PRESUMPTION

"Keep back thy servant also from presumptuous sins; let them not have dominion over me" (Psal19:10).

Have you ever taken a hard, straight look at presumption? Chances are that you have met him anddid not enjoy it a bit. He is obnoxious, a uming liberties with a calm and confidence that stuns the average person. Is he for real ? Presumption is personified as the boy who goes around telling all his friends that a certain girl (whom he has never dated) is crazy abouthim, is going to break her engagement to her present fiance, and then they will marry at the first of thesummer. It never occurred to presumption that hshould ask first, or that she just might say no. Presumption is the fellow who takes his hospitalized neighbor's car on a thousand mile trip (without asking) , comes bouncing into the sickroom with reports of what a fine car it is and how great the trip was,and compliments the stunned owner with an "I knew you wouldn't mind since you were sick and couldn't use it yourself." Presumption is your house guest who opens your mail, calls you at work and reads the letter to you, and then takes it in hand to write an answer for you. Presumption makes plans for you, commits you to obligations, openly and freely asks personal questions, and acts as if your mind and your things are for his own personal inspection and entertainment. There is one good thing about presumption(this is what he likes about himself) — he is not a sneak. No sir. He is open. If only he weren't so ... so ... so presumptuous!

The presumptuous person obviously does not seehimself as he is, or as others see him. He certainlyneeds to be corrected, but this is most difficult. In the nature of the case presumption's blindness is exceeded only by its confidence. By definition it is "supposition of the truth ... without direct or positive proof of the fact;... something taken for granted orassumed to be true until proved otherwise" (Webster) .

Every illustration offered was one of a supposition without direct or positive proof of the will of the one imposed upon, a taking for granted what it wanted to take for granted and which is held with unquestioning confidence "until proved otherwise." That means presumption will be halted only by being challenged and having its hand called. It requires a confrontation of some kind, or else it continues on its merry way.

However distasteful and repelling presumption is in the social and business affairs of the common day,it is infinitely more so in religion. Social presumptionimposes on one's neighbor; religious presumption imposes on God. Many ugly and disruptive scenes have occurred in social and business circles when presumption was halted by a challenge, and it has been no less so in religious matters. But there is one significantdifference. The same presumption that is commonlydeplored in society is popularly practiced in religion.Many a man gives God a treatment in the name ofpiety that he would be embarrassed to give his next door neighbor in the name of courtesy.

The proof of the proposition is to be found simplyby reading the definition again, to wit: "supposition of the truth .. . without direct or positive proof ofthe fact." How much supposition have men done inreligion ? How many doctrines are preached and practiced because men think they are "good" though theyadmittedly have no direct or positive proof in Scripture ? Look again: "... something taken for granted or assumed to be true until proved otherwise." The time-worn argument, "the Bible doesn't say not to,"is nothing other than the voice of presumptionwhether it be spoken by the advocate of sprinklingfor immersion, instrumental music, church-sponsored recreation or societies to do the work of the church. But my interest just here is not in detailing any of the many practices i uing from sheer presumption;

it is rather to focus attention on the nature of pre

sumption.

Imagine again the man who took bold and unauthorized liberties with his hospitalized neighbor's car. And what of the guest who had the gargantuan gallto rip open the host's mail and to pen a reply based on his own reactions ? This is man in his dealings with God! He presumes to know what God likes and thinks in areas where God has said nothing. He presumes to speak in the name of Christ doctrines found nowhere in the word of Christ. He presumes to command and to approve practices utterly unknown to the NeTestament.

What an indictment for a man to resent and deplore presumption in his fellow man regarding trifling matters of the common day, and then turn around with calm assurance and smug piety and to speak in thname of God that which God has not spoken, and to practice as the will of God that which God has not authored. The Bible says, "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good" (I Thess. 5:21). "And whatsoever ye do in word or deed, do all in the name (by theauthority) of the Lord Jesus ..." (Col. 3:17). "Keepback thy servant also from presumptuous sins; lethem not have dominion over me" (Psalm 19:10).

_______________________________________________________________ Page 3

CORRECTION

In the January i ue of this paper, I made some statements about a Mormon temple which is beingerected near Washington, D. C. It has been called tomy attention that I implied that the Mormons sprinkle for baptism. I can see that I did, and I want to correct that. I knew better. They are guilty of enough error as it is without charging them with somethingof which they are not guilty.

THE VALUE OF TIME

In a current television commercial, the statement is made, "Today is the first day of the rest of your life." How true that is — with any day. Regardless of what we have or have not done, each day is a goodtime to begin again for a better life. The apostle Paul said, "See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil" (Eph. 5:15,16). To "redeem" time, asit is here used, means, "buying up the opportunityi.e., making the most of every opportunity, turnineach to the best advantage since none can be recalled if missed" (W. E. Vine)

Goethe said, "Time is infinitely long and each dayis a vessel into which a great deal may be poured, ifone will actually fill it up." Americans have more time-saving devices and less time than any other people in the world. Time gives us an opportunity todo something worthwhile for God, ourselves andothers. Remember, footprints in the sands of timewere not made sitting down.

OBSERVING DAYS

Do you remember when all gospel preachers used to quote Galatians 4:10,11 and condemn the sectarians for observing such days as Christmas, Easter and Halloween? Not any more. I can prove that some churches of Christ in this area have observed these and more. I have a brochure advertising an area wide Valentine youth banquet which was sponsored by the Northside Church of Christ in Benton, Arkansas. Where is the scriptural authority for the Lord's church supporting a Valentine banquet? Like themajority of other "holy" days, this one originated inCatholicism.

When Floyd A. Decker left the Christian Church,he wrote an article in 1944 giving thirteen reasons why he left. One of them was, "The Christian Church celebrates days of heathen worship, such as Easter, Mother's Day and Christmas; the church of Christ does not (Gal. 4:10)." They do now, all over the country. On this point, as well as many others which hementioned, many churches of Christ are as unscriptural as the Christian Church has ever been!

ABORTION AND CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

"In ruling on abortions, the Supreme Court traveled down a new path, exploring probably for the first time such questions as when does life begin and whether the unborn have any constitutional rights."

Thus reads the first paragraph in an A ociated Press article concerning the Supreme Court's recent ruling on abortion. Now that the Court has ruled on the right to take life at both ends — abortion and capital punishment — let us see where we stand.

The Court has ruled that the State may permit the killing of the unborn, but may not permit the killingof the adult criminal. The reasoning (if that's the right word) seems to be this: It is right to kill theinnocent, but if the innocent lives and then kills the innocent, it is wrong to kill the guilty. I don't get it!

I believe in the courts of our land. I am not tryingto discredit the Supreme Court, but I believe in the higher laws of God and that even the Court should consider His will. As I understand it, the Court's decisions on life and death are the exact reverse of the laws of God. Will He continue to bless a nation under such influence ?

NATION-WIDE

Many of us have predicted that the area-wide movements among some brethren would become nationwide. We were right. A "Nation-Wide Youth Campaign" is to be conducted in the Dallas-Ft. Worth area (Firm Foundation, Jan. 30, 1973). Thirty congregations have already promised to support it, and the elders of the Garland Road church "have assumed the oversight of this united effort." All there is left for them is to go world-wide, then eliminate all of theGarland Road elders except one, and they are rightback in Rome!

HOMOSEXUALITY

As ridiculous, repulsive and incredible as normal people may find it, we must agree that homosexualityis gaining in practice and respectability. In reply to a"broken hearted mother," DEAR ABBY gave the following quote from Freud:

"Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but itis nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation,it cannot be cla ified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of sexual functions produced by a certain arrest of sexual development."

Now, in case they are interested, let's see what God considers it to be: "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind; it is abomination." "If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman,both of them have committed an abomination: theyshall surely be put to death; their blood shall be uponthem" (Lev. 18:22; 20:13). See also Romans 1:27. This sounds like God considers it a shame and a vice.

ONLY "SING" IS TAUGHT

The worship of God is often perverted because men do not search the Scriptures in order to see what God has said. So often men act without ever thinking that just maybe God has said something on this subject. Men think that as long as they worship that God is pleased with what they offer. Jesus said that worship after the commandments of men was vain, therefore, it would not be received by God (Matt. 15:7-9).

Just what do the New T estament scr iptures on this subject of music have to say? There are not so many passages in the New T estament on this subject but what we can list all of them here. Look at these verses to know what the New Testament says.

"SING"

(1) "And when they had sung an hymn, theywent out into the mount of Olives" (Matt. 26:30). (2) "And when they had sung an hymn, theywent out into the mount of Olives" (Mark 14:26). (3) "And at midnight Paul and Silas prayed, and sang praises unto God: and the prisoners heard them" (Acts 16:25). (4) "What is it then? I will pray with the spir it, and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spir it, and I will sing with the understanding also" (I Cor. 14:15). (5) "Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymnsand spiritual songs, singing and making melody inyour heart to the Lord" (Eph. 5:19). (6) "Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom; teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord" (Col. 3:16). (7) "Saying, I will declar e thy name unto mybrethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee" (Heb. 2:12). (8) "And that the Gentiles might glorify God forhis mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thyname" (Rom. 15:9).

Unless I have overlooked some passage, the ninepassages above constitute the total of what the New Testament says on the subject of music in worship. It says singing. Therefore, I affirm and teach singing. No one will disagree that the New Testament teaches singing. Not even those who use instruments in their services will deny that the New Testament teaches singing. With this all are in agreement.

GOING BEYOND

Since the New Testament teaches singing and allagree to this, when one plays mechanical instruments he is doing that which the New Testament does not say. There are passages that say "sing" but these are no passages that say "play." If so, where?

To play is to go beyond what the Scriptures say. John said, "Whosoever transgresseth, and abidethnot in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both theFather and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds" (II John 9:11). One in such condition is not saved.

The devil uses expert methods, or "wiles" in aneffort to defeat all that is right and good (Eph. 6:1112). He is not only subtle, or crafty, in the application of his methods, but he uses also another ingredient of success— persistent determination, determined persistence. See how he constantly "prowls about like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour"

(I Pet. 5:8).He knows at just what points mankind is weak, by his long experience in trying millions of souls. And™

pray God's help!— he knows at just what points each

one of us is weakest. Witness how "Satan entered into

Judas," stirring and fanning the flames of covetous

ness to a white hot; "he went away and discussed

with the chief priests...and they...agreed to give him

money" (Lk. 22:3-6). Demas, who (like many today)

"loved this present world," fell victim to he who

probes every corner of the heart, mind, and soul with

evil intent (II Tim. 4:10).

A soul is lost from the bliss of heaven; the devilwalked in by "the lust of the flesh" and devoured. The flames of hell will receive many who were approached by the devil through the avenue of "the lust of the eyes." "The boastful pride of life" has been the downfall of millions— millions literally, notfiguratively (see I Jno. 2:15-17). Because the devilreads the hearts of men and moves accordingly, "many wise" "many mighty" and "many noble" are unconcerned, indifferent, even callous, to the call of the gospel (I Cor. 1:26). The devil manages to find all those who find "pleasure in unrighteousness;" he deludes them "that they should believe a lie;" and they "perish" are "damned" to the very last one "becausethey received not the love of the truth" (II Thess. 2: 9-12).

In Eve's moment of weakness, the devil drove the

iron wedges of rebellion into her heart with one solid

blow after another. With chilling confidence, as

though he saw the damning accuracy of his shot

beforehand, the devil boldly lied in the presence of

God and man, "You surely shall not die!" He who

was "more crafty" than all the creatures of life, so moved in cunning temptation that Eve saw sin, soul-cursing sin, as though it were truly "good," "a delight" and "desirable" (Gen. 3). And this is the same devil who sees each one of us in our most tryintimes, our most unguarded moments, and our extremitiesof life.

Though some men take "vacations" from God and heavenly duty, the devil is awake and active year round. While we work, he works; and, while we rest,he works still. We may occasionally be yielding, buhe is invariably relentless. We may tire, but the devilpushes on. Hugh Latimer, an English preacher of the Protestant Reformation, caught the spirit of Satan most vividly in the following words.

"Who is the most diligentest bishop and prelate in all England that passeth all the rest in doing his office? I can tell, for I know who it is; I know himwell. But now I think I see you listening and hearkening that I should name him...And will ye know who itis? I will tell you: it is the devil. He is the most diligent preacher of all other...never out his diocese... never unoccupied...ever in his parish...ever at his plough...ever applying his business, ye shall never find him idle" (The Reformation, Hans J. Hillerbrand,Harper & Row, 1964, pg. 335)

Brother Earl West bore testimony to the fact that

the devil rotates his crops in his tract on Congre

gational Cooperation. How did brethren get into

web of confusion and uncertainty on the subject?

"In the past forty years, brethren have faced many

other i ues-chief of which is premillennialism--and

consequently, we have neglected re-affirming these

old principles involved in the whole problem of

congregational cooperation" (pg. 27)

But, lest we forget this crop rotation, we might well ask ourselves: In the past fifteen years of "re-affirming these old principles involved in the problem ofcooperation," have we "neglected" some "other i ues" such as "premillennialsim" immodesty, gambling (You would be surprised at what many "Christian" young people think about this subject!), thework of the Spirit, dancing, formalism, sectarianisminstrumental music. How does the devil seem to get

the initiative in these matters? Too often, we give it

to him by our own neglect and complacency.

The devil is A master strategist, but not THE master

strategist. For God ALL-MIGHTY, "hath blessed u

with all spiritual ble ings in heavenly places in Christ,

according to the eternal purpose which he purposed

in Christ Jesus our Lord" (Eph. 1:3; 3:11). That

purpose cannot be broken, even by A master strate

gist.

"Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's

elect? It is God that justified" (Rom. 8:33). Remem

ber Satan, the Accuser, tried to heap condemnation

upon Job, "a perfect and an upright man, one tha

feareth God, and escheweth evil" (Job 1:8). He sneer

ed in the face of God and brought railing accusation

against Job. "Doth Job fear God for nought?" (1:9

10). Though Job could not find the reason behind his

terrible ordeal of suffering, he could still say in child

like faith, "Though he slay me, yet will I trust in

him" (13:15). In the end, "the Lord blessed Job"

greatly, and the perverse Accuser was so soundly de

feated as to be beneath mention in the closing chapter of the story

The devil's greatest strategy move of all ages did no more than to wound his enemy's heel, for his enemy was the Son of God. Satan used weak men, pressingfor every advantage in their weakest points, to "take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us." God laughed and overturned the satanic strategy and thundered from the eternal palaces of heaven, "Yet have I set my kingupon my holy hill of Zion" (Ps. 2). In taking thvictory, Christ fatally bruised the head of Satan, wr enched from him "the keys of hades and of death," and sat down in glor y at the r ight hand oGod (Gen. 3:15; Ps. 2 with Acts 13:33; Rom. 1: 4;

Rev. 1:18; Acts 2:33-36)

The Good News of the Great Physician is that we

need not be at the mercy of this fearful Adversary.

Though man sees his own filthy rags of sin and self

fishne , though he is bewildered by his own inability

to direct himself safely, God is merciful (Isa. 1:16-20;

Jer. 10:23). "Their sins and their iniquities will I

remember no more" (Heb. 8:12)

This mercy is in the New Covenant, the Covenant sanctified and made effectual by the blood of Christ,who became "the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him" (Heb. 8:13; 5:9; 10:1-12).Thus, by the merit of Christ and upon our obedient faith, God delivers us "from the power of darkness" and translates us "into the kingdom of his dear Son"

(Col. 1:13; 2:12)

Recognizing our need for continued strength, God

has prepared an entire suit of armor and weapons...

the only suit stamped made in heaven...the only suit

fortified in the power of God's might "against the

wiles of the devil" (Eph. 6). Recognizing our need

for continual forgiveness when we stumble for

continual forgiveness when we stumble and err, God

applies "the blood of Jesus Chr ist his Son" to our

needs (I Jno. 1)

For all his mastery of strategy and human weak

ness, the ultimate and eternal doom of "the devil and

his angels" is set. God has prepared "everlasting fire"

as the final abode of Satan...and all those who serve

him (Matt. 24:41).

Sinner friend, flee the wrath to come! "Submit yourselves therefore to God. Resist the devil, and hewill flee from you" (Ja. 4:7). Join in singing praises to Christ with all the hosts of God. "And they sang a new song, saying, 'Worthy art Thou...; for T hou wast slain, and didst purchase for God with Thyblood men from every tribe and tongue and peopland nation. And Thou hast made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God...Worthy is the Lamb

that was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom

and might and honor and glory and ble ing...Thanks

be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord

Jesus Christ" (Rev. 5; I Cor. 15:57).

"KEEPING IT IN CONTEXT" — NO. 3

In this series I have tried to emphasize "Keeping words in their context." Our study this month is on the word "Law." One of the reasons the book of Romans is difficult is because of this three lettered word. If you are in doubt just follow Paul as hethrows this word around in the book! Sometimes I become "dizzy" when I try to figure out what LAW Paul is talking about

The word "law" from the noun "Nomos" is used many times in the New Testament. Since it is used in so many different ways the context must come to our rescue. W. E. Vine says, "The word 'ethos' custom was retained for unwritten law while 'nomos' became the established name for law as decreed by a state and set up as the standard for the administration of justice" (Page 313).

Another noun, akin to "nomos" is "Anomia" sometimes translated iniquity or lawlessness. In I John 3:4, the R.V. says, "Everyone that doeth sin doethalso lawle ness and sin is lawlessness." T his text gives us the real definition of sin. However, it must be understood that a law must be binding on an individual before transgression could occur. For example, one could not transgress the "law" of animal sacrifice because that law is not binding today

In Rom. 2:12-15 Paul says, "For as many as have sinned without law shall also perish without lawand as many as have sinned in the law shall bejudged by the law; (For not the hearers of the law are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified. For when the Gentiles, which have not thelaw, do by nature the things contained in the lawthese having not the law, are a law unto themselves: which shew the work of the law wr itten in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witne , antheir thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another). If I have counted correctly theword "Law" is used eleven times in this brief text. The next question is, what does it mean? It is apparent in the context that Paul is talking about thelaw of Moses in the first part of the text. When hetalks about people sinning in the law, and beinjudged by the law it is obvious that the law of Moses is under consideration. When he talks about the Gentiles, not having the law and doing by nature the things contained in the law and thus becoming a lawunto themselves, we have another problem. Paul is evidently arguing that the Gentiles will be judged bythose things they knew to be r ight, but did notpractice.

For years denominational preachers have usedRom. 3:27-28 to deny the essentiality of baptism. It reads, "Where is boasting then? It is excluded. Bwhat law? Of works? Nay; but by the law of faithTherefore, we conclude that a man is justified bfaith without the deeds of the law." Baptist preachers will argue that the "deeds of the law" refer tobaptism, the Lord's supper, etc. Therefore they argue that baptism does not save. However, if onwill keep the verses in context he will find that Paul uses faith, not as the mental act of believing but inan objective sense. He contrasts the New Testament with the old Mosaic Law. He is teaching one is not justified by the law of Moses but by the New Testament law. In chapter five he shows that Abraham was not under the law of Moses, yet he was justified.Paul knew how stubborn the Jews were. He was trying to teach them they were not under the law of Moses. In doing this he used many illustrations.

Remember, friend, when you see the word "law" it could mean many different things. It could meanthe law God gave Noah; it could mean the law hebound on the Gentiles; it could mean the law oMoses; or it could mean the perfect law of libertyPlease, keep it in context.

In that excellent publication, "Plain Talk," editedby Brother Robert Turner, Brother Dan S. Shiplehad a br ief but splendid article under the abovetitle (Oct. 1971). I am indebted to Bro. Shipley fothe above title and for several quotations which I shall make from his article. I have long wondered if we were wisely and with the best of judgmentcarrying out the instructions of the Great Commission. In many instances I am convinced that the answer must be negative. This article is an effort toexamine some of "our" efforts along this line.

Brother Shipley said, "While the need for pulpiand cla room teaching cannot be discounted, it is simply not enough. We need to get out of our own 'front yard' with the incorruptible seed that cansave souls!" With this statement I wholeheartedly concur. I think the need is well expressed in the second paragraph of Bro. Shipley's article, which I givehere, "We must go because many will not come. Relatively few non-Christians are attending worship services and Bible classes. Those who do attend seldom do so with any regularity and even then are not likely to hear lessons that are most appropriate to their needs. Let's face it, most who need the gospel are not coming to our front yard to get it. If they areto be reached it will take more than the pulpit — and it will take more than the man who stands in the pulpit."

There can be no doubt that the Lord intended that

every qualified member of His church be about the

busine of teaching others the Gospel — II Tim.

2:2. While this is accepted as true, I would now like to deal briefly with what appears to me to be theattitude of some preachers. I have personally heard some preachers say that they would not or could not do what they seemed pleased to call "door-knocking."Most hastened to add that when called, they certainly would not decline. T his simply is not thepoint. The Lord said, "Go," and I can find no evidence that this meant to wait until the invitation was i ued. Some have more recently been quoted as saying the emphasis in the Gospel was on pulpitpreaching. I do not find this to be so. While there may be some disagreement on what Bible examples might be classed as pulpit preaching, I have tried counting them with the following results: In Matthew, there are 10 examples of what might be calledpulpit preaching, as compared to 49 examples of other arrangements — more closely resembling whatis called "personal work" or "cottage classes" today. In Mark the ratio is 8 pulpit and 54 other; and, iLuke it is 9 to 71 in that same order. John gives 5examples of public (pulpit) preaching to 47 that are less than public. Acts of Apostles presents the same sort of picture, giving a 29 to 60 ratio. Even allowing for a margin in judgment on this matter, itsimply is not true that emphasis is on pulpit preaching. Most of the teaching done by Jesus and Hisapostles was done under arrangements that permitted questions and answers to repeatedly pass back and forth; and, this does not resemble the pul

pit preaching of today

I am aware that the command to teach is generic and that many methods may be used, but it wouldbe my conclusion that apostolic example would furnish the most effective way or combination of ways for this being done. Such apostolic example is clearly set forth in Acts 20:20, "And how I kept back nothing that was profitable unto you, but have shewed you, and have taught you publickly, and from house to house." Both of these should be done by everyChristian, including the preacher. I know of notruth that would cause me to feel any other waythough I realize the limitations placed upon thwomen folk. I am not so naive as to think that I can spell out the abilities or limits of my preachingbrethren in the matter of "door-knocking." I am criticizing the attitude that prevails in some places.

I trust it is not widespread.

As to the preacher doing this type of work, there

are several passages worth some consideration. InII Tim. 4:1-5, we have recorded Paul's instructions to Timothy to "preach the word." Now, whose example do you think this close associate of Paul would follow in carrying out these instructions? If he should follow Paul's example, what would he havedone? (Acts 20:20). Who would Timothy "reprove, rebuke, and exhort?" Would it be only those attending the public services ? From the pulpits members of the church are urged to do this "door-knocking." T his is as it should be, but Paul told T imothy,"Let no man despise thy youth; but be thou an example of the believers, in word, in conversation, incharity, in spirit, in faith, in purity" (I Tim. 4:12). By what line of reasoning would this exclude him being an example in "door-knocking?" If any onemember of the church is to do such work, then everymember is to do it, limited only by ability and opportunity. And, with effort both opportunity andability can be enhanced. It appears to me that very poor judgment is being used many times in choosinga man to begin or build up a new work. To choose a man who admittedly is not very effective in any way except the pulpit, is normally to add to the length oftime necessary for "outside" support for such a work. I personally know of no such work that has been built upon pulpit preaching alone. Someonesimply had to do some "door-knocking" (as to newconverts). If one should say to me that he cannot do such work, I may raise an eyebrow, but will takehim at his word. However, I pose the question — ought not he, then, to work in some place where the need for such is not so great? Is it doing the Causeof Christ justice by choosing to labor in a place where strong talents are needed that one simply does notpossess ? It is not the lack of such abilities to which I call attention, but the judgment used under such circumstances. Now, I realize that a shortage of "sound" Gospel preachers may produce a problem here, but is it not a problem that needs to be facedrealistically? I have never been able to understand how some get "come" out of "go" in the Great Commi ion. Another quote from Bro. Shipley appears applicable here, "For these, and other reasons, iwould seem a wise redemption of time for us to become more involved in this house-to-house kind of teaching. We need more kitchen-table lecterns andsofa-pews!" And again, "Let's just get out of the

'front yard' to do the sowing."

What is the advantage (s) in house-to-house teaching? Bro. Shipley expresses this better than I could,"We need to take the gospel to the lost because in their homes is often afforded the most favorable of teaching situations. There, the student is not lost in the crowd; the le ons have a more personal flavor. Where else could a student feel more 'at home' and feel free to ask pertinent questions without fear ofembarrassment? There, he relates himself to thesubject more readily; he hears le ons most relevant to his needs. With home studies the prevalent problem of absenteeism is almost nil. Many will keep aappointment with a teacher at home who won't do so at a church building. What better arrangement for teaching Bible truth?"

Some will criticize the idea of "door-knocking"

while they reap the benefits of the "door-knocking"

of others; and this certainly comes with poor grace.

I am not urging indiscriminate, uninformed, and un

prepared house-to-house efforts; I do insist that we

need a great deal more of this type of teaching, in

cluding a dedicated effort on the part of preachers.

I have said before and here state again — a preacher

that will not do such work is not worthy of the sup

port that comes from the treasury of the church!

It has been my experience that where there is a program of house-to-house teaching, involvingpreachers, elders, and members; the most conversions, the greatest ratio of faithfulne , and less difficulties will normally be found. When people havetheir hands full working for the Lord, they simplydo not have time to introduce divisive situations into the church. There may be a problem with some in finding prospects who are interested. However,this problem will not disappear simply because wefail to do the work. There are still plenty of peoplewho "would give anything in this world" for what the Christian has — if he only understood it. No, wecannot make a horse drink by merely leading him to

water, but we can labor to make him as thirsty as

po ible! Of course, all will not accept whom we may

teach, but we will at least have given them a chance

of making an informed decision. It is God that gives

the increase (I Cor. 3:6,7). Let's, then, becom

"labourers together with God" (I Cor. 3:9). A mor

noble work cannot be found. Yes, it takes more than

the pulpit!

— 2685 20th

San Pablo, Calif. 94806

"Just accept Christ as your own personal Saviour." That is what the preachers tell the peopleProtestant preachers of almost every shade andstripe are united on one point — that folk must accept Christ as their "own personal Saviour."

The idea of accepting Christ is certainly scriptural: "But as many as received him, to them gavehe the right to become children of God. even to them that believe on his name" (John 1:12). Nor should one quarrel with the idea of accepting Christ as Saviour, either. He is that, indeed, and one cannotruly accept him at all without accepting him as Saviour. "Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners" (I Tim. 1:15), and is referred to in theBible as "our Saviour Christ Jesus" (II Tim. 1:10).So Christ Jesus is our Saviour, and any Jesus who is not the Saviour of man is not the Jesus of the gospel.

But some folk have other ideas. T hey believJesus was just a good man who lived a fine life and set a good example of self-denying service, but Saviour ? ... Bosh! How could one man die for another ? They cannot accept all that stuff.

Now these folk may claim that they accept Jesus as a good man. But every believer of the Bible knows the truth. These folk have not accepted Jesus at all. In fact, the Jesus they speak of does not exist —and has never existed. There is no Jesus Christ who was a good man, but not a Saviour. The only Jesus Christ who exists is the Jesus Christ who is the Saviour of man. And one has not accepted him atall unless he accepts him as Saviour. Most any preacher will tell you that

But let me state this truth in a more general manner so as to make it useful to a wider range of people. Tr ue, Jesus Chr ist is a good man. But he is much more than that. He is the Saviour. He is the Lord. He is the Head of the church. He is a Prophet. He is the Christian's High Priest. He is the Judge.

Some people, sometimes in doctrine but perhaps more often only in practice, try to separate one or more of these offices of Christ from the others. Theywant to accept Chr ist as this but not as that. But it cannot be done. Jesus Christ is one person, aunity; and must be accepted for all that he is. T hat person who has not accepted Jesus Christ for all that he is must seriously question whether he has accepted the real Jesus Christ at all.

Some further illustration will po ibly make this whole point clear. Jesus Christ is a good man and a perfect example. Correct. But he is more. He is the Saviour. And further, he is the Son of God. Paul's proclamation of Jesus included the proposition "that he is the Son of God" (Acts 9:20). And the Sonshipof Jesus is more than the sonship you and I mahave — it is unique; it involves deity. Jesus shares a common divine nature with his Father. He is even called "God" in John 1:1. The Jews understood that by calling God his own Father he was making himself equal with God (John 5:18). And their understanding was correct, for Jesus went on to explainthat all were to "honor the Son, even as they honorthe Father" (vs. 23). Thomas was not going too farwhen he referred to Jesus as "my Lord and my God"(John 20:28).

Jesus is also the Lord. "We preach not ourselves,but Christ Jesus as Lord" (II Cor. 4:5). The Lordship of Jesus implies his supr eme author ity andright to i ue commands and to expect and require obedience. Jesus claimed to possess all authority iheaven and on earth; and on the basis of this authority he ordered his apostles to make disciples othe nations, "teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I commanded you" (Matt. 28:18-20). Let it be noted that Jesus did not say, "T each them all things whatsoever I commanded you." He did say."Teach them to observe all things whatsoever Icommanded you." It is wholly inconsistent and even hypocritical to confess Jesus as Lord and then refuse to do what he says, "And why call ye meLord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?"(Luke 6:46). Jesus' question will perhaps remind one of another statement: "Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdomof heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father who is in heaven" (Matt. 7:21)

Following his resurrection, Jesus was installed asHead of the church, which is his body (Eph. 1:2223). It is his province, as Head of the church, to givedirection to the church, his body. The church, as his body, "is subject to Christ," according to Paul's statement in Eph. 5:24. That means the church is not free to go ahead and act on its own; it is to submit to the direction of its Head, to observe his instruction, to yield to his authority

Perhaps you know of folk in certain religious sects who claim to accept Christ but do not believe in his deity. One would just have to say that these folk have not accepted Jesus at all. The Jesus Christ ofthe gospel is both Saviour and God. Any other Jesus is not the Jesus Christ of the gospel, but a counterfeit Jesus, a fraud.

But is it po ible that some people have tried toaccept Jesus as the Son of God and as their Saviour without accepting him as Lord? I believe it is. Perhaps such folk do not realize what they have doneBut what other explanation can be given for themany acts of worship and ser vice in which theshow no regard for the authority of the Lord?

Examples of such disregard for the Lordship oJesus could be multiplied. Jesus teaches that baptism is a condition of salvation (Mark 16:16; compare Acts 2:38; 22:16; I Pet. 3:21). But manydeny it and offer salvation to men on the basis of a faith in the heart which has yet to find expression in this act of faith appointed by the Lord. Jesus teaches that folk are to be baptized, immersed, buried in baptism (Rom. 6:4; Col. 2:12). But manysubstitute a few drops of water sprinkled on thehead. Jesus teaches that the per son to be baptized is that one who has received the word (Acts 2:41), the one who has believed (Acts 8:12). But many,acting on their own and without direction fromChrist, baptize infants who can neither receive theword nor believe. Jesus teaches his people to singpraises (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16). Many take it uponthemselves to worship with mechanical, instrumental music in addition — something Jesus never sanctioned. Speaking for Jesus, Paul wrote that womenwere to "keep silence in the churches" (I Cor. 14:34); but some churches have women preachers. Many churches substitute complex organizations for the simple local organization Jesus ordained for his church (Acts 14:23; Phil. 1:1).

It would seem that such folk must seriously consider the question whether they have really ever accepted the real Jesus Christ at all. The Jesus Christ of the gospel is the Lord and the Head of the church. If the Jesus you have received is not theLord and the Head of the church, then what Jesus have you received ?

It is not too surprising that such unauthorized practices are found in the churches. Most of thepreachers have given the impression that accepting Jesus involves merely some kind of mystical or emotional or mental reliance upon him for salvation. They have not taught the people that any true acceptance of .Jesus involves accepting him for all that he is. And that means accepting him as Lord as well as Saviour.

Paul spoke of "another Jesus" (II Cor. 11:4) — an impostor, a counterfeit, a fraud. This Jesus who can be accepted as Saviour without being accepted as Lord is such a Jesus. T he only Jesus who is theSaviour and the Son of God is the Jesus who is also the Lord and the Head of the church. There is no Saviour Jesus who is not also the Lord Jesus — no more than there is a Saviour Jesus who is not divine. And that person who does not acknowledge the Lordship of Jesus in his life and service to God has notreally accepted the Saviour Jesus, but only a counterfeit Jesus who is neither Saviour, Lord, nor Son of God, and in fact is only a fictional Jesus, a fair y tale character, who only exists in the imaginationof men.

Peter stood before the highest court of the Jewish nation to proclaim, "And in none other is there salvation: for neither is there any other name under heaven, that is given among men, wherein we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). Peter was speaking of thereal Jesus — who is Saviour, Son of God, and Lord! He is the one you must accept or face an everlasting doom.

Box 155 Romulus, Michigan 48174

HELIKIA. "STATURE"

In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus says, by implication, that a man cannot add even one cubit to his "stature," Matt. 6:27. The term "stature" is translated from the Greek word helikia, which occurs in eight passages in the Greek Testament.

Some versions do not use the word "stature" in Matt. 6:27, choosing rather "span of life," etc.

IN NON-BIBLICAL LITERATURE

In non-Biblical literature the term helikia is used to denote "age," particular ly, the idea of "coming to legal age, etc." There are many papyri that contain this use of the word.

Hellenistic scholars would probably deny that the word helikia is used at all in the papyri in the sense of "stature," or "physical size."

WHAT DOES JESUS MEAN?

Is Jesus saying that anxiety cannot increase one's height? Of course, it is obvious that this is true; but is that what Jesus means in Matt. 6:27?

According to Luke 2:52 the young man Jesus in

creased in helikia. Did Jesus increase in height? Or,

is the writer saying the Jesus increased in age?

It is obvious that Jesus increased in both senses;

but what is meant in Luke 2:52?

ANXIETY AND LIFE

In my judgment, Jesus is referring to one's "age" in Matt. 6:27. T he irony of His teaching is seen in the fact that anxiety actually diminishes one's span of life.

WHAT ABOUT "CUBIT"?

Someone might suggest that if Jesus is speaking of "age" He would not say that we cannot add a"cubit" to our "age." Actually, there is evidencethat the term "cubit" is sometimes used in the sense of a "cubit" of time; that is, a small amount of time.

WHAT ABOUT ZACCHAEUS?

According to Luke 19:3 Zacchaeus was small of

helikia. It is evident from the context of this pas

sage that helikia means "stature," or "height."

"E lijah came unto all the people, and said, holong halt ye between two opinions? If the Lord beGod, follow him: but if Baal, then follow him"(I Kings 18:21). On this occasion the great prophet was trying to turn the people from idolatry to faithful service to God. God will not accept worship frompeople who also serve their idols. Only those who served the Lord with their whole heart were acceptable to Him. Sympathy toward Baal worship woulmake their worship to God vain

Christians are taught to be patient and reasonable people and to realize that the progress of truth depends upon teaching. We are to exhort one another lest any be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. We are to endeavor to keep the unity ofthe spirit in the bond of peace. "Brethren, if a manbe overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such a one in the spirit of meekness considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted" (Gal. 6:1).It is certainly true that any man may, at one time or another, be overtaken in a fault, therefore, the one to correct him should do so in meekness and should be very careful as to his own behavior. The time may soon come when he, too, will be overtaken in a fault.

Colo ians 4:6 states: "Let your speech be alwayswith grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may knohow ye ought to answer every man." This verse does not oppose the boldness of speech for which Paulprayed (Eph. 6:19,20). The motive is to be in harmony with a heart filled with favor or grace. T he right words are to be used in the right way to indicate wisdom that is from above. James said, "The wisdom that is from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, and easy to be entreated, full of mercyand good fruits, without partiality, and withouhypocrisy" (James 3:17)

We have the question of Elijah very much in mindin our study at this time, but we also seek to avoid any idea of impulsivene , unreasonablene , or impatience. Let all things be done in love for God, forthe truth, and for man. E lijah asked, "How lonhalt ye between two opinions?" We should never hesitate in our choice of right over wrong, or truthin preference to error.

There is a correct answer in the complete word of God for each good question on doctrine. Gospel preachers of the past have taught the truth and were not afraid of questioning. If a man speaks as the oracles of God he has a solid rock foundation. A person who does not know the right answer to a good question should hesitate until he has searched the scripture. It is surely unwise to jump to a conclusion by impulse, or to follow blindly the suggestion of some

man.

It is necessary to take a certain bit of time to studyan issue that arises in order to be certain of the safety of one's position. The profitable word is very suitable for correction and instruction, so one cantake the safe position on each i ue. Time is not the only thing needed. A man needs an open mind, love for the truth, and courage enough to stand firmly with the truth at any cost.

It does not take long on a given i ue to learn the truth. Beyond that time, there is no excuse for hesitancy or halting. To wait to see how the crowd will go, to be quiet rather than face opposition, to shun to teach the truth to avoid sacrifice or other such occasions of silence on vital i ues are unworthy othe true Christian soldier.

Two people may be thought of together. One, inhis weakness, does not yet know the truth, so he does not stand on the Lord's side. Another knows but hesitates for one reason or another. The latter is worthy of many stripes. May there be more andmore men of grace and patience who study to learn,and boldly proclaim the whole truth on any false doctrine that arises to threaten the unity of God's people.

From time to time doctrines have been introduced and stressed that have the power to separate the chaff from the wheat. Those who use "great wisdom" in the "nations about them" follow the winds of doctrines the heretics make popular. Those who lovethe truth are steadfast and immovable at such times. II Thess. 2:10-12 speaks of him "whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signsand lying wonders, and with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they mightbe saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusions, that they should believe a lie: that they all might be damned who believe not the truth,but had pleasure in unrighteousness."

It seems evident that there is a great difference between a strong delusion, intended for those who love not the truth, and the truth itself. Halting between the delusion and truth is not characteristic of a good soldier of the truth. Vigilant overseers and teachers will warn their brethren day and night othe danger of deception so the false doctrines will be only for those who love not the truth but have pleasure in unrighteousness. To neglect teaching on such strong delusions may mean the loss of many weasheep from the flock. To fail to warn is criminal. To fail to study and know is inexcusable.

"There must be also heresies among you, thathey which are approved may be made manifest among you." This is the reading of I Cor. 11:19.Each generation is to be tested. Each congregation is to be sifted. Who can stand? Those who study tshow themselves approved unto God may be workmen who need not be ashamed. The Lord knows and loves His own, but He does not accept the service of those who love not the truth but have pleasure in unrighteousness. For such reasons strong delusions or heresies are sent to make manifest those who are approved. Only those who give earnest heed to thethings written in the word avoid drifting toward the day when they will not endure sound doctrine.

Our generation sees its false doctrines and testingheresies just as other generations have seen theirs. When it is time for the Lord to prune His vine, there are heartaches. The man with the pruning knife cuts many limbs from his peach tree or grape vine, butit is that there might be more and better fruit. It is also in order to save the tree or vine from total lo . Chr ist said, "He that is not with me is against me;and he that gathereth not with me scattereth abroad" (Matt. 12:30). Where is the middle ground?Those who gather with Him are His faithful servants. All others scatter. When the instrument of music was being introduced into churches of Christ in the last century to the division of the body oChrist, there were three groups. Some favored theinstrument, some opposed it, and others tried towork with both groups. The groups were different. It was either right to make the addition or it was wrong. It was introduced where men favored it and where men did not oppose it. It was kept out onlwhere it was actively and effectively opposed. There is a message of warning in this experience for our day and any day.

To have recommended a man in the last centurywho favored the instrument to preach for an untaught congregation would likely have meant thloss of the congregation to digression. Thus biddinghim godspeed would be a way of partaking of his evil deeds. To mark one who thus carries a divisive doctrine is more the spirit of Christ and His apostles (See Rom. 16:17.) If a fine conservative and faithful Christian labors to see a congregation begin,he may succeed in his worthy work. If he then encourages it to get a preacher who will work toward getting the church into recreational work, which is not its mission, or toward Institutionalism, or anyother error, he may in a short time see that which he espoused to Christ as a chaste virgin defiled before Him. It would be a sin to open a great door ofopportunity for a teacher who subverts whole houses. His mouth should be stopped with plaiteaching of sound doctrine.Perfection is not found in any man, so if one whowas not perfect could not be recommended there would be none to recommend. Some people love thtruth and are constantly learning. Some errors areprivate in nature and are not great threats to thechurch. For one to get deliberately into the trencwith heretics in a destructive battle that is ragingagainst truth is to mark himself unworthy of place of responsibility in the Lord's army. For one to wander aimle ly in "no man's land" between the opposing armies is to identify himself as one who is not awake to the danger. He is in great danger himself, and he is in no position to gain respect from the right hand or the left. There is no middle ground between right and wrong, between truth and error. A man is a useful soldier in the army of the Lord only as he contends earnestly for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints (Jude 3). He ispure from the blood of his fellow man only if he shuns not to declare the whole counsel. See Acts

20:26.27. The days of the American Revolution were not the only days that tried men's souls. Every soulis tested as by fire. Look at I Cor. 3:10-13. "According to the grace of God which is given unto me as a wise master-builder, I have laid the foundation andanother buildeth thereon. But let every man takheed how he buildeth thereupon. For other foundation can no man lay than is laid, which is Jesus Christ. Now if any man build upon this foundationgold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble; every man's work shall be made manifest; for thday shall declare it, because it shall be revealed byfire; and the fire shall try every man's work of what sort it is."

Preaching that is directed toward seeing peoplbecome rooted and grounded in the truth and able to discern between good and evil is directed in theright way. That which apologizes for error or fights the truth and faithful proclaimer s of truth is notsound preaching. Let us all pray that the Lord will send more laborers into His vineyard who can stand the noon day sun, and who will not fall away in timeof temptation. We should also work to this end aswell as pray. Stand on the house top, as it were, and proclaim the truth far and wide. Send out a call for men who are unafraid, unashamed, and well informed.

In the 25th Psalm, verses 1-5, we read the words

of David: "Unto thee, O Lord, do I lift up my soul.

O my God, I trust in thee: Let me not be ashamed,

let not mine enemies triumph over me. Yea, let none

that wait on thee be ashamed: let them be ashamed

which transgress without cause. Shew me thy ways,

O Lord; teach me thy paths. Lead me in thy truth,

and teach me: for thou art the God of my salvation;

on thee do I wait all the day." These verses state that

one should not be ashamed of doing the work of the

Lord. No one should be ashamed of being a Chris

tian, a servant of God. The life of a Christian can be

the most rewarding on earth, and it will be the most

rewarding after death. It has been said, "Life is

what you make it." This is especially true when we

consider the life of a child of God, a Christian.

The apostle Paul understood fully the life of Christian. In Rom. 1:16 he states: "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of GOD unto salvation to ever y one that believeth;to the Jew first, and also to the Greek." At the time of Paul's preaching, many thought the message heproclaimed was foolishness (I Cor. 1:21-24). Even though those around Paul thought it was foolish to believe a dead man could be a Saviour, he was notashamed to continue to preach just such a gospel.He was not ashamed to admit that Christ had died upon a cross, even though this was a death reserved for the most vile of criminals. He considered himself fortunate to be allowed to proclaim these matchless truths (I Tim. 1:12). He loved to tell thestory of a loving, merciful, and forgiving Saviour.

As we look to this psalm of David, we see that he

pleads for others as well as himself. He asks for God's help for all who serve him. I believe that David here shows us some ways in which we can prevent ourselves in ever being ashamed of serving God.

First, v. 2, "O my God, I trust in thee;..." The wise man Solomon says, "whoso putteth his trust in the Lord shall be safe." Again hear David in II Sam. 22:3, "The Lord is my rock, and my fortress, and mydeliverer; The God of my rock; in him will I trust.." Job never stopped trusting God, though he suffered because he was a follower of God. Job says: "Thoughhe slay me, yet will I trust him ..." Look to the reproof of Jerusalem in Zeph. 3:1,2; she trusted not in the Lord. If we will put our complete trust in God,commend our lives to his care and guidance, we will never be ashamed of being ser vants of God,Christians!

Second, in v.4, 5a, we find David telling us to prayfor His guidance, and study His words. God will beour continual guide, but we must allow Him to guide us (Isa. 58:11). We must pray for His guidance,and our humble submi ion. Along with prayer, wemust be studious ser vants of God. II T im. 2:15,study that we can be approved workmen of Godthat needeth not be ashamed. If we will look to the word of God, we can find ALL things that pertainto life, and godliness (II Pet. 1:3). Prayer (I Thess. 5:17), and Study (Hosea 4:6) are important parts of the Christian life. If they are used as God has intended, one will never be ashamed to be a child of

God, and proclaim the gospel of Christ. Third, v.5b, never forget, He is the God of our

salvation. Sometimes we might take this for

granted. Those that are married, remember when

you first met your wife? Your attention and service

was only for her. When you went somewhere, yo

always opened the car door for her, and you always

waited for her. Now that you have been married for

awhile, she opens her own doors, and she has to rush

to catch up with you. What's happened? You have

started taking her for granted. The same is true

with some today concerning the God of our Salva

tion. Peter says that we can completely forget that

we were once purged from our old sins (II Pet. 1:9).

If we fail to grow as Christians should, then we are

taking for granted the sacrifice Christ made, an

the mercy God has shown. Again look to the example

of Israel (Isa. 17:10,11). This condition usually will

come about because we leave our first love (Rev. 3:4,5).Fourth, v.5c, wait on God, serve Him DAILY.

David prayed for himself and all that wait on God.

Paul was a completely obedient servant of God (Rom.

1:1), and he says, "Be ye followers of me, even as I

also am of Christ" (I Cor. 11:1). Our work is a "work

of faith, labor of love." If we are faithful unto death,

He has promised a "crown of life" (Rev. 2:10).

Shouldn't this be enough to make us want others, as

well as ourselves, to serve God, wait on him daily

Let us never be ashamed to be Chr istians, but

rather take a lesson from David; trust in Him, pray

for His guidance and study His word, never forget

He is the God of our salvation, and serve Him faith

fully unto death. Are you ashamed?

— P.O. Box 217

Rochelle, Ill. 61068

PAPER BACK BOOKS AND BOOKLETS

FIRST CENTURY PREACHING BY TWENTIETH CENTURY PREACHERS— Sermon Outlines. Compiled anEdited by Jimmy T uten, Jr. and Floyd Chappelear.

Price $2.25

A STUDY OF AUTHORITY by Billy W. Moore. Good for individual or class study.

Price $ .75

HANDY BIBLE HELPS by Guthrie Dean. A real help forBible students.

Price $ .75 THEOPHILUS by Bob West. A widely used booklet of good lessons by a series of drawings.

Price $1.25

THE MISSION AND MEDIUM OF THE HOLY SPIRIT

by Foy E. Wallace, Jr.

Price $1.00

THE NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH TODAY by LloydMoyer. A good study book for individual or class on thechurch.

Price $1.00

REVIEW OF EVERY GOOD WORK by H. E. Phillips. Areply to D. Ellis Walker's booklet "Every Good Work."

Price $ .25

WOMAN, HER BLESSINGS AND RESPONSIBILITIES byIrene Sowell Foy. An excellent of woman's place in God'splan. Good for individual or class study.

Price $ .75

BAPTISM IN THE SCHEME OF REDEMPTION by L. A.Mott, Jr. One of the Best booklets available on the subjectof baptism. Excellent for individual or class study.

Price $1.00

INDESTRUCTIBLE FOUNDATIONS by Peter J. Wilson. A good book on E vidences and fundamental teaching. E xcellent for home studies.

Price $1.50

THE NEW TESTAMENT CHURCH by Roy E. Cogdill. Anexcellent study book for class or personal study of thLord's church. Widely used since 1938.

Price $1.50 Cloth bound $2.00

FLORIDA COLLEGE LECTURE OUTLINE of 1968. Three lectures by Roy Cogdill on the church; three lectures byFranklin T. Puckett on the Holy Spirit; and three lectures by James W. Adams on the place of Human Organizations.Other good lecture outlines in addition.

Price $2.00

THE CHURCH; It's Establishment, Apostasy & Restoration by Jimmy Tuten, Jr. A good study in highlights in church history.

Price $1.25

THE CHURCH & THE ELDERSHIP by J. T. Smith. Thematerial which was to be used in a debate with Charles A. Holt on the subject, but was called off by Holt.

Price $1.00

WALKING BY FAITH by Roy E. Cogdill. One of the best studies in the institutional problems that have corruptethe church and her work. Widely used for personal andclass study.

Price $1.25 Cloth bound $1.75

THE WOMAN'S COVERING by James P. Needham and Hiram Hutto on I Cor. II.

Price $ .50

THRASHER-GARRETT DEBATE on Unconditional Salvation and Apostasy. Christian vs Primitive Baptist.

Price $1.50