"REVIEWED — No. 4
In three previous articles, I have noticed some
things Brother Gaston D. Cogdell has said in his
"position paper" in which he seeks to justify the
"sponsoring church" concept of congregational
cooperation for the purpose of conducting a
"campaign for Christ". It has not been our desire to
"pick on" Brother Cogdell, but since what he says is
so typical of what liberal brethren have been saying,
Brother Connie W. Adams asked that I notice some
of the things said.
While Brother Cogdell thinks the basic question
involved in this matter "is that God has not specified
how congregations are to work together", I want to
suggest that the reason he thinks this is because of
his concept of the nature of the church universal. He
thinks the church universal is composed of churches
rather than Christians. To see his error, note the
following statements from his "position paper".
Brother Cogdell says, "The church of Christ shouldbe identifiable, above all things, by its love . . . i.e.,by its cohesion, so that it, and all the congregations comprising it, constitute one body — one spiritual organism . . . the church is comprised of many congregations . . . The body of Christ is ONE, and each member and congregation as a component partof that one body . . . There is only one true churchof Christ in the Cincinnati area. . . . Manycongregations, but only one church . . . the various congregations of the church comprise one greatcongregation, and are all under the one Federal Head,Jesus Christ . . . the Body of Christ, the Church ofChrist, is ONE, and every congregation is a subdivision of the totality . . . congregations as components of the one universal church ..." The above are all quotes from his "position paper" and all emphasis of the quotes are mine.
Observe Brother Cogdell thinks that "the church of Christ" is composed of congregations. This is a denominational, sectarian concept of the church. First, sectarians think that the church of Christ ismade up of denominational churches. They think thatit takes the Baptist, Methodist, Presbyterian, Lutheran Churches to make up the one universal church of Christ. Brother Cogdell makes a similar mistake. The Baptists do not believe they are thechurch of Christ; they think the Baptist church is a part of the church universal. Second, no denominational church would claim to be that denomination. The First Baptist Church of any citywould not claim to be the Baptist denomination. This is what Brother Cogdell thinks; the Clifton church ofChrist is not the church of Christ; it is a part of the church of Christ. This is his fundamental error and it is the error of all denominationalism and sectarianism.
(1) Paul told the elders at Ephesus that the Holy Spirit had made them overseers of the church of God (Acts 20:28). Were these elders over the church of God universally? Or were these men elders over thechurch of God in Ephesus? If they were elders of thechurch of God in Ephesus, then the church of Godexisted in Ephesus. There was not part of the churchof God in Ephesus and a part somewhere else. Ephesus being the "church of God" was not dependent upon the existence of other congregations. (2) Paul taught the brethren at Corinth that "yeare the body of Christ, and members in particular" (1Cor. 12:27). If Brother Cogdell is correct, Paul shouldhave told them that they were only a part of the body of Christ. Corinth being "the body of Christ" was not dependent upon any other church being apart of the body of Christ with it. (3) When the Ethiopian eunuch was obedient to thepreaching of Jesus in Acts 8, the record says he wasbaptized. He was saved and also a member of the church. Jesus said if one believed and was baptized(Mk. 16:16) he would be saved. When individuals didthis in New Testament times (Acts 2:38-47) the Lordadded them to the church. The eunuch was a member of the church, was saved from sin as a result ofgospel obedience. Question: What church was he a member of, the church universal or the church local?He was not back at home to identify with the localcongregation, if one existed there. He may have beenthe one to introduce the gospel to his local community when he arrived at home. This man was amember of the church universal just like any othersaved person. To be a member of the local church, hewould have to identify with it, for just gospelobedience did not make him a member of some local church. (4) In connection with the above point, considerSaul of Tarsus. He left Jerusalem persecutingChristians. He was converted, obeyed the gospel, wassaved and the Lord added him to the church while he was in Damascus (Acts 9). When later he returned toJerusalem and "assayed to join himself to the disciples" the record says "they were afraid of him,and believed not that he was a disciple" (Acts 9:26).Paul was a member of the church to be sure for the Lord had added him, but Paul was not a member ofthe church in Jerusalem. The record of Paul shows one can be converted, be saved, be added to thechurch by the Lord and yet not be a member of alocal congregation. If what Brother Cogdell teaches istrue Paul was not even a member of the church universal until he was identified with a local church,because according to him the church universal is made up of local congregations. (5) The church in Jerusalem existed for some timebefore there was another congregation. Brother Cogdell says "the church is comprised of many congregations". So according to Brother Cogdell there was no church universal in existence even though the local Jerusalem Church existed because hethinks it takes a plurality of congregations to makeup the one Church of Christ.
The truth is, there was a time when the church universal comprised every member of the church in Jerusalem for there were no saved people on earthexcept those in Jerusalem. Just exactly how long thislasted we do not know. However, when another congregation was established, there were saved people in it. But these were not members of the localchurch in Jerusalem. When this happened, there weresaved people who were not members of the local Jerusalem church yet they were members of the church universal.
(6) In Romans 12:8 after Paul has shown there is"one body" with "many members", he says that "hethat ruleth" was to do so "with diligence". Here were rulers in the body of Christ. Brother Cogdell says the"body of Christ" is made of or composed of a plurality of congregations. Paul says in the body of Christ "he that ruleth" is to do so "with diligence". Brother Cogdell, who is the "he" that ruleth in the body of Christ? The Catholics call their "he" that ruleth "the Pope". What do you call your "he" that ruleth in the body of Christ, Brother Cogdell?
Brother Cogdell's concept of the nature of the church universal is a denominational concept. He seesthe entire body of Christ functioning under somecentral direction. This was the problem some had inthe previous century and their concepts led them toaccept the central office of the missionary societythrough which churches functioned. Brother Cogdell's reasoning will cause him to accept the missionary society without its abuses. Remove the missionary society of its abuses and any argument Brother Cogdell makes for his "sponsoring church" concept ofcongregational cooperation can be made for the missionary society and with the same zeal.
The church universal is a spiritual relationship. Jesus Christ is head of his church (Eph. 1:22-23). Christians, "lively stones, are built up a spiritual house" (1 Pet 2:5). The church universal has no mission, earthly organization or head. It is when mentry to organize the church universal and give it awork that they run into trouble as Brother Cogdellhas.
THE HISTORICITY OF JESUS OF NAZARETH
"Historicity" According to Webster's New World Dictionary, the term "historicity" means "historical nature or authenticity." According to the same work, "authentic" means "genuine, authoritative, trustworthy, reliable; as, an authentic antique." Webster defines "historical" as follows: "established by history; not legendary or fictional;authentic; real; factual." To affirm the historicityof Jesus is, therefore, to affirm that Jesus' life onearth is established by history; it is not legendary orfictional; it is real; it is factual.
The Non-historical School
Few writers now deny the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth; however, many critics deny that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ of faith. The reality of thelatter person is totally rejected by many; even bymany professed believers. The following paragraph isfound on page 398 of Schweitzer's The Quest of the Historical Jesus:
The Jesus of Nazareth who came forward publicly as the Messiah, who preached theethic of the Kingdom of God, who foundedthe Kingdom of Heaven upon earth, and diedto give His work its final consecration, neverhad any existence. He is a figure designed byrationalism, endowed with life by liberalism,and clothed by modern theology in an historical garb.
Secular Evidence
As it has been noted, few writers now denythe historicity of Jesus of Nazareth; however, somewriters still assert that there is no compelling evidence outside the Bible in reference to Jesus' historicity. In addition to the celebrated but controverted passage from Josephus (Ant., Book 18,Ch. 3), there are statements from three notable Romanhistorians in reference to the existence of Jesus.
Pliny the Younger
Pliny the Younger is dated AD 62-113. In his epistle to Trajan, he writes that "Christ" was statedly worshipped by the "Christians" of Pontusand Bithynia as their God. The full name of this Roman is Gaius Plinius Caecilius Secundus. His Uncle, Pliny the Elder, lived AD 23-79. For further study see The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge, vol. 6, p. 150.
Tacitus
The Roman historian Tacitus, in a well-known passage relating to the persecution of Nero (Annals 15:44), tells how the Christians, already "a great multitude," derived their name "from one Christus, who was executed in the reign of Tiberius by theprocurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate." The full nameof Tacitus is Publius Cornelius Tacitus. He is dated AD 55-117. For further study see the work quoted inthe preceding paragraph, at the same location.
Suetonius
In the account of Claudius, in his Lives of the Twelve Caesars, the Roman writer Suetonius states that the Jews were expelled from Rome for the raising of tumults at the instigation of one "Chrestus," plainly a mistake for "Christus." The incident may De that referred to in Acts 18:2. Suetonius' evidence is also cited in the encyclopediareferred to previously.
Is it true that we have absolutely no faith at all?Some reason, "With the tiniest speck (as a mustardseed) we could move mountains as Jesus promised us."
Jesus never promised us any such thing. Nor did heuse mountains to represent obstacles of other kindswhich we can overcome. He was not talking to us.
Demon and Mountain
The gospel writers record that several times the Lordmentioned moving a mountain by using faith. Matthew17:14-18 tells that he cast out a demon which the apostles could not. Verses 19 and 20 state, "Then camethe disciples to Jesus apart, and said, Why could notwe cast it out? And he saith unto them, Because of yourlittle faith: for verily I say unto you, If ye have faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye shall say unto this mountain, Remove hence to yonder place; and it shallremove; and nothing shall be impossible to you."
Comes one to say, "We should claim this promise literally." If so we should go to that particular mountain. McGarvey and others state that it was Mount Hermon. Have you seen that mountain on TV?It is immense. But the statement was only about thatmountain and not about any other one anywhere.
Whether Jesus was speaking literally or figurativelyis beside the point. So is the consideration of hyperbole(over-emphasis). What we need to notice especially isthat this was spoken to the apostles privately. It wasconcerning their working miracles then. We should nottwist it to mean that we can work miracles now.
Fig Tree and Mountain
Another instance in which the Savior was talkingonly to the apostles is related in Matthew 21:19-22,"And seeing a fig tree by the way side, he came to it,and found nothing thereon, but leaves only; and hesaith unto it, Let there be no fruit from thee henceforward for ever. And immediately the fig tree withered away. And when the disciples saw it, theymarveled, saying, How did the fig tree immediatelywither away? And Jesus answered and said unto them,Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not,ye shall not only do what is done to the fig tree, buteven if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou taken up and cast into the sea, it shall be done. And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, yeshall receive."
Let us observe in passing that the mountain referredto in this case was the Mount of Olives. The nearest sea was the Dead Sea which was several miles away. Whatan enormous moving project; and what a change in thelandscape!
We have a friendly suggestion for those who wouldmove a mountain into the sea now. Start by withering afig tree; or use another kind of tree. By blasting a few ofthese work your way up to moving a mountain, a smallone at first, of course. Then you will be ready for the"all things" of Verse 22. In view of the "And" with which this verse begins can we separate "all things"here from withering a tree or moving a mountain? Please; read it again and note to whom he was speaking.
Whosoever
Perhaps there are some who would insist that thishas a universal application according to another account of the same event. Mark 11:23 quotes Jesusas saying, "Verily I say unto you, Whosoever shallsay unto this mountain, Be thou taken up and cast intothe sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that what he saith cometh to pass; he shallhave it."
Is someone about to claim that "whosoever" here means anyone at all for all time? If it does it means the disobedient, too. Shall we teach this as an exception toProverbs 28:9? Probably everyone will agree that itmust be understood to mean "whosoever" in a certain class. That class could not include more than the apostles and other possessors of miraculous gifts.Certainly not all men, not all Christians, and not us!
Transplanting
In addition to withering a tree, moving a mountainon earth, and moving a mountain into the sea, anotherinteresting physical accomplishment was promised.Luke 17:5-6 tells about it, "And the apostles said untothe Lord, Increase our faith. And the Lord said, If yehad faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye would say untothis sycamine tree, Be thou rooted up, and be thouplanted in the sea; and it would obey you." We have nodifficulty here in seeing that "ye" and "you" referdirectly and only to the apostles. They do in the otherpassages we have quoted, also.
Ultimate
In the time of miraculous gifts the inspired Paulplaced mountain-moving in the realm of the extreme.All references following are to First Corinthians. In Chapter 13 the first verse mentions the very greatestskill in languages, speaking in the tongues of angels.Verse 3 suggests the supreme gift, giving one's own body to be burned. In between these he tells the ultimate of miraculous faith, "If I have all faith so as toremove mountains". In A.D. 30 the apostles requiredonly faith the size of a mustard seed to move either one of two particular mountains. In A.D. 57 Paul would have needed "all faith so as" to do so.
Miracle-working faith was a gift of the Spirit. It is listed with others of those in Chapter 12, Verse 9. Toclaim that every Christian, even then, had or couldhave this one (or any other one of those special gifts)indicates the need for reading that chapter again.
From Chapter 13 we must conclude that no one nowhas any miraculous gift in the list of Verses 4 through11 of Chapter 12. This includes that measure of faith.And certainly no person in our time can rightly claimthe very highest degree of that "faith, which is presented in Verse 2 of Chapter 13. No one now canhave all faith so as to remove mountains.
For each promise made by the Son of God we shouldcarefully consider to whom he was talking. We must doso in order to handle the word of truth correctly.
—Box 895 Craig, Colorado 81625
BACK TO TAMPA
The elders of the Seminole congregation in Tampa,Florida, have offered the home they now own to mefor as long as we need it. This was made possiblewhen their present preacher, Arnold Schnabel, madeknown his plans to build his own home.
Needless to say, this stirred memories of yearsgone by to the time when the new building being erected exceeded the estimate several thousand dollars and creditors were becoming insistent upon payment. Each family was asked to sacrifice still further, so Bobbie and I decided we could combine some small assets and buy our own home, thus allowing the church to sell the house they hadprovided the preacher and ease their financial burden.When we moved to Kentucky, they bought our house, and it is this that they are now offering to usas HOME for as long as we need it. Sounds like a story book come alive, but upon serious reflection,more like bread cast upon the water returns after many days.
The entire church and brother Schnabel are to be commended for this work. Up to this time, the older preacher who lost his health, had little or no provision made for him. In the absence of any scriptural retirement plan, the larger congregationsshould feel a responsibility toward the preacher whohas given his life to the work of the Lord.
As most of you know, I have made a remarkablerecovery from complicated illnesses, but my conditionis such that an infection of any kind could be serious.I plan to stay active in the Lord's Kingdom and inmeetings as long as I stay well. On July 1, 1977, Iwill become 62 and plan to go under Social Securityat that time.
So sometime after the first of the year, Bobbie andI will be moving back to Tampa, and HOME, andmeanwhile you are asked to pray for my continued good health. As the time approaches, you will beadvised of the new address.
The celebration of the bicentennial year of the United States has brought to my mind many thoughts concerning the attitude that Christians in America should have toward their country. Should Ibe patriotic? Can I pledge allegiance to the flag?What do I owe if anything, to America? Does theBible answer such questions?
The relationship of a Christian and the civil government has long been an important, as well as sometimes controversial, subject. It's importance wasrealized by first century Christians since they werefaced with the question of allegiance to pagan lawsand pagan rulers or to the newly claimed "King ofkings and Lord of lords". Furthermore, there weretimes when it was right to disobey civil authority.When the Gospel first began to be proclaimed inJerusalem, we find, concerning the Apostles of ourLord, this account, "And when they had broughtthem, they set them before the council: and the highpriest asked them, saying, did not we straitlycommand you that ye should not teach in this name?and, behold ye have filled Jerusalem with your doctrine, and intend to bring this man's blood uponus. Then Peter and the other apostles answered andsaid, We ought to obey God rather than men" (Acts5:27-29). Here is open defiance of the law, approvedby God. May I refuse to obey civil law today?
The Bible does answer the questions we might raiseconcerning the Christian's relationship to civil authority. The inspired Apostle Paul, writing to theRomans in Romans 13 tells us: 1. the origin of civilauthority, 2. the purpose of civil authority, and
3. the Christian's relationship to this authority.
Origin of Civil Authority
"Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers.
For there is no power but of God: the powers that be
are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth
the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they
that resist shall receive to themselves damnation"
(Romans 13:1, 2).
The apostle tells us that God has ordained, that is,
placed in order or arranged civil authority. Since this
power is God ordained beware lest any that resist
this power find themselves condemned by the civil
authority and the Lord as well. In other words
when I disobey civil power, I bring upon myself the
wrath of that power, as well as of God who ordained
that power to be. This ought to be a sobering
thought to all who might disregard civil authority.
The seeds of rebellion have been sown throughoutmy lifetime. We have witnessed it in the cities and towns of our nations. Rebels and revolutionaries have defied any and all types of authority, from the home to the "pigs" or "tyrants" in Washington. This degenerate, self-destructive attitude has even creptinto the church, generating spite for all who wouldstand for Bible authority or expose false doctrine. Today, we even see the "C.B. Christian" pushing the"pedal to the metal" as long as the "smokie" is not "taking pictures". Jehovah decreed that the greatBabylonian King Nebuchadnezzar would wander withthe beasts of the field "till thou knowest that the most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and givethit to whomsoever he will" (Daniel 4:25). Let every soul comprehend the consequences of resisting thatwhich God has ordained and rules over.
Purpose of Civil Government
Not only has our Creator ordained civil authorityhe has also given it a purpose. Paul writes, "For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil.Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do thatwhich is good, and thou shalt have praise of thesame: For he is the minister of God to thee for good.But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid for hebeareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him thatdoeth evil." (Rom. 13:3, 4). Peter writing along thesame line says that "Governors are sent by him forthe punishment of evil doers, and for the praise ofthem that do well" (1 Pet. 2:14).
Combining these passages we see the generalpurpose of civil authority is to praise the good, be aterror to the evil, and to execute wrath on the evil.
Although at times we might be disgruntled becausecriminals can find some loophole in our laws, yet atthe same time, we need to thank God that our country still functions as God intended for it to function. For example, in the recent bizarre kidnapping of 26 California school children the busdriver who cared for the children and dug them out oftheir would-be grave was hailed as a hero, both bythe civil authority and citizens throughout the country. At the same time, the kidnappers were apprehended after a massive search to bring them totrial and to justice. Such is the function of any government, the praise of the good and the punishment of the evil.
Our Responsibility To Civil Power
Basically, our responsibility to civil power can be summed up by one word—subjection. When we yield to the authority of civil government (except when itcauses us to disobey God) we are doing what pleasesGod. Paul writes, "Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for consciencesake" (Rom. 13:5). When I submit to civil authority,I have no reason to be afraid of that authority. AlsoI can be at peace with myself because I know I amdoing what God demands of his people.
Going along with this subjection or obedience tocivil authority, I also have the responsibility to pay taxes. Notice Paul again, "For this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attendingcontinually upon this very thing" (Rom. 13:6). Jesussaid, "Render therefore unto Caesar the things thatare Caesars" (Mt. 22:21).
Honour is a responsibility I owe rulers. Peter writes, "Honour all men. Love the brotherhood. FearGod. Honour the King" (I Pet. 2:17). Remember brethren, this was written at a time when Christianswere persecuted, physically beaten and even executedfor their faith by evil rulers. Yet God commands honour for these rulers.
Finally, we see one other responsibility we havetoward our government, "I exhort therefore, thatfirst of all supplications, prayers, intercessions andgiving of thanks be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quietand peaceable life in all godliness and honesty. Forthis is good and acceptable in the sight of God ourSaviour" (1 Tim. 2:1-3).
In summary, God does not sanction any particulartype of government or ruler, but his people are tosubmit to, honour, obey, and pray for whatever typethey find themselves under as long as they are notcalled upon to violate God's law.
Should I be patriotic? If I obey God's law I can beconsidered nothing else because I will be what Godintended for me to be, a good citizen. My actions willbe such that I will honour my country and pledgeallegiance to uphold its laws.
Friend, let us. never be so foolish as to take for granted the privilege and blessing of living in thisland of milk and honey. No other people enjoy therichness that Americans enjoy. Did you know that apaper boy in our country makes more money annually than 50% of the people in the world? Also, think ofthe untold good done all over the world because Christians in this country were not only willing buteconomically fit as well to help support the preachingof the gospel abroad.
The United States was born with ideas of independence, peace, and freedom. May these nobleideas burn in the heart of every Christian throughoutthe land with a renewed zeal to release man from the clutches of darkness pointing him to the light ofsimple New Testament Christianity. I humbly praiseGod for the great land where I was born.
"SOMMER, YOU ARE RIGHT!"
Daniel Sommer was a student at Bethany College for three years, 1869-1872. During his last year there,James Beauchamp Clark of Kentucky was also enrolled in the school. Clark, better known as Champ,settled in Pike County, Missouri in 1876 and soonentered politics. He was elected to several local and state offices and then for about twenty-five yearsrepresented his district in Congress. From 1911 until1919 he served as Speaker of the House of Representatives. He sought the Democratic presidential nomination in 1912 and led all other candidates for twenty-nine ballots in the convention,but he eventually lost to Woodrow Wilson.
While Sommer and Clark were at Bethany, otherstudents arranged for them to debate "the Liquor Traffic." Clark took the side of strong drink and Sommer the side of prohibition. In his last speechClark clapped his hand to his chest exclaiming: "I am a man! I'm not afraid of strong drink!" When thedebaters met in private a day or two later, Sommersaid: "Clark, you said you were not afraid of strongdrink, because you are a man. But that's the veryreason I am afraid of it! If I were an angel with noflesh and blood to poison, I don't suppose I would beafraid of it. But, Clark, many men, by reason of notbeing afraid of strong drink, have tampered with itand gone into the ditch. And if we tamper with itwhat assurance have we that we will not go into theditch?"
Sommer, relating the event in his biography, recalled: "He put his hand on my shoulder and solemnly said, 'Sommer, you are right!' Then he told me his desire for strong drink was his 'besetting weakness,' and said the same was true of his father." This was apparently near the end of the school yearand probably their "last interview." But a few years before Clark's death in 1921, Sommer received aletter from him in which he said he still remembered their debate at Bethany College. (Quotations from Daniel Sommer, a Biography, compiled by William Wallace, pp. 101, 102.)
Strong drink is by no means a dead issue in the
church today. It has apologists in the pulpit and
consumers in the pew. A spirit of compromise on the
question is in the air and clamoring for recognition.
But surely all right-thinking people will have to agree
with Clark—when he said, "Sommer, you are right!"
A debate between brother Rick Duggin, preacherfor the Unity Church of Christ near Manchester, Tennessee and Mrs. Jaquiline Bowles, a representative of the Oneness Pentecostal position was to have gone for four nights the week of September 13th. However, it ended the second night rather abruptly with Mrs. Bowles walking out.The subject the first two nights was Holy Spirit Baptism today. Mrs. Bowles claimed that she had Holy Spirit baptism and could do what the apostlescould do. Duggin pressed her for a demonstration,showing that the apostles did not talk about their powers, but demonstrated them and let others do the talking about them.
In her speeches, which rarely came close to thesubject, she made a number of colossal blunders forone claiming that her words were the very words ofthe Holy Spirit. She had been unable to "recall the passage", addressed the audience "this morning" rather than "tonight", misquoted, misrepresented,and spiritualized terms in one breath and then madethem literal in the next. Brother Duggin chartedthese blunders and contrasted them with her claims that her very words were the words the Holy Spirit gave her. He showed that her claims were no different from those of the Mormons, Catholics andothers whom she said were counterfeits, and thatthey all could give the same "proof" she gave. At onepoint she admitted that she was not a Christian andsaid this was a man-made name. At another pointshe said, "my name is Jesus Christ". Brother Dugginkept the issue clearly defined and pressed it hard.
Finally, in her exasperation Mrs. Bowles interrupted Duggin's second speech on Tuesday night to give a "demonstration". She said she was sorry but this was the Holy Spirit. Her "demonstration" was to cite a part of Matthew 10,concerning shaking off the dust of your feet againstthose who did not receive the apostles. So, she gaveus the "heel dust" sign. She overlooked or ignored thefact that this was not the "signs" they were to give.The "signs" were to be done before this, (healing thesick, cleansing lepers, raising the dead, etc) and then if rejected shake off the dust of your feet. Sinceshe could do the latter, and could not do the first,this was the best she could offer. She made a fast exit without using her last 30 minutes of the evening. The last two nights of the debate brotherDuggin lectured on the Godhead which was to be the subject for those nights.
This was Rick Duggin's first debate but he handledhimself and the discussion like a veteran debater. He had prepared well. He knew exactly how to handle every situation. In spite of Mrs. Bowles pronouncement that brother Duggin would never amount to "nothing", I predict a great service to berendered by Rick in the area of public discussions. It was a genuine pleasure to be associated with him as moderator.
729 Westside Dr. Tullahoma, Tenn.
UNCONSCIOUS LOSS
Samson is one of the most singular and interestingmen in the Old Testament. He is recognized as one ofa line of judges used by God to deliver his peopleover a stormy and digressive period of 400 years.This man, remembered for his strength, served Israelintermittently for some 20 years. His service illustrates the power of God to deliver his people fromoppression without mighty armies. In Samson, asingle man of might, we see an oppression of 40 yearsduration from the Philistines interrupted and brought to a stand still. From Judges 16:20 a two point consideration is proposed. "And she said, The Philistines be upon thee, Samson. And he awoke outof his sleep, and said, I will go out as at other timesbefore, and shake myself. And he wist not that theLord was departed from him."
First, Samson's loss, expressed in "Jehovah was departed from him." The implication is, He was atone time with him, now He is gone. What differencedid this make to Samson? One must consider this man before the incident of the text to appreciate thedifference. From the standpoint of his consecration, Samson was peculiar. He is the only character in theOld Testament whose birth was foretold by angel,except Isaac. Born in the village of Zorah, of thetribe of Dan, to the family of Manoah, he was pledged to God by Nazarite vow. His was a definite, divinely appointed work and in his development intomanhood it is said, "the Lord blessed him. And the Spirit of the Lord began to move him at times" (Jud.
13: 24-25). We feel justified in the conclusion that hebelieved himself to be consecrated to God and that God would endow him in the accomplishment of histask.
In the maturing of Samson the heroism of the manbegins to shine through and as we recognize some ofhis admirable qualities we are drawn to him. What made him a hero? In part, his refusal to accept the degraded standard of his contemporaries. While in later years he lost sight of the lofty standard of hisyouth, he nevertheless presents the lofty ideal ofdedication. At the time he makes his advent upon history Israel was generally characterized by glaring inconsistency in what they believed and in what they were. Samson stands apart from other judges in that they were backed by the people. Generally, the movements they spearheaded began with them as individuals and the people rallied to the cause. Not sowith this man, he fought alone. Without the people's help, in fact, in spite of them, Samson delivered. At least on one occasion the men of Judah sought tobind him and deliver him into the hand of the veryoppressors from whom he sought to deliver (Jud. 15:9-16).
The very name of the man means "sunny" and certainly this is reflected in his disposition. His ingenuity is evident in the riddle of foxes episode.Following the first marriage to a woman of Timnath,a daughter of the Philistines, Samson posed a riddleto the young men in attendance at a seven day feast.The answer was pried from him by a designing anddeceitful wife and he lost the contest and paid the wager. His wife was subsequently given to anotherand Samson retaliated by catching three hundred foxes. Firebrands were tied in the midst of these as they were tied tail to tail and let go into the standingcorn of the Philistines. One can just imagine the whole countryside on fire.
His second noteworthy love is the woman, Delilah.She is the principal in the text for this study. It is she that said, "The Philistines be upon thee,Samson." When we analyze the causes of the Lord's departure from Samson, two are involved. One isinward and the other is outward and as is always the case the latter is subordinated to the former.
As explained to Delilah (Jud. 16:17), Samson hadtaken a vow to abstain from fleshly lusts. He had pledged himself to purity in heart and life as an instrument of God. Reviewing the life of the man itappears he never rose to the real spiritual significanceof that vow. Here is the factor which ultimately cropped out.
Outwardly, his life became the expression of a lackof dedication to the pledge of his heart. When one's inner life is weakened he becomes prey for his enemies. In revealing the source of his strength to Delilah, Samson betrayed himself. There was no intent of this as he confided in the love of his heart. While he slept upon her knees, his hair was shornand his strength and might with it. Until the strainof challenge came he did not know of his loss.
The constant message of the Old Testament is,only as God dwells within are men and nations great.This is evident from the illustrious history of Israeland in the leadership of many stalwarts. Somethingmade these notables great. What? The Lord was withthem, of their own consent, through their obedienceand consecration. Had men such as Moses, Joshua, Gideon and David, withdrawn from God to become like other men, they would have weakened as did Samson.
Secondly, the Christian's loss, comes as a result of the same thing in principle as seen in Samson, backsliding, falling from grace. The overcoming by old tendencies, by sin. It is not vacillation between strength and weakness sometimes evident in all of usthat I emphasize. As long as there is the dispositionand desire to rebound, snap back, one indeed will.But when the rebound ceases, when the life remainsin sin, indeed we lose. Betraying the pledge of heart,made when one becomes a Christian, results in loss ofstrength.
Often the loss of rebound quality, the desire tosnap back when we falter, is unconscious. Many seemto imagine, once saved, always saved. There is oftenno awareness of a conscious break with Christ and the church even though services are frequently missed and there is no active participation in thegood works of righteousness. Such take for granted they are still in favor with the Lord. The elder brother in the familiar parable of the "prodigal" (Lk.
15: 25-32), never left the father's house but he obviously was not in harmony with the father. Thefoolish virgins (Mt. 25: 1-13), were in company withthe wise till the coming of the bridegroom was announced, but they were still denied entrance.
In many instances change passes over the life ofthe Christian. He begins to admit associations and practices he once avoided. He prides himself in amore mature and tolerant view of sin, his norm has changed and he is unaware that he has lost thatwhich made him distinctively and peculiarly the Lord's. The weakness of such character becomes evident only in times of crisis, only then does such aone become aware that strength is gone.
Two things are essential to a clear estimate of self.First, what I want. That which is true of will, is true of the man. The direction of the current flow of desires will tell whether the life of a Christian is ebbing or rising. Secondly, what I do. The outward test of the heart is the doing. Conduct illuminates onescharacter, reveals what he is.
While there are many things in the life of Samsonadmirable in their nature, there are also manycharacteristics to be avoided. Although it closes on anote of general despair there is an overriding note ofhope. Namely, a mis-spent life can never be what itmight have been. Yet, if one will turn to God, he willhear our plea and bless abundantly. Samson betweenthe pillars of the temple of Dagon, god of the Philistines, blinded and ridiculed by his enemies, lifted his voice to God and God heard. The strength lost returned for the final feat and the record ends in victory for Samson. "So the dead which he slew athis death were more than they which he slew in hislife" (Jud. 16: 30).
Let each of us guard against any loss of spirituality, unconscious or conscious, realizing the greater danger lies in the former. Often we do not become aware of our loss until we need it most.
Without Divine Revelation, we would never know about God's Grace and salvation. Thus if one is to understand the grace of God, he must understand what the Bible says about it. One passage that sheds much light on the subject is Titus 2:11-14.
In this passage we learn that the grace of Godbrings salvation. Salvation is something man couldnot go out and get on his own. While they weregroping in darkness and sin, God in mercy and lovesaved the Ephesians by grace (Eph. 2:1-9). Titus
2:11 states that this is how all men are saved. Does this mean that every single person is going to besaved? How nice it would be, but many passagesteach that many will be lost (Mt. 7:13-14). What it means is that salvation is made available to all men, not just Jews or Americans, but all men. Everyperson that is saved is saved by the grace of God.Just how is salvation made available to all men?
First, by providing an adequate sacrifice for sins.Jesus Christ, by the grace of God, tasted death for every man (Heb. 2:9). We have "redemption through his blood, according to the riches of his grace" (Eph. 1:7).
Second, we are instructed concerning salvation(Titus 2:12). We are told about that great sacrifice inthe "word of his grace" (Acts 20:32). We're redeemed by the blood, but hear about it in "theword of truth, the gospel of your salvation" (Eph 1:13).
But are we saved merely by knowing that Christdied for all men? No, there are other instructions in the "word of his grace" and God demands a certainresponse to those instructions. In order to be savedfrom past sins, God instructs the undeserving sinner to:
- Believe the instructions about Jesus and from Jesus (Mk. 16:15-16; Mt.28:18-20). "By grace have ye been saved through faith" (Eph.2:8).
- Repent of sins (Rom. 2:4).
- Confess Christ (Rom. 10:9-10).
- Be baptized in water (Mk. 16:16). Someone argues, "That is salvation by works" and has baptism especially in mind. Is baptismsalvation by works or by grace? A comparison ofEph. 2:5-6 and Col. 2:12-13 will answer the question.(Eph. 2) Dead. . . Made Alive . . . Raised . . . by Grace (Col. 2) Dead . . . Made Alive . . . Raised ... by Baptism
Thus baptism makes us alive by the grace of God.Also, baptism, like the other conditions, is an instruction imparted by the grace of God; and if a manis to receive the grace of God, he must receive baptism.
When a sinner responds to these instructions he issaved from his past sins, by the grace of God.
But there are yet other instructions imparted byGod's grace. The saved man is instructed to denyungodliness and worldly lusts; live soberly,righteously, godly; be zealous of good works (Titus2:12-14).
What if a person doesn't live such a life? Then he "falleth short of the grace of God" (Heb 12:14-15).He has "received the grace of God in vain" (II Cor.6:1). If he lives by any law other than the gospel ofChrist, "he is severed from Christ, fallen from grace" (Gal. 5:4). Therefore, all Christians are urged"to continue in the grace of God" (Acts 13:43).
This all proves that God's grace is resistible andconditional. God does not and will not save the man who does not and will not abide by his instructions.
Does this mean that to be saved eternally, a Christian must live perfectly according to the instructions of the grace of God? No, in fact, weare also instructed that "if we say we have no sin, the truth is not in us" (I Jn. 1:8). But God, in his mercy, has provided forgiveness for the Christian who falls short of His grace. The blood of His Son continues to cleanse those who walk in the light,confess their sins, repent, and pray (I Jn. 1:7-9; Acts8:22). Thus, when a man enters heaven, it will not bebecause he was perfect, but because he did his best tolive up to the instructions provided by the" grace ofGod and "washed his robe" (Rev. 22:14) when hefailed.
To sum up:
No one ever deserved what God has done for us. We don't deserve the sacrifice, nor the gospel, northe hope of heaven; but God has given them to usanyway. That is grace.
If I reject the Sacrifice, spurn the instructions ofgrace, that is condemnation.
If I believe in Christ, obey the gospel, live godly,repent when I fail, that is salvation by the grace of God. Rt. 5, Box 403 — 0
Hwy. 25-A Sweeten Creek Rd.
Asheville, N.C. 28803
BOB NICHOLS BACK TO JAPAN
The Robert P. Nichols family has returned to the work in Japan where they spent 8 years and where some part of 15 of the past 25years have been spent. He preached his first sermon in Japanese19 years ago. We are sure that the congregations which he helpedto establish will be encouraged by his return. Sister Nichols andtheir three sons, who are Christians, will be great assets to the work. What an advantage it is to see a family acquainted with thelanguage, culture and needs of Japanese Christians going into thiswork again. At last report, there was yet some support needed.The cost of living in Japan is very high and it is absolutelynecessary that they have an adequate amount for living expenses and for their work. You may make contact with them by writing to P.O. Box 911, Chandler, Arizona 85224.
NEW WORK AT FORT CAMPBELL, KENTUCKY
JOE F. NELSON, 96 Airport Road, Clarksville, Tennessee 37040 We wish to inform brethren of the new work which has begun at the above address. We are located between gates 1 and2 on Highway 41-A at Fort Campbell. Please put us in touch with service personnel coming to this base. You may write or phone me at (615) 431-6376.AUDE McKEE, 8612 Lanier Lane, Knoxville, Tennessee 37919 — I moved here to work with the West Knoxville church the 1st of September. We have 26 members meeting in a converted dwelling at 9048 Middlebrook Pike. To reach the building, exit off
Page 15
1-40 at Cedar Bluff. Go north to Middlebrook Pike and then right(east) one mile. If you know of people in this area we might contact, or students enrolled at the University of Tennessee,please let me know. There are only two sound churches in all of Knox County.
NEW CONGREGATION IN RUSSELLVILLE, ARKANSAS A.
W. GOFF, 2509 W. 2nd Place, Russellville, Arkansas — We have begun a new work here and are meeting in the FriendshipSchool Building on East I Street, just east of Knoxville Avenue.We would like to hear from anyone who knows of people living in this area that might be interested in meeting with us. Our weeklyradio program may be heard over KARV, 1410 on the dial at 7:15AM each Sunday. My phone number is 968-7010.
TROY G. ADAMS, 6406A Birch, Ellsworth AFB, South Dakota 57706 — The day I have been looking forward to for a long time israpidly drawing near. On January 31, 1977 I will have completed20 years in the U.S. Air Force and will be retiring. It has beenmy desire for several years to work as a full-time preacher andprovide as much of my own support as possible. With my retirement pay and medical benefits for me and my family beingprovided, I will be able to labor full-time preaching, and be thatmuch less a financial burden on the church. We plan to move toBangor, Maine where I will work with Ralph Smart for awhile.My plan is to work with him in Bangor and do appointmentpreaching in the surrounding area. We will need some support aswe have four children. I will be 37 years old upon retirement.Those interested in helping in our work in Maine should contactme at the above address before retirement date.
(EDITOR'S NOTE — There are only a few (less than 10) faithful churches in the whole state of Maine. Recently a veryfine man and his family made plans to move to Milbridge, where apreacher is so badly needed. He sold his house, made plans toresign from his job, and was anxious to go. The brethren could hardly wait for his coming. But appeals for support fell on deafears, he is not now able to go, his family now lives in an apartment, their future is very uncertain and the cause in a needy place is yet without a preacher. What a shame this is. There arecongregations with large sums of money in the bank accomplishing nothing except the condemnation of the souls ofthose responsible for keeping it there while churches need help and faithful men and their families suffer. What about this brother who needs help to go preach in Maine? Come on, brethren, we can dobetter than this!)
GOSPEL TEACHER — NEW MAGAZINE FOR BIBLE TEACHERS
BOB WEST has announced that GOSPEL GRAPHICS, his publication which has been of great help to bulletin editors and many others, will give way to a new publication to be known asGOSPEL TEACHER. Bob West will still edit a Graphics Section in the new publication. Arnold Schnabel will edit the EducationSection. This section will feature articles on such subjects as:Radio and TV Teaching, Teaching in Print, Adult Education,Children Education, Curriculum, Class Preparation, Teacher Training, Techniques, Personal Development, Personal Evangelism, and Resource Center. The Graphics Section will include: Design Procedures, Typography, Audio-Visuals, and Reproduction. In addition there will be such features as Feedback,Reviews, News, Editorials and a Buyer's Guide. This paper willbe of great value to all Bible teachers, preachers, bulletin editorsand church leaders. No part of the work of a congregation is moreimportant than teaching, and yet, nothing is more shamefullyneglected than this. We hope Bible teachers everywhere will avail themselves of this paper. The first issue is slated for January,1977. All interested persons may receive the first copy free. Writeto GOSPEL TEACHER, 6121 Hudson St., Orlando, FL 32808. THOMAS HICKEY, Box 651, Central City, Kentucky 42330 — Ijust finished reading your editorial entitled "Investigate." I thought it was excellent, well-balanced in presentation and probably long overdue. I do want to disagree with you on onepoint however. A resume by definition is simply a summary of one's past job experience, educational background, etc. I reallyfeel that all churches should require them and that all preachersshould insist upon providing them.
While working with Nebraska Avenue in Tampa I took care ofthe correspondence between Nebraska Avenue and the men wehelped to support. Over a period of several months I came to feelvery strongly that not only a resume but also an employmentapplication would have been very helpful in avoiding some of thevery problems you lamented in your editorial. By being calledupon to supply such information to churches as might be requiredin an employment application form and a resume, brethren wouldhave a real opportunity to compare a man's claims against names,dates and places. . . . I am sensitive to your feelings about the"blowsheet" type of resume. In fact, I think we must know some ofthe same people ... I especially appreciated what you said aboutthe "missionaries." I certainly do not want to throw cold water ongood men who are courageous enough to do something I have never been motivated to do, but at the same time I have seen a number of men go abroad when I really felt that they would needa lot of close watching in the states!
DEBATE IN PINE BLUFF, ARKANSAS WALTON WEAVER, 4700 West 28th Avenue, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603 — I have signed propositions with Marvin A.Hicks from Corpus Christi, Texas for a debate on the Godheadand Holy Spirit baptism. The debate will be held in the auditorium of the new Convention Center here in Pine Bluff, Arkansas November 29. 30 and December 2, 3, 1976. The propositions to be discussed are as follows: Monday night: The Scriptures teach that there is only one personin the Godhead, and that person is Jesus. Affirms: Marvin
A. Hicks Denies: Walton Weaver Tuesday night: The Scriptures teach that there are three persons
in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
Affirms: Walton Weaver Denies: Marvin A. Hicks Thursday and Friday nights: The Scriptures teach that Holy
Spirit baptism with accompanying signs such as speaking
in tongues (as recorded in Acts 2:4) is fir the church
today.
Affirms: Marvin A. Hicks Denies: Walton Weaver