LET US AWAKE OUT OF SLEEP
In Romans 13:11 Paul said, "... knowing the time,that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: fornow is our salvation nearer than when we believed."
We certainly wouldn't deny that evil times areupon us. That there is a need to take a firm stand against all forms of error is also admitted by mostall and yet when we begin to warn and to admonishthose around about us, when we begin to point outthe danger signs that are everywhere, many seemto think that we are reactionaries, trouble makers or worse.
Many concerned brethren have, for sometime,tried to warn us of the "modernistic" and "liberalistic" trend that is taking over many churches acrossour land. (We use these terms in relation to attitudestowards the Bible as verbally inspired and thus authoritative for ALL that we do either individuallyor collectively.) Pentecostal type movements (speaking in tongues) are increasing at an alarming rate.Fellowship with denominations is being not onlypreached but practiced. The church is engaging inmany benevolent and evangelist (sponsoring churchtype) practices for which there is absolutely no Scriptural authority and its advocates would have us believe that since there is no pattern then it's allright, so let's just forget our differences and worktogether. After all, we do many things for which we have no authority (but just what is it that wedo without authority that God approves of?). ThankGod for faithful brethren who have both the courage and conviction to stand firm and to demand Bible authority for all we believe and all that wepractice (individually and collectively).
We have not stood alone in our cry for a returnto the old paths for there have been and will continueto be brethren (though few) who will not bendagainst the tides of digression. Yes, we have beencriticized and spoken against, we have been accused of things that are untrue but these things have beentaken in stride for so they treated our Lord. However, the point I want to make is that others are beginning to sound the alarm. Others with whom wehave differed and still differ are becoming concernedwith the modern philosophy among brethren and what's more they are now speaking out against it.Wonder what will happen next?
Now brethren, "WHO IS THE REACTIONIST?" The thin gray line that many feel they can walkcomfortably isn't in reality really there. It's black or white and always has been; we either have authority or we don't. A thing is either right or it iswrong, and it makes no difference how sincere ormisguided or misunderstood we might be.
In Romans 3:23 Paul wrote that "all were sinners." Now the Jew might argue that God had beent6o demanding with them and that if God had leftthem alone as He did the Gentiles, just maybe theywouldn't be guilty before Him now; after all, theystill had zeal for God and God hadn't told them not to raise their traditions so high. Then the Gentile might argue that God had given special treatmentto the Jew and if He (God) had given them a law ever so exact and detailed as He did the Jews, justmaybe they wouldn't now stand condemned. Afterall, they believed in what they were doing. Humanreasoning would say that the Gentile didn't have the chance that the Jew had. The point is, that no matter what kind of reasoning the Jews or the Gentilesmight use, the fact stood and that was that both(Jew and Gentile) were guilty of sin in the sightof God.
This has ever been man's folly, to try to chart hisown course and to justify whatever it might be thathe wants to do. God's ways seem hard simply because man has walked so far from them for so manyyears and done so many things that God has alwayscondemned that he is blinded by his own wisdom.And brethren, the problem hasn't changed. We can make this same application in every area where sin reigns (and where it reigns it rules). It makes nodifference to what we direct our thoughts, as far asthe church is concerned. "The Social Gospel" — reason tells us it attracts more people thus justified (byhuman reason). "The Sponsoring Church" — reason tells us it is a way little churches can do far morethus justified (by human reason). "The Centralized Control Plan" — reason tells us it is a way that wecan reach hundreds and hundreds of lost souls that we wouldn't be able to reach otherwise, we can feed more, care for more, support more and on and onthus justified (by human reason) „ Take a look at some of these churches that wear the name "Church of Christ" with their Sponsoring church programs,their ball teams, their homes for unwed mothers,their counseling centers, their centralization, their oversight under the oversight of someone else and see if you can find anything even remotely like it inall of the New Testament. They haven't lost their autonomy, they have given it away and don't evenknow it. YES, blinded by their own wisdom would be a fitting epitath for the stone that will one daybe set over many of these so-called "young princes."
Brethren, we aren't against young people having a good time but we are against the church sponsoring or supporting it. We aren't against homes forunwed mothers but we are against the church sponsoring it. We aren't against cooperation or any ofthe things that we have mentioned. BUT WE AREAGAINST DOING THAT FOR WHICH WE HAVE NO BIBLE AUTHORITY. Were you aware of thefact that there is not one example in all of the New Testament of one church sending to another churchfor the purpose of preaching the Gospel? Did you know what when one church did send to another church (to relieve a physical need) that just as soonas that need was met the sending church quit sending. Preachers were supported directly by individuals, by a church or churches and in no other way save when it became necessary for the man to workwith his hands. But, brethren, look at the way thingsare being done today. Again we ask WHERE IS THENEW TESTAMENT AUTHORITY? Brethren have reached a point where they don't even want to studyour differences and I say this to their shame.
Let us hear well the words of Paul, for indeed itis high time that we awoke to the conditions aroundus and in particular let us awake to the fact that thefirst and foremost purpose of the church was, is and ever will be, to declare the manifold wisdom of God.PREACH THE WORD. The benevolent activities of the church is an outgrowth of the above and thusSECONDARY. And, friend, where in the New Testament did any church ever help anyone other thananother saint? As individual members of the bodyof Christ we are to help all those we are able toand this is taught throughout the Bible, but tapping the church's till every time there is a need notonly is without scriptural authority it also robs the child of God of the blessings and joy of becominginvolved with the needs of others. Yes, we need to awake while there is yet light and before eternal darkness settles around us.
Route 1, Box 926
Bremerton, Wash. 98310
A WORD TO THOSE WHO WRITE ARTICLES AND NEWS REPORTS
We are glad to receive articles and news reportsof interest and encouragement to the readers. However, many of these cannot be used because of themanner in which they are written. It is difficult toread the handwriting of some, and the typesetterswill almost refuse to try to set the type until it isrewritten on a typewriter. Some are typed singlespaced and marked over until it cannot be read. Someare one continuous paragraph, changing from one thought to another without any indication of havingdone so. Others are written on typewriters with ribbons so far gone .that the letters can hardly be read.
The past few months I have received a large number of news items (actually they are mimeographedmonthly reports distributed to churches or individuals) that give detailed reports and requests forfunds to assist some preacher. I am asked to publish it as is, or rewrite it to be included in the news section. In most cases I could not rewrite it because I do not know the real situation, and I do not write anything above my name that I do not know something about and approve it. Especially is this true of news items or announcements. In every news report the man whose name appears with the report isresponsible for its contents. The same is true of anyarticle.
We are happy to receive articles on all Bible subjects and when possible we will publish them. Weurge you to send news items, but keep them to the point and do not send general reports for me to reduce to suitable size and to rewrite. We sell no advertising except for the church directory pages.
QUESTION: Will you please discuss how one congregation may start another congregation and be scriptural? May the original church buy a lot, setaside a fund for building at the new site, when asyet no congregation has been started? In otherwords, may one congregation plan, buy, and build ameeting house for the purpose of starting a new church and not move there itself? Should the new congregation be formed first and then plan, buy, andbuild on their own ? — (Initials withheld by request
— M.E.P.)
ANSWER: Many of the matters involved in answering the above questions concern matters of expediency. This means that human judgment is involved, which judgment, of course, must be within the realm of divine authority — all expedients mustfirst be lawful (I Cor. 10:23).
In apostolic days new churches were started by anindividual or individuals either going out on theirown or being supported by some church or churches,and preaching the gospel in some place where therewas no church. When, as a result, souls obeyed thegospel and purposed to function together as a church, a new congregation existed. When thesesouls obeyed the gospel, they were, of course, added to the church of our Lord (Acts 2:47). This church to which they were added was not a local church,but rather the church in the aggregate or in the general sense (Matt. 16:18; Eph. 1:22,23). In such instances, there may be an understanding on the partof all concerned that those obeying the gospel willwork and worship together as a local church, buttheir obedience to the gospel, of itself, does not necessarily begin a local church, as the following factswill reveal.
The sum total of divine revelation concerning localchurches reveals the following facts pertinent to theissue under study.
- Membership in a local congregation is established by mutual agreement on the part of the faithful children of God involved (Acts 9:26).
- A local church may exist for a while withoutbeing fully organized, i.e., without elders and deacons (Acts 14:21-23).
- Congregational autonomy must be maintainedby each church (Acts 14:23; 20:28; I Pet. 5:2).This means that there can be no organic connectionbetween churches. Furthermore, this precludes one church exercising any control or oversight over another church in any of its affairs.
- Congregational equality is to be maintained (II Cor. 8:13, 14). This means that one church may
receive from another church, if and when the objective is to bring about equality — "freedom fromwant." The expressions "freedom from want" and "that there may be equality" do not mean that eachchurch should have the same number of dollars in its treasury, but rather that each church shouldhave power to meet the obligations that are peculiarly its own. Lacking this power it is in "want" inthe scriptural sense, and may, therefore, receive from another until power to meet such obligationshas been established. Thus, "equality" is brought about.
With this background of knowledge, we should beable to answer the questions at hand. One churchmay scripturally start another church if and whenall actions involved harmonize with the above mentioned divine principles.
One church may start another church by havingfellowship with those who go forth preaching the gospel. I realize that the starting of the new churchis the result of preaching the gospel; that whetherwe speak of a church preaching the gospel or establishing a church depends upon whether we are talking about the work done or the results of that work. The point to be observed is that there is a sense inwhich one church may stare another church.
One church may start another church by affectinga peaceful division, sometimes called "swarming." In such instance, one part remains at the formerplace for worship and continues to function as a local church, while the other part moves to a new location for worship and thereafter functions as alocal church. This action is justified upon thegrounds of point One above, namely, membership ina local church is established or may be withdrawn voluntarily and by mutual agreement. Furthermore,all other principles mentioned above should be carefully observed. This would preclude the following:
- One church appointing elders or deacons for the new church, either before or after its beginning.
- One church exercising control, in any way, overthe property of the new congregation from the time of its beginning.
- One church maintaining a treasury for both
- congregations.
- One church or eldership overseeing the new church, in any of its affairs, until the new churchis fully organized with its own elders and deacons.
- One church selecting the preacher for the new congregation. This, however, would not preclude one church supporting a preacher for the new church. Under these conditions the preacher forthe new church may be selected and approved bythe new church, and at the same time be subjectto the approval of the church supporting him. Nochurch should be expected to support any preacherit did not approve.
While this does not cover all things that would beprecluded by the principles already laid down, thesedefinitely identify matters that would be in violation of the fundamental principle of congregation autonomy.
From a positive viewpoint, the following may bedone by the church which anticipates and plans forthe beginning of a new church by peacefully dividing. It should be clearly understood that the purposeof such division would be to further the work of evangelism, which work, of course, is lawful. It would be the sentiment of all concerned that greaterthings can be accomplished to the glory of the Lordby forming the two churches, instead of continuingas one. The human judgment involved simply determines how the church should proceed or which is thebest way to accomplish the divine objective withoutviolating any divine principle.
In planning for such the original church may setaside funds with which to begin the new church. Itmay purchase property, build a building, or furnish other facilities with which to begin the new congregation. All of this may be done, provided there istransfer of all such at the time of the beginning ofthe new church. This would be necessary to avoidviolation of congregational autonomy. It is my persuasion that such may be done for two reasons, atleast. First, prior to the beginning of the new church,both worked together as one in planning for andsharing in the expenses necessary for such beginning. Every principle of honor, fairness, and integrity demands such under the above described circumstances. Second, the principle of congregationalequality justifies it. Hardly any church would beable, of itself, to begin by "swarming" with all the material necessities commensurate with its needs and the standards of the time. After all, human judgment determines when and how much to givethe needy. How thin must one's shoes be before he needs a new pair? How bare must the cupboard bebefore groceries are needed? This, of course, would not justify giving one a Cadillac automobile to supply his needs for transportation. Judgment commensurate with the standards of the time, country, etc.prevails in such instances. It is no less true with achurch.
In forming a new church under the above circumstances, I would suggest the following as a matterof expediency or good judgment. First, that the original church know the nucleus with which the newchurch begins well enough to determine with a goodmeasure of confidence its future security in relationto truth. Second, that the new congregation begin with sufficient number to establish a mainstream of action in soundness, otherwise, new members, notfirmly grounded in truth, might sweep it into digression and the investment be lost. Remember, no organic ties can exist between the churches nor can control be exercised one over the other — even for the purpose of future security in relation to truth.For this reason good judgment demands following the above suggestions.
REGARDING CHURCH MEMBERSHIP
WHAT CHURCH?
In this article I make no reference to what one
must do to become a Methodist, a Baptist, a Presby
terian, etc.
I am discussing what one must do to become a
member of the church that one may read about in
Matt. 16:18, etc.
TWO FUNDAMENTALS
I note here two fundamental teachings of the New
Testament: first, the conditions on which we are re
deemed from our past sins are the very conditions
that admit us into the body of Christ, Acts 2:38,47;
second, and consequently, membership in the body
of Christ is just as essential as redemption from
past sins.
Therefore, when we determine the conditions on
which we are saved, we will have at the same time
determined the requirements of membership in the
New Testament church.
THREE SOURCES
From three sources we may determine the requirements of church membership: first, from the teaching of Christ; second, from the teaching of theapostles of Christ; third, from the examples of conversion recorded in Acts of Apostles.
TEACHING OF JESUS
Christ tells us in Mark 16:16 that in order to be saved one must believe and be baptized. He does not say he who believes only shall be saved; neither doesHe say that he who is baptized only shall be saved.
Both faith and baptism are made essentials to sal
vation. Baptism is as essential as faith, in procuring
remission of sins.
But these very conditions laid down by Christ are
said in Acts 2:38, 47 to constitute one a member of
the Lord's church. Consequently, what Christ de
mands in Mark 16:16 is what makes a person a
member of the church.
TEACHING OF APOSTLES
In Acts 2:38 the apostle Peter affirms that to thebeliever, repentance and baptism are both joined tosecure the same result; namely, the remission ofsins.
Acts 2:47 teaches us that the obedient Jews who
received the Word became members of the Lord's
church. Consequently, the conditions of Acts 2:38 are the requirements of membership in the New
Testament body.
We all concede that being "of Christ" is equivalent
to "being a Christian. But Paul the apostle teaches us
in I Cor. 1:13 that to be "of Christ," Christ must
have been crucified for us, and we must have been
baptized in the name of Christ. Consequently, in
order to be a Christian one must, by faith in the
crucified Christ, be baptized in His name. But, inas
much as being a Christian is equivalent to being a
member of the church (Acts 2:38,47), the teaching
of I Cor. 1:13 prescribes, similarly, the requirements
of church membership.
CONVERSIONS OF ACTS
The Acts conversions tell the same story over and
over again: people who became Christians, heard
and believed the Gospel; repented of their sins, were
baptized. This is apparent from even a casual read
ing of Acts 2:38; 8:12; 18:8; 22:16, and many other
Acts passages.Inasmuch as we have observed already that being
a Christian is equivalent to being a member of the
body of Christ, it must follow that every case of con
version recorded in Acts of Apostles is a concrete
example of what one must do today to become a
member of the New Testament church.
Well, it was bound to happen. Those who have opposed the unreasonable, unscientific and unscriptural theories of evolution through the years, havecalled upon the evolutionists to explain why man ceased to evolve; why he doesn't continue to improve. Now comes the report that man is continuing to evolve and improve. In an article out of Los Angeles, dated January 4, 1971, we find the following:
"Man is not the end product of evolution. In fact,according to a University of California at Los Angeles social theorist, man is already obsolescent.
"He said the next phase of evolution will be that of super-intelligence and super-consciousness, in which man will have faded into the background.
"Man will be part of the backdrop, much as loweranimals and plants are part of the backdrop now."
These and other statements in the article were from Robert McCracken, assistant professor of anthropology at U.C.L.A.
From what I observe from out that way, somepeople have haired over and headed back to the animals ! Anyway, I don't plan to rush out and buy myself a collar and leash, for this process will probablytake another fifty million years.
Out in Hollywood, a famous movie actress filed fordivorce while expecting her first child. She said, "Ibelieve in marriage, and I feel sure that another man will come along who will want to marry me.Then the baby will be lucky enough to have twofathers."
And all this time I thought that a child was lucky
when it had only one father and one mother.
"Permissive society a bane for nudist camps." So
reads the headline of a recent article in the news
papers. It seems that there are so many half-naked
or immodestly dressed people in our society that the
nudist camps are about to go out of business. The article said:
"Nudist camps have fallen on difficult times sincethe advent of the permissive society in the United States.
"The sexual revolution is killing us," says Mel Hocker, echoing sentiments of nudist camp opera
tors throughout California. Hocker explained the
reasons for the recent disinterest in the camps.
"I've never been known to be a prude, and I'm one
of the last persons on earth that would consider
censorship. But, the pornographic movies now being
shown in all the neighborhood theaters, well, they're
just too much. That's what's making nudism in
America passe — the new libertine movies, the top
less-bottomless bars, the whole sexual syndrome."
What an indictment! Society is a public nudistcamp. If you don't believe it, take a look at the newsstand at the drug store, or visit the super market,or look down the pew in the average church building.
In a recent bulletin of one of the congregations inLittle Rock, I noted that their attendance on a Sunday morning was 471 and the following Wednesdaynight it was 188. That church has just spent approximately five hundred thousand dollars on a building, so it seems that their spiritual growth isnot keeping pace with the material. That's true inso many places these days, which reminds me of a statement from Alexander Campbell which I read somewhere one time. He said that you could tell thestrength of the church by the Sunday morning audience ; the strength of the preacher by the Sunday evening audience; and the strength of the Lord bythe Wednesday evening audience. There's a lot oftruth in that. From what I have observed, the Wednesday evening audience is the backbone of a congregation, without which it could not grow.
It is interesting to take time off from readingAmerican newspapers deploring the sorry status oflife on our college campuses to read of the methodof one British college in dealing with the threats ofmilitants.
"At the University of Oxford's Wadam College,a group of militant student activists recently pre
sented a list of non-negotiable demands to the ad
ministration and threatened direct action if their
demands were not met. They received this responsefrom the Warden of the college:
" 'We note your threat to take what you call 'direct action' unless your demands are immediately
met. We feel that it is only sporting to let you know
that our governing body includes three experts in
chemical warfare, two ex-commandos skilled with
dynamite and in tutoring prisoners, four qualified
marksmen in both small arms and rifles, two ex-
artillerymen, one holder of the Victoria Cross, four
karate experts, and a chaplain. The governing body
has authorized me to tell you that we look forward
with confidence to what you call a 'confrontation,'
and, I may say, even with anticipation.' "
If we had some college officials with such courage
and strength, some of these misguided rebels would
hide behind their shocks of hair and keep quiet. They
are what the Bible calls implacable (Rom. 1:31),
and there is nothing to be gained by trying to meet
their demands. The majority of them cannot manage their own lives, much less a college.
"For if ye love them which love you, what rewardhave ye? do not even the publicans the same? Andif ye salute your brethren only, what do ye morethan others? Do not even the publicans so?" (Matt.5:46, 47)
Some of God's demands are not difficult for most of us to obey. We're commanded to love our families and friends. Most people possess natural affectionwhich makes this an easy requirement. But love ourenemies (those who revile us, and persecute us, andsay all manner of evil against us falsely . . . Matt.5:11) is not an easy requirement.
It is not our purpose in this article to define whatreal love for friends and enemies is. Regardless ofwhat it is, it's easier to love friends than to love enemies. The Lord's lesson was built upon this fact. His point was: if we faithfully fulfill those requirements WHICH ARE EASY FOR US, and fail in thetrue challenges of our faith, WHAT DO WE MORETHAN OTHERS?
I. Application may be made to the numerous departures from the old paths by so many churches "of Christ." In a recent campaign in Louisville, Ford Philpot, a Methodist, used a number of entertainersas a drawing card. One was a former Miss America who has made several public statements regardingher religious faith. These were used to "get people out." Mr. Philpot reasoned, "We can't preach the gospel to them if we don't get them to come out."
Even if Philpot were really preaching the gospel,a smittering of common sense and a casual acquaintance with the scriptures would tell him that peoplewho are drawn by carnal enticements are carnal.Their hearts are not cultivated to receive the pureseed of the kingdom.
In a quest for numbers, the denominations have
long resorted to providing dining halls, pool tables
and bingo parlors. May we ask, WHAT DO THEY
MORE THAN OTHERS? You can find dining rooms
in restaurants, pool tables in pool halls, and bingo
games in public houses. What do they more? They
throw in an impure, adulterated form of the gospel
of Christ.
For the past several years such has not been confined to the ranks of Catholicism and denominationalism. Many churches which wear the name of Christ sponsor everything from archery tournaments to Easter egg hunts. They operate everything frombabysitting services to millinery design classes, andbuild everything from T.V. lounges to gymnasiums.WHAT DO THEY MORE THAN OTHERS? The answer: they give lip-service to the slogan, "We
speak where the Bible speaks, and we're silent where the Bible is silent."
II. Application may be made to personal temptation. Picture two men. One is an alcoholic; the otheris a half-hearted member of the church.
No one likes a drunk but other drunks when they're drunk. The bartender will sell him booze while he's sober and then roll him out for being drunk. His wife and children cringe from him infear. Tomorrow he will hate himself and promise tonever drink again.
Mr. Lukewarm may swell his chest and say something like, "If I weren't bigger than the bottle, I'd crawl under a rock." But then Sunday evening or Wednesday evening roils around and there's a good
T.V. program, an easy chair, and a hard day tomorrow. He yields to the temptation and fails to assemble with the saints.
WHAT DOES HE MORE THAN OTHERS? One sells his soul for a pint of booze and the other for a
T.V. program. They both serve the same master.
III. Application may be made to attitudes towardthe Bible: "Wherefore lay apart all filthiness andsuperfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. But be ye doers of the word, and not hearersonly, deceiving your own selves" (James 1:21,22).
Until Johann Gutenburg invented printing frommovable type, Bibles were handwritten. During the dark ages, many paid a month's wages for the privilege of renting a Bible for twenty-four hours. We can be sure that those Bibles were used more in that twenty-four hours than most are now used in an average lifetime.
After Bibles began to be printed, the Roman Catholic Church seized and burned many copies.Jesuits boasted of burning 60,000 Bibles in 1637 inBohemia.
Most people's sense of decency is shocked at the idea of a Bible burning. I'm sure that the reaction would be hot and heavy if a church staged one. People would be up in arms and the incident would probably be nationally covered in the news.
It is somewhat strange that when people try toabide by the Bible they're scorned and ridiculed but if they decided to destroy the Bible, they would become targets for every form of rebuke and censor.
WHAT DO YE MORE THAN OTHERS?- Manymembers of the church who consistently fail to readand study their Bibles would become very critical ifsome should decide to burn Bibles. But the word of God does no good just lying on the coffee table.James said that it is "the ENGRAFTED word that is able to save the soul."
Conclusion: We need to examine ourselves that we condemn not ourselves in judging others.
In an editorial in the October 1968 issue of Searching The Scriptures, brother H. E. Phillips wrote: "Diverse views on Bible subjects ought to be discussed with frankness and candor. This is the onlyway to ascertain the truth and sift out the error.Some questions are foolish and should be avoided because no revelation from God is available to settle the matter . . . Other questions, however, can be settled by the word of God and should be fairly andhonestly discussed with a view to learning what God has revealed on the questions."
It is within this context that I make reply to a recent article by brother J. T. Smith dealing with the question: "Was Cornelius Baptized in the Holy Spirit?" Brother Smith was replying to a previousarticle of mine on the subject. I hold brother Smithin the same high esteem that he expressed of mein the introduction of his article.
"NEED" OR "NECESSITY"
I made no such argument in my article ascribedto me by brother Smith, which would allow the limitation placed on it by him, nor the conclusion hedrew from it. It is true that I pointed out from God's word (Luke 24:48-59; Acts 1:8) that the apostleswere to be "witnesses" of the Lord, but the contextof my article will show that this mission extendedfar beyond the Lord's resurrection. They were tobe "witnesses" of the Son when the "Comforter" was sent unto them (John 15:26-27) ; they were tobe "witnesses" of "all things which he did both inthe land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem"(Acts 10:39).Jesus chose the apostles for this mission while hewas yet with them (John 15:27). No one else, only the apostles, were to be "witnesses" in this sense ofthe term. So brother Smith's argument on the FIVEHUNDRED BRETHREN constitutes his own argument, and his conclusion isn't drawn from any argument I made.
Jesus identified Holy Spirit baptism as "The Spirit of Truth" (John 15:26; 16:13). But He only guided the apostles (no one else) in the way of truth. HadCornelius also, as we are told, received the same"overwhelming", does it not follow that he, too,would have been "guided into all truth?" Inspiration's purpose was served in the apostles, the designated agents, and thus there was no need for suchin Cornelius.
COULD NOT RECEIVE THE SPIRIT
Again this is brother Smith's argument, not mine. I did not say nor imply in a single statement thatCornelius "COULD NOT RECEIVE THE SPIRIT." In fact, I conceded, yea even affirmed, that Cornelius received the Holy Spirit, and this direct fromheaven. My point was that Je3us promised the "Comforter" (Baptism in the Holy Spirit) only to Hisapostles, and I was explicit in my affirmation that Jesus withheld this from the WORLD. The argu
ment still stands unanswered and unchallenged. Brother Smith says, "Cornelius and his household DID RECEIVE the Holy Spirit, call it whatever youwill, a gift or baptism." But I prefer to call it whatit was, and no where is it referred to as a "baptism."
PURPOSE OF HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM
Brother Smith says, "His (Cornelius' — LES)baptism was to fulfill the prophecy of Joel and to establish the kingdom, or allow entrance into it, forthe Gentiles." I pointed out previously that Joel didnot prophesy "Holy Spirit Baptism," but rather predicted the "fact" that God would "pour out of hisspirit on all flesh." Brother Smith failed, because itisn't there, to show that Joel predicted the "form"in which the Spirit would be "poured out." Instead of assuming what I emphatically denied, why didnot my brother produce the evidence from Joel tosupport his statement? THIS is the way we "proveall things." Why does he assume that which needsproof ? Is our brother trying to say there was a kingdom established for the Jews, and another for theGentiles ? Read his statement again! Is he saying in his statement on Acts 2:39 that Peter promised HolySpirit Baptism (Outpouring of the Spirit) to theobedient of Acts 2:38? Read his statement again!
Brother Smith makes an argument for receptionof Holy Spirit baptism by Cornelius "for a differentpurpose," based on the baptism of Jesus. He reasonslike this: The apostles were baptized in the HolySpirit for one purpose, and Cornelius for a differentpurpose. He feels there is a parallel in principle inthe baptism of Jesus at the hands of John, as allothers were baptized of John for a different purpose.But Jesus did not receive John's baptism. It is almostinconceivable that one who has studied carefully thebaptism of Jesus Christ would take the position asdid brother Smith, that Jesus "was baptized ofJohn's baptism." The baptism of Jesus stands alonein the New Testament. There isn't another case like it on record. When Jesus came to John to be baptized, John demurred at the request. Jesus was baptized with the "exception" to John's baptism. All who were baptized of John's baptism did it for thesame purpose. When they came to John to be baptized of him "confessing their sins," John baptizedthem "unto repentance." for "the remission of sins."It was impossible that Jesus could receive THIS baptism, for obvious reasons. Neither were there different purposes for Holy Spirit baptism.
ACTS 11 AND ACTS 2 EQUAL
Here our brother attempts to equate "gift" ofActs 11 with "baptism" of Acts 2. But he shows himself to be inconsistent by refusing to allow the Pentecostals the same with reference to "gift" in Acts 2:38 Also, it is pointed out to Denominationalpreachers that their baptism is unscriptural becauseit isn't "FOR THE RIGHT PURPOSE." Yet we deviate from this principle in the case of Cornelius,don't we? What is the "gift" spoken of by Peter inActs 10 and 11? Obviously, it is the gift of tongues.He makes this clear in Acts 10:44-46. Verse 44 states that the "Holy Spirit fell on them whichheard the word," a whole house of unbelievers. Verse45 expresses astonishment of the Jews that "on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the HolySpirit." Verse 46 identifies the "gift" that was "poured out" as the "gift of tongues." This is too obvious for anyone to miss. If this is Holy Spiritbaptism, the Spirit Himself selected a poor word todescribe it! Also it means that a whole house of unbelievers (Cornelius' kinsmen and near friends — Acts 10:24) were recipients of the "Comforter,"which Jesus solemnly promised only to His apostles(John 14:17) The obligation falls to every personwho advocates Holy Spirit Baptism at the House ofCornelius to identify that which Jesus said "THE WORLD CANNOT RECEIVE." What is it or what was it?
The "like" or same gift was the gift of tongues(Acts 10:44-46), and this gift also accompanied thebaptism of the Spirit on the apostles as recorded inActs 2. However, tongues speaking was the limit ofmiraculous manifestation in the Cornelius incident. But the apostles were inspired of God to declare and"witness" to the truth, and endowed with powerfrom on high. Cornelius had to be taught of Peter,and if Cornelius received the "Comforter" as we are told, we have one inspired man instructing anotherinspired man (and all that were in his house) inwhat to do to obey God! Are YOU ready for that ?
CONCLUSION
I have already shown that Joel did not predict"Holy Spirit Baptism." Brother Smith adds the baptism part. Therefore, he isn't right in his conclusion,due to the false premise. There was no promise, need, purpose to be served, or evidence to supportHoly Spirit Baptism to anyone other than the apostles of Christ. "Prove all things."
3368 William Tell Dr.
Memphis, Tenn. 38127
BROCK-CLEMENTS DEBATE
Paul Brock and Jim Clements have signed propositions for a discussion of four nights to be held inthe Middle Valley church building, Thrasher Pike,Hixson, Tenn. The discussion will be conducted May17, 18, 20, 21, 1971. at 7:30 p.m. Paul Brock is endorsed by the North Hixson church and Jim Clements is endorsed by the Middle Valley church.
The first two nights will be the church supportfrom the treasury of schools such as David Lipscombcollege. The last two nights the proposition will bethe church support of human institutions such asChattanooga Children's home.
Each speaker will have 40 minutes each night tospeak and then 40 minutes to answer questions fromthe audience. The questions will be given to the moderators who will read the questions and call upon the speaker to whom it is addressed to answer it.
Any who may want further information about thedebate or places to stay for those who plan to attend, please contact Kent Harrell who preaches forthe North Hixson church. Write to him at P.O. Box 143 or call: 877-9804 or 877-1706.
Larry L. Dickens, 10 Conley Street, Greenville,
S. C, 29605 — Columbia, S. C: The North Columbia church of Christ is now meeting at 928 ColumbiaCollege Drive, Columbia, S. C. The is the only congregation in Columbia that has taken a stand againstthe present digressions. If you know of Christiansliving in the Columbia area, at the University of
S. C, or at Fort Jackson, who previously worshipped with a faithful congregation, write to them and encourage them to take a stand for the truth, now!If you have friends or relatives (whether membersor not) who need to be visited by the saints there,contact M. C. Reynolds (796-0873) or Danny Holton(254-4697).
Taylors, S. C.: If you know of someone who needs to be visited in Anderson-Greenville-Spartanburgcounties, S. C, send their names and addresses tothe Taylors church of Christ, Box 506, Taylors, S. C.29687, and they WILL be contacted.
James L. Denison, 3402 Henderson Blvd., Tampa,Fla., March 29, 1971 — Luther Blackmon closed the best attended meeting we have had on March 12. Iclosed a meeting at the Palm River congregation inTampa on March 26. I begin one at Westside in Tallahassee, Fla., on April 5 and another at Valley Hiin San Antonio, Tex., on April 26.
University Hills church of Christ, 3098 South Glencoe, Denver, Colo. 80222 — Last year's meetings were held by Bro. Richard Holloway of McAlister, Okla., and Bro. Henry Smith of Spencer, Ind.,with one soul being added to the Lord's body. Since then, three families have identified themselves with the University Hills congregation, making a totalof 11 families. Our meetings for 1971 are as follows:April 4-11. Bro. Gordon Pennock of Aurora, Ill.; July 25-Aug. 1, Bro. Jimmy Thomas of Hueytown, Ala.; Fall meeting, Bro. Ken Stamper of Redwood City, Calif. We are looking forward to these meetings with enthusiasm.
On March 12, we are starting a training class forthe young men of the congregation. We hope thatthese classes will benefit not only the young, but theolder as well.
We are looking forward to having Bro. David Harkrider of Ensley, Ala., come and labour with usthis summer.
FAMILY RELATIONSHIPS SERIES
Daniel L. Tam, Ft. Myers, Fla. — The first of the year we invited James Cope to speak to us concerning the responsibilities inherent in being a part ofa family. This series of lessons has been especiallydesigned by brother Cope and concerns itself withthe parent-child relationship. The problems and responsibilities of both parents and children were setforth in the light of God's word in such a way as tochallenge the honest heart, whether young or old,to rise up and deal righteously one with another.Brother Cope put into words that which most Christians think about, and stirred our minds with new avenues of thought. In the age of the "generation gap," when many promote the idea of separationbetween the thinking of young and old, and considercommunication between parent and child a thing ofthe past, it was refreshing and strengthening tohear some straight talk from the book of God.
SPECIAL SERIES IN BROOKSVILLE, FLA.
Theme: "Restoring New Testament Christianity"
May 3-7, 1971, 7:30 p.m.Monday, May 3: "Restoring New Testament Authority vs. Human Creeds," James R. CopeTuesday, May 4: "Restoring New Testament Unity
and Names vs. The Ecumenical Movement,"
Louis Garrett Wednesday, May 5: "Restoring New Testament Worship vs. Will Worship," D. W. BlackThursday, May 6: "Restoring New Testament Or
ganization and Mission vs. The Social Gospel,"
H. E. Phillips
Friday, May 7: "Restoring New Testament Termsof Church Membership (Conversion) vs. DirectOperation of The Holy Spirit * The Faith OnlyDoctrine," Jim Daniel
On the Lord's day following a summation of thelessons will be presented by Kenneth E. Thomas,the local evangelist with the Brooksville church.
PREACHER NEEDED
The church at Kirkland, Ill., desires to secure theservices of a full time evangelist. Please contact:Bill Beasley, Kirkland, Ill., phone: (815) 522-6148 or Del Bassett, 1210 Commercial St., Sycamore, Ill.60178, phone: (815) 895-4869.
James L. Denison, 3402 Henderson Blvd., Tampa,Fla. — My son, Deryl, desires to do fill-in preachingthis summer for congregations within driving distance of Tampa, while their preacher is away onvacation or in meetings. Deryl will be a junior inhigh school next term. If interested, call 839-1422 or 876-2237.
PREACHER WANTED
Small self-supporting church, actively teachingthrough our bulletin, newspaper ads, and personalwork. Currently supporting the Lord's work elsewhere, and have several members wanting to improve their teaching and preaching ability. A threebedroom house provided, salary open, and will paymoving expenses. We need a mature man willing towork in a mission field. Please contact church of Christ c/o Bill Norovich, P.O. Box 355, Racine, Wis.53401. Call 633-0057 or 637-5511. James M. Smelser.
Ward Hogland, Box 166, Greenville, Texas 75401 — Twelve have been baptized here at WalnutStreet within the last ten days. Nine responded during our meeting with S. Leonard Tyler. Three more responded on Wednesday night following the meeting. Brother Tyler did his work well during themeeting. Dates on some of my meetings for 1971have been set, including: Ave. B, Seminole, Tex.;Springhill, La.; Huntsville, Ala.; Grand Saline, Tex.; Levelland, Texas. I am now in my tenth year withthis good church.
Flavil F. Wallace, Rt. 2, Box 263, Gordon, Ga.31031 — I have been preaching part time for a small congregation in Irwinton, Ga., since the first of theyear but would like to return to full time work. Ihave been preaching for more than 17 years, including both part and full time work, working with congregations in Michigan, Florida and Georgia. If possible, I would like to locate somewhere in the southbut would consider work elsewhere. I can be contacted at the above address or phone (912) 986-3431.
William W. Andrews, 2715 S.W. 5th St., Boynton Beach, Fla. 33435 —The church of Christ in Boca Raton, Fla., is in need of a full-time preacher to beginwork by July 1. This congregation is small in number, strong in faith, hard at work and needing assistance. This wealthy college town provides us a difficult but challenging field. Adequate support available. If interested contact Horace Hartsell, 1000
N.W. 6th Dr., Boca Raton, Fla. 33432 or phone:
(305) 391-6325. G. R. Rutherford, 2015 Pisgah Road, North Augusta, S. C. 29841 — After many prayers and manymonths of work and planning, a new congregationof the Lord's people has been established in the Augusta, Ga., area. We shall be meeting temporarily in the Martinez Community Center approximately two miles northwest of Interstate 20 on WashingtonRoad in Martinez, Ga. Due to the innovation of liberalism into many of the churches, we felt it necessary to begin a new work that is so much needed.This will be the first, and only, congregation of theLord's people in Columbia County, Ga. The placeof meeting is only a few minutes' drive from downtown Augusta. There are approximately 150,000 people in the Augusta area, plus Ft. Gordon area; and the opportunities are unlimited for good. This is theonly conservative church in East Georgia. We havefrom 12 to 20 in attendance. The church here, by itsown contribution, is able to rent the building, pay for a listing in the newspaper, and take care of otherexpenditures locally.
We are in need of someone to move to Augustaand work full-time with this new congregation. Ifany congregation desirous of using part of theirmoney in a good and rewarding work, we feel muchgood could be done here in the Lord's work. We needa faithful family to work with us. We feel that withthe right man, the work here could be self-supporting in a matter of months. If any congregation cangive part, or all, financial support to this work, wewould appreciate any consideration. Also, if anycongregation knows of a good man suitable for such,please have him contact us. We solicit your prayersin this new work. If you know of anyone in this area,or anyone moving to this area, please have themcontact us or advise us of their address.
NOTICE!
I have 8 complete sets and several additional odd volumes of Searching The Scriptures for 1970 leftover from bundles I purchased. I will send a set toanyone who does not have the 1970 papers and willwrite for them. First come, first served. L. A. Mott,Jr., Box 155, Romulus, Mich. 48174.
L. L. Applegate, P.O. Box 263, Vernon, Fla. 32462
— I moved back to Vernon, Fla., from Umatilla,Fla. last Jan. 11 to continue work with the church there. We now have 12 members and would appreciate help from our faithful brethren toward a "modest" meeting house. We own our property and an old boarding house which has been made usablefor meeting. It does not help much in getting peopleof the community to come. We need about $1500. toprovide an adequate place in which to meet. I believe there are faithful brethren who will help mein this endeavor. I am 79 years of age but intend tocontinue in His service.
Nathan E. Hagood, Hermitage, Tenn. — I amvery much interested in preaching the gospel on a full time basis. I have been preaching at differentcongregations as I have had opportunity. My wifeand I are members at Perry Heights church in Donelson, Tenn. Harry Ozment is the minister here. Ifthere be any questions as to my stand for the truthyou can feel free to contact any of the following:Harry Ozment, Donelson Pike, Donelson, Tenn.;
Jimmy Thomas, 2047 High School Road, Hueytown,Ala.; Robert Jackson, Riverside Drive church, Nashville, Term. I will be available for work in any section of the country at any time. Any-one wishing totalk with me can write me at this address: 219-A Bonnalynn Drive, Hermitage, Tenn., or call me at 1615-889-4373 collect.
NEW WORK IN MILLINGTON, TENN.
A much-needed work has been begun here in theMillington, Tenn., area. The congregation is locatednear a naval air station, and the fields are white toharvest with young military men and women, manyof whom are eager to hear the truth. The membershere are working in an organized personal work program, showing Bible filmstrips which have resulted in five baptisms since the first of the year.
We have a fine, enthusiastic young man laboring with this work, brother Dan King, whose excellent preaching has resulted in four restorations since the work started.
We began meeting Jan. 10, 1971, in the home ofone of the members with 20 present at our first meeting. This last Lord's Day we had 37 attending and now have a building with adequate facilities for seating 80 people at 6079 Highway 51 North, Millington, Tenn.
If anyone knows of any military personnel being transferred to the Millington Naval Air Station,please inform them of this new work.
We ask for the prayers of our brothers and sistersin Christ that the congregation here will continue togrow as we work to convert more and more lost souls to Christ through the gospel.
If any further information is needed, please call
(901) 876-5484, or write: church of Christ, 6079 Highway 51 North, Millington, Tenn.
PREACHER NEEDED IN MILBRIDGE, MAINE
W. C. Sandefur, Box 186, Milbridge, Maine 04658
— I will be moving to Douglas, Ind., July 1, 1971 tobegin work there with the congregation. The brethren in Milbridge need and desire a preacher to workwith them. They are able to supply $200.00 monthly toward his support. The attendance averages in thelow 80's on Sundays. This is a "hard" area for the work of an evangelist, but it needs a man who iswilling to work under the most trying circumstances.Denominations have "run free" in this area for yearswithout being "buffeted" with the truth. Anyone desiring to come here and work may contact me at the above address or Owen Beal, Kansas Road, Mil-bridge, Maine 04658.
"THE BRIDE AND THE BRIDEGROOM"
One of the arguments used by Baptist people tosustain their idea of a church during the personalministry of Christ is John 3:29. Christ said, "He that hath the bride is the bridegroom, but the friendof the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth himrejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice; this, my joy, therefore is fulfilled." Baptists havealways contended that Christ had a bride during hispersonal ministry. They teach that the bride is thechurch, therefore, the church was established during the personal ministry of Christ.
Most Baptists, when asked, will tell you that theBaptist church is the bride of Christ. This puts themin a precarious position. If they say he has morethan one bride, they accuse him of polygamy. If theyhold to the contention that he has only one brideand it is the Baptist church, then no one is marriedto the Lord but Baptists. The conclusion is inevitablethat no one is married to the Lord but Baptists and therefore they are the only ones who will go toheaven. Baptist people should be the last on earth to preach everyone to hell but their own members.
Then, if the Lord was married to the church during his personal ministry where did the ceremonytake place? It might be well to also give Rom. 7:2.Paul said, "And if the husband be dead, she is loose from the law of her husband." If Baptists be righton this question, did the Lord leave the church a widow when he died? The assumption is made byBaptists that this verse says that the Lord had abride during his personal ministry. The verse doesnot teach what they claim. It is true that the Lordtalks about both the church and a bride during hispersonal ministry but he didn't claim to have either.
Another scripture used by Baptists is I Cor. 12:28.Paul said. "And God hath set some in the Church;first, apostles; secondarily, prophets; thirdly, teachers ; after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps,governments, diversities of tongues." They connectthis with Mark 3:13-14, which reads as follows:"And he goeth up into a mountain and calleth unto him whom he would, and they came unto him; and he ordained twelve that they should be with him,and that he might send them forth to preach."
Baptists have always insisted that the word "ordain" means to "set in" and that because Paul said in the text above that God had "Set some in the church, first apostles," that the apostles were set inthe church on the mountain of ordination. While it is true that the word "ordain" means to set in, wemust find out into what they were set. As one studies the text he will find that they went up into the mountain as disciples of the Lord but when they left theywere apostles. The conclusion is inevitable that theywere set into their apostolic office and not the church.You will notice that after this he gave them thelimited commission and told them to go preach theKingdom was at hand. The text of I Cor. 12, refersto rank and not order.
IN CHRIST #2
In our last article we talked about what it means to be "in Christ." We were made aware of the fact that "Justification" abounds for the Christian because of Christ's death, burial, and resurrection. Wewere justified by the blood of Christ.
SANCTIFICATION ALSO "IN CHRIST"
Those who are "in Christ" are also sanctified. The word "sanctify" comes from the Greek word hagiazo,and means "to set apart." Because of our obedienceto the teaching- of Christ's Spirit, we are sanctifiedin Him. "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God ? Be not deceived: neitherfornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind northieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers,nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.And such were some of you: but ye are washed, butye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name ofour Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God" (I Cor. 6:9-11). Because we are sanctified "in Christ," the following privileges and duties are set forth.
A NEW KNOWLEDGE OF GOD
The apostles were given a new knowledge of God by the Holy Spirit. Paul said, "But as it is written eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which Godhath prepared for them that love him. But, Godhath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for theSpirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things ofGod" (I Cor. 2:9-10). Paul is not talking about whatis to come, but that which Peter said "the angelsdesired to look into" (I Pet. 1:12), that is, the Gospel of Christ. Both the prophets and angels desiredto look into the "scheme of redemption," but neitherone was given permission, The gospel came to those who were "sanctified in Christ."
GOD IS GLORIFIED
God is glorified through Christ who set himself
apart for the work God had assigned to him in becoming our savior. And, "He became the author ofeternal salvation to all them that obey him" (Heb.5:9). Now, Christ is glorified through us as we set ourselves apart from the world to do the work hehas commanded us to do. Hence, we are not to "gloryin men. Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or theworld, or life, or death, or things present, or thingsto come; all are yours; and ye are Christ's; andChrist is God's" (I Cor. 3:21-23). So, whatever manmay be able to do for the Lord, it is not because ofhis works of deserving, but because he has set himself apart to do the Lord's work and is "changedinto the same image from glory to glory, as by the Spirit of the Lord" (II Cor. 3:18).
NOW HAVE OBLIGATIONS AS STEWARDS
A "steward" is one who sees after the possessionsof another. He is made chargeable to the owner ormaster. When the Apostles were teaching the Wordof God, they were chargeable to the Lord. Paul said,"Let a man so account of us, as of the ministers ofChrist, and stewards of the mysteries of God. Moreover, it is required in stewards, that a man be foundfaithful" (I Cor. 4:1-2). We are charged, as was Timothy, to study and rightly divide the word ofGod (II Tim. 2:15). And, then when we read and study these things (knowing they are the commandments of the Lord, I Cor. 14:37) we are told,"And the things that thou has heard of me amongmany witnesses, the same commit thou to faithfulmen, who shall be able to teach others also" (II Tim.2:2). It is not enough, then, to be taught the wordof truth. If Timothy had received it but had nottaught it, would he have been a faithful steward ofGod ? Do you consider yourself a faithful Christian ?If so, how can you be the kind of steward God wantsyou to be unless you carry out your part of the command and "teach others also ?" Those who are "sanctified in Christ" have this obligation.
I AM NOW A SERVANT (SLAVE)
The word "servant" that is used to describe the Justified, Sanctified, Christian is a word that carrieswith it the idea of a slave. Paul said, "... and ye arenot your own. For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body and in your spirit,which are God's" (I Cor. 6:19-20). Paul recognized this fact and thus he made the observation regarding his own life, "But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means,when I have preached to others, I myself should bea castaway" (I Cor. 9:27). We know who our masteris, and we must know his will to know what we mustdo to please Him.
CONCLUSION
What we could not do before outside of Christ,now becomes both natural and possible in Him. Wenow seek to be what he wants us to be. He wants us to "let our light so shine before men that they maysee our good works and glorify the Father which isin heaven" (Matt. 5:16). These are just some of theprivileges and duties a person has who has beenjustified by the blood of Christ and sanctified by the Spirit of God.
