It is common among men to engrave epitaphs upontombstones of deceased loved ones. Usually the epitaph begins with "here lies." Quite different fromthat of men, Jesus' epitaph was spoken by the angelof God who said, "He is not here; for he is "risen" (Matt. 28: 6).

The Resurrection of Christ is the very crux ofChristianity. There would have been no Christianityhad the Resurrection not been founded and systematized. It is the miracle of miracles upon which thimportance of all other miracles of Jesus depend. Is it any wonder then that it is so often the target of sceptics and atheists? Many theories have been advanced to explain away the factuality of Christ's Resurrection.

ATHEISTIC THEORIES The women went to the wrong grave. It is unthinkable that those so dear to Christ who witnessed His burial (Luke 23:55) could in less than 72 hours forget the place of burial. Even if that was po ible there were far too many eye-witnesses to the empty tomb. Certain women found it empt(Luke 24:3); Peter and John found it empty (John 20:4-10); the Angels testified it was empty (Luke 24:5-7); the guards reported it empty (Matt. 28:11); and the Sanhedrin testified to its emptiness byinventing a libellous theory to explain why it was empty (Matt. 28:11-15). No, the women did not goto the wrong tomb. Jesus lived upon the earth, diedand was buried in a new tomb. The following Sundaythe tomb was empty. Something happened to thbody. What?The disciples stole the body. Oddly enough, thefirst theory advanced by anti-christs to answer theproblem of the mi ing body of Jesus is found in the Bible itself. "Say ye His disciples came by night and stole the body" (Matt. 28:11-15). How could such a lie po ibly be believed by anyone? If the guards who became "as dead men" (v. 4) were asleep, athey themselves falsely testified, then it follows that they were the least qualified to explain the mi ingbody. Yet, "the saying was spread abroad among the

We are grateful to so many for their response to our suggestion that the readers of SearchingThe Scriptures send in four subscriptions with their own. Many more than we expected did just that during the month of Januar y. We hopemany more will do the same. This is a way you can help us teach the truth to others. Four subscriptions (or renewals) with your own subscription advanced for one year for only $10.00.This is not much, but it will do so much goothrough the year. Why not do this today ? Send us a club of five subscriptions for only $10.00.

* * *

We wish to express our sincere thanks andappreciation for a number of good men anwomen who have, some of them, from the veryfirst sent Searching The Scriptures to several for a year or more. Some of them sent 36 subscriptions for $5.00 per month; some sent 75subscriptions for $10.00 per month; and a fewsent 120 subscriptions for $15.00 per month.Several have ordered bundles sent to them to be distributed as they desired. The bundle rate is the same as above. Our sincere thanks to these men and women for their help in the circulation of Searching The Scriptures.

Jews, and continueth until this day" (v. 15). Whatever one chooses to say about Christ's disciples, they were not liars. They were all reputable men with the exception of Judas. Joseph of Arimathaea, in whose new tomb Jesus was bur ied, was "of honorable estate" (Mark 15:43), "a good and righteous man"(Luke 23:50). If the disciples of Jesus took the bodyby planned deception, they did not know what use to make of it until fifty days later. The disciples did not steal the body of Jesus.

The Swoon theory. This is the only theory advanced which does not admit the Lord actually diedSome have dared to claim that Jesus did not die at all but only swooned away, was buried but later left the tomb of his own strength. Even David Strauss,who did not believe in the Resurrection, repudiated

Page 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________

such a fanciful idea in his book, The Life of Jesus For The People. Strauss said, "It is impo ible that one who had just come forth from the grave haldead, who crept about weak and ill, who stood in need of medical treatment, of bandaging, strengthening, and tender care, and who at last succumbed to suffering, could ever have given to the disciples that impression that He was a conqueror over death and the grave — that He was the Prince of Life — which lay at the bottom of their future ministry." If Jesus did not die while upon the cro , then whendid He die ? If He was only in a swoon and managed somehow to roll away the heavy stone in His weak and wounded condition, why did not His disciples show pity, sympathy and administer first aid? Instead they rejoiced and boldly preached the Resurrection with enthusiasm. Jesus simply was not bur ied while in a swoon. He died. His side was pierced while He was still on the cross and "straightway there came out blood and water" (John 19:34).It is suggested that the water must have come from the water filled pericardium membrane which surrounds the heart thus making death certain.

The enemies of Jesus stole the body. Such would have defeated the very purpose of placing guards before the tomb. The enemies of Jesus were tryingto prevent an opportunity for the disciples to claim Jesus had risen, not provide them with one. Surely,if the enemies had taken the body, they would havproduced it on Pentecost when three thousand were baptized upon their faith that Jesus had risen from the dead. The enemies did not take the body of Jesus.

WITNESSES OF JESUS' POST-RESURRECTION APPEARANCES

Jesus' appearances after His resurrection fromthe grave furnish overwhelmingly abundant evidence of Christ's Resurrection from the dead. Jesus was seen by certain women who found the empttomb (Matt. 28:1-10) ; Mary Magdalene at the sepulchre (John 20:1-8) ; the Apostle Peter (I Cor. 15:5) ;two disciples on the way to Emmaus (Mark 16:1213); ten apostles and other disciples (Mark 16:1418) ; several disciples by the Sea of Galilee (John 21:1-23) ; the apostles and 500 brethren (Matt. 28:16-20; I Cor. 15:6) ; James (I Cor. 15:7) ; apostles at Jerusalem (Luke 24:50-52). In no other realm thanreligion could intelligent men and women reject thereliability of such evidence. Christ's appearances were of great variety. They occurred at different times, different places, to different people who heard Him say different words and saw Him do different things. This evidence constituted facts seen with the eye, touched with the hand and heard with the ears (I John 1:1).

CONCLUSION

All the atheists, sceptics and modernists throughout the history of man on earth will never silence the proclamation of the fact of the Resurrection ofthe Lord Jesus Christ from the dead. The N.T. church of Christ exists today and will continue texist because of this fact. Truly the Resurrection is the cornerstone of Christianity. By it Christ is declared to be the Son of God with power (Rom. 1:4). As the "first fruits of them that sleep" (I Cor. 15: 20) he offers to all obedient believers assurance of victory over death. Well did the Apostle say, "because if thou shalt confess with thy mouth Jesus as Lord, and shalt believe in thy heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved" (Rom. 10: 9). The epitaph of Jesus is simple, yet is of great magnitude. "Why seek ye the living among thdead? He is not here, but is risen." To those faithless seekers of pleasure only in this life we wouldsimply ask the converse of this — Why seek ye the dead among the living ?

__________________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 3

The monthly publication you are now reading idevoted to a sincere and unbiased desire to search the inspired word of God in an effort to separate truth from error. Our Lord said, "And ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free" (John 8:32). Our souls are purified in obeying the truth (I Peter 1:22). The Holy Spirit said, "Beloved, believe not ever y spir it, but try the spir its whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world" (I John 4:1). Verse 6 of the same chapter says, "We are of God: he thatknoweth God heareth us (apostles) ; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit oftruth, and the spirit of error." We are to test the preachers and teachers whether they are teachingthe truth, and the only standard is the word of God

— what the apostles taught as they were guided bythe Holy Spirit.

No man or group of men are allowed to decidewhat truth is. No editor, paper, school, church, board of directors or eldership may determine what is truth and what is not truth. Only the inspired word of God can do that. Each individual must study fohimself to learn, believe and obey the truth as it is taught in God's word to be made free from sin.

Searching The Scriptures was born January, 1960.We began with the honest desire to study the word of God by the printed page with all who would read and study with us. We belong to no group of men.We are not for sale to any man for any price, because we realize that our souls, as well as the souls of others, are at stake. What is more important than the destiny of the souls of men for whom Christ died?

The men who write regular sections in this journal were asked because we believe they are honest, sincere students of the Bible who will write their articles in an effort to exalt the word of the Lord above all human wisdom, and do so in love for truth and the souls of men. We believe also that they will write without fear or favor toward any man or group ofmen. Each man is free to write without editorial censorship, and we intend to keep it that way!

In the first i ue of Searching The Scriptures we set forth the only policy we intended to follow: "Wehave no policy but to be scriptural, fair, sincere, andfaithful in our work as editors of this paper." This is still our objective. However, we are not bound tobe in agreement in all respects with any one whowrites in this paper. In that same editorial we said: "We do not become obligated to personally endorse everything that may appear in this publication. Each writer will be responsible for his own writing."

We intend to continue to publish "both sides" of any controversy, but this always presents some problems for the editor. How long should a given subjectbe discussed ? Whose articles shall be published when we have several on hand on the subject? How can webe fair to all concerned? These are but a few of the matters to be decided in controversial subjects. Wehave, however, adopted a guide line by which some of these questions can be decided. We will not publish any sarcastic attack on the personal character of anyone. This does not mean that a man's falseteaching will not be exposed in plain words and the false teacher identified. We will not publish long,rambling and verbose articles that confuse rather than teach. We will not publish unsupported chargesagainst anyone. If you want to expose the teaching or practice of someone whose influence upon brethren may be dangerous, by all means write it. But be sure to provide us along with the article the proof of thevidence. Last, and most important, we will not publish anything that is not designed to expose error and immorality and teach God's truth to the end that all readers will be edified. We seek to edify all who read this journal. We may not always accomplish that, but we sincerely seek to do so.

We are not afraid of controversy and will meet error wherever we find it. In the fear of God we intend to be no respecter of persons in this matter. We do not intend to compromise truth for any price. We want to do all the good we can and no harm at all.May God help us to be faithful to His word, opeminded to receive divine truth, unashamed and unafraid to boldly speak His word, and give Him gloryfor all good done to the very end. So be it

H. E. PhillipsJames P. Miller

GAL 6:10-INDEPENDENT OR COLLECTIVE FUNCTION?

L. A. Mott, Jr., Wayne, Mich.

Please consider the following contribution toward the effort to answer the above question.

The subject under discu ion, in metaphorical language, is sowing and reaping. This is clear in verses 7 and 8. But it should be noted that the same metaphor is used in verses 9 and 10, and the subject is the same. The latter verses only translate the metaphor into literal terms. Consider verse 9: "in due season we shall reap." Now consider verse 10: "as we have opportunity, let us work that which is good,"etc. "Opportunity" is translated from the same Greek word as is rendered "season" in verse 9, andthe thought is that as there will be a reaping season, so there is now a sowing season. The "well-doing" of verse 9 and the working good of verse 10 is the literal language which defines the sowing. The reapingis the reception of eternal life (verse 8)

We can now settle the i ue suggested in our title by asking a question: Is the reaping to be done on an independent or a collective basis? Are we to be judged in groups or as independent entities? No one will miss the point here. We all know the judgmentwill be "single file." Consider verse 5: "For each man shall bear his own burden."

That settles the question. The sowing is done onthe same basis as the reaping. Therefore, the sowing — "well-doing" and working that which is good —is something to be done by disciples of Christ on anindependent basis, according to this context. Other passages will discuss their collective functions. This one does not.

Page 4 _________________________________________________________________________________________________

BOGARD'S BAPTIST WAY BOOK-NO. 2

This is the second in a series on Mr. Bogard's Baptist Way Book, published back in 1945. Mr. Bogard,the champion among Baptist preachers of his day, teaches a great deal of truth in his book. However,once in a while he slips in some Baptist doctrine, incompatible with the word of God. On page 18 whilewriting on "The way of church policy" he says, "The conclusion is clear. It was to 'the church' that the Commission was given. It is therefore the duty othe congregation to do all that the commi ion enjoins. The congregation is the unit in all the work contemplated in the commi ion. There is not theslightest hint in the New Testament of there being authority on earth above a congregation of baptizedisciples. Where we read of 'elders that rule well,the literal rendering is the 'elders that lead well.'The 'elder' or bishop, which are the scriptural terms for the pastor, is a leader of his flock over which the Holy Spirit has made him overseer. But he leads byteaching, by example, and not by authority. To exercise authority is expressly forbidden by our Master. Matt. 20:25-26: 'Ye know that the princes of theGentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you.' In I Peter 5:3: 'Neither as being lords (masters) over God's heritage, but beingexamples to the flock.' "

Mr. Bogard says the commission was given to thechurch. This isn't quite correct. It was given to menwho later became members of the church. However,we have other scriptures which teach that thechurch did send forth the gospel by sending outpreachers. Paul said, "I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service" (II Cor. 11:8).This shows that churches supported Paul while hepreached the gospel at Corinth. There was direct contact between Paul (the preacher), and the supporting churches.

Mr. Bogard made a scriptural blunder when hequoted scripture about the elders of the church andthen applied it to a local preacher. Notice his shiftfrom the plural to the singular! He gave us scripture about the elders (plural) who rule well. Then he says, "The 'elder' or bishop, which are the Scripturaterms for pastor, is a leader of his flock — ." Notice the shift to the singular. Mr. Bogard, and his peoplefeel that the preacher is the "pastor" of the flock. They feel that terms like "bishops," "pastors," etc., refer to the local preacher. The truth of the matter is that one cannot read of "the elder of a church" or "the pastor of a church" but rather a plurality ofsuch men. It is true that sometime an elder will preach for a flock. However, even then, he is not "the pastor" but rather a pastor just like the other pastors of the flock. It is much like, "John the Baptist." Nowhere in the Bible does one read of "a Baptist."John was called "the Baptist" because he baptized people. A Baptist preacher once told me that "John was a Baptist and when he baptized Jesus that made him a Baptist." I then asked, "If a doctor doctors a patient will that patient become a doctor because he was doctored by a doctor?" That ended the conversation.

Mr. Bogard tells us that to use authority is expressly forbidden by the Master. I must agree that the type of authority used by the "Princes of the Gentiles" is forbidden by the Scriptures. However,Paul told Titus to "rebuke with all authority" (Titus 2:15). This shows that all authority is not expresslyforbidden. The word "authority" like many .words has different meanings Paul wanted Titus and allother preachers to use the Word of God with fullAuthority. As long as a man stays within the confines of God's word he may speak with authority.

A TYPICAL LETTER FROM A ROMAN CATHOLIC

We sometimes wonder just what our nation would be like if we had no freedom of worship as our Constitution GUARANTEES us. If Pope Leo XIII had his way, and his followers were in the majority, thenthe following principle would be enforced:

"...IT IS QUITE UNLAWFUL TO DEMAND, TO DEFEND, OR TO GRANT UNCONDITIONAL FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, OF SPEECH, OF WRITING, OR OF WORSHIP, AS IF THESE WERE SO MANY RIGHTS GIVEN BY NATURE TO MAN..." (Taken from Leo XII's Encyclical on Human Liberty.) The above quotation substantiates exactly and completelythe charge that the Roman Church is just as dangerous and detrimental to our nation's freedoms as is the Communist movement. T he above statement calls for (1) THOUGHT CONTROL, (2)ORAL CENSORSHIP, (3) WRITTEN CENSORSHIP and (4) SPIRITUAL REGIMENTATION!

The writer of an approved Catholic Dictionary

stated: "THE INALIENABLE RIGHT OF ALL

MEN TO WORSHIP GOD ACCORDING TO

THE TEACHING OF THE CATHOLIC

CHURCH." (Definition of Catholic 'freedom of

Worship')

That's quite similar to a Ru ian election in asatellite country . . . free balloting, the right to vote. . . but only one candidate's name on the ticket.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________Page 5

LETTER FROM A STRANGER

Today, we received a letter from a gentleman whohas read some of our articles on the subject of Roman Catholicism. We have never met him, but his letter was of a far higher type than many we havereceived from Roman Catholics. However, even thismore refined epistle was quite descriptive. We copybelow, some of the phrases used in describing the religious paper in which our articles appear: (1) ".. . conglomeration of falsehood ..." (2)" ... slanderous material.. . malicious purvey-ors of prevarication."

(3) "... journalistic trash based on ignorance or prejudice . . ." (4) "... put the hate sheet where it belongs —in the garbage can!"

T hose ar e some samples of expr essions contained in an average "refined" letter on the subject. Of course, those that come to my desk that are less refined, I would not or could not quote for publication.

A RAT-POISON EPISODE

Some of my associates have known of this occurrence, but several years ago, while presenting dailygospel broadcasts on the local radio station, an enthusiastic Catholic listener sent me a note along with a brand new package of rat-poison. The note asked that I take the poison; "take all of it, for we won'tmiss you one little bit." Well, I didn't even take thenote very seriously ... let along take the poison. Butit still points up the thought. .. what would our nation be like IF we did not enjoy the right, privilege and freedom to worship as we each conceive to be right?

We have been asked: "Did you turn over the rat poison and note to the Postal Authorities or the

F.B.I. ?" Our reasoning has always been that the person who actually signs their name to a letter or package will do you no harm, while the one so cowar dly as to be afr aid to sign his name, would beafraid to do any harm . . . therefore, no report was ever made to the authorities.

However, the problems and privations that gospel pr eacher s face today in the United States ar e nothing compared to those found in Catholic dominatedlands. And, the problems of preaching the truth inCatholic dominated nations is slight compared to the dangers and tortures faced by the Apostles andteacher s of New T estament days.

Those of us who teach the truth simply need topress the truth home all the more. We need to do as Jude wrote . . . "CONTEND EARNESTLY FOR THE FAITH ONCE FOR ALL DELIVERED TO THE SAINTS..." (Jude 3).

(A few days ago a friend asked me why I didnot publish adverse and critical comments in thissection. Some time ago I stated why we did notdo this. People usually do not object to favorablecomments being printed, but they do not wantcritical comments published. This is shown bythe fact that they usually write without signingtheir names to the letters. The ratio of critical comments to favorable comments is about 1 to

100. If you want to say anything about thispaper or the editors, say it! We will publish it ifyou tell us to do so. The only requirement wemake is that the comments be about the averagelength of those appearing in this section, andthat you sign your name to the letter. We will notpublish anonymous comments. — Editors).

"Let me encourage you that you may ever teach in this paper only that which you can find authority for in the New Testament." — Grady Bailey, Erwin, Tenn.

"We want you to know how much we enjoy your fine paper. We have been receiving it about three years now." — Mrs. Woodrow Newton, Jasper, Tenn.

"One of the best papers published." — Charles E. Beaty, Houston, T exas.

"We have only been taking your paper for a short time and really enjoy it. Keep up the good work." —Howar d Mathieson, Finksbur g, Md.

"Just a note to send our new addr ess and say wer eally enjoy r eading the paper. Keep up the goodwork." — Wayne Sullivan, Pretoria, South Africa.

"We enjoy Searching The Scriptures very much."

— Mr. & Mrs. W. B. Stinson, Columbia, Tenn. "You have done an excellent job in editing andwriting for Searching The Scriptures, and I hopethat your health will permit you to continue in this effort in the future." — Earl Fly, Jackson, Tenn."I enjoy Searching The Scriptures so much that I do not want to miss a single copy." — Mrs. Rose E. Jonas, Palmetto, Fla."Several friends who read my copy each monthenjoy your paper as much as I." — Lillie Love, Tr enton, Fla."First of all I would like to say that I enjoy reading your paper..." — James P. Alexander, Hermitage, T enn."We do not subscribe to your paper, but we havereceived many copies and have enjoyed it with your teaching and the soundness of God's word." — Marcus & Estelle Pardue, Birmingham, Ala. (A friend sent it to you — Editor.)"I continue to enjoy Searching The Scriptures. It is a good paper. You are teaching the truth and that is the thing we all need." — James A. Walker, Mc-Minnville, T enn."I still enjoy your paper and do not want to do without it." — Ida Holt, L ynn, Ar k."Keep up the good work as it is much needed." —Mattie Baker, Baileyton, Ala."Ruth and I enjoy your paper so much that I hope

to place them in the library for my grandson, Stanley L uke Caldwell, as each bound addition come

Page 6 __________________________________________________________________________________________________

out." — Mrs. C. G. Caldwell, Sr., Manchester, Tenn.

"I want to commend you and brother Miller for the good work you are doing, and I trust the good Lord will give you many more years to teach His Word."

— W. L. Foshee, Bowling Green, Ky

"You are doing a fine work in publishing Searching The Scriptures. May God give you both long lives in His service." — Mrs. Opal L. Smith, Tampa, Fla

"I can't tell you how much I appreciate the factthat we still have brethren who will contend for the faith. I appreciate the work you are doing. After myfamily and I left the liberal church, my people turned against us. Believe me Searching The Scriptures has been a great help in supplying ready answers for those who oppose us." — James R. Burroughs, Inkster, Mich.

"Searching The Scriptures is an excellent paper. May God bless you in the wonderful work you ardoing." — Wallace Whitehorn, Athens, Ala

"We enjoy the paper very much, and look forward to reading it each month." — Albert Dabbs, Humphrey, Ark.

"I certainly enjoy Searching The Scriptures . . .Keep up a very good and a much needed work." —Hagan Albritton, Bradenton, Fla

"I want to continue enjoying Searching The Scriptures, so please renew my subscription." — Mr. & Mrs. William Dossett, Oakland City, Ind.

THE PEOPLE'S NEW TESTAMENT WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES

B. W. Johnson

This new one-volume edition is the pr oduct of many year s of dedicated study, research and in -sight. It contains the entire New Testament in both the King James and Revised Versions, inparallel columns for ready reference and comparison. A verse -by -verse study on the same page with the text. A ver y popular commentar y.

Single volume of entire

N.T $5.00

CAMPBELL AND LOVELL —

SAME VIEWS BUT DIVIDED

Bro. Lovell made another statement we wish to consider at this point which is identical to the reasoning of Alexander Campbell and which led to thformation of the Mi ionary Society that DIVIDED THE CHURCH scarcely one hundred years ago. Notice what Lovell said:

"... there is no local church that can alone fulfill all of the commandments for the univer-sal church, yet. . . every church has the whole world obligation and responsibility." Notice how this compares with Campbell's arguments shown in the following quotation:

"Throughout the land he (Campbell) believed

there were a thousand or more local congrega

tions vehemently crying for some means of co

operating their efforts. Many people appeared to

believe that if they had such an organization as

would unite their combined efforts, they would

carry everything before them. Campbell. . . also

believed that some sort of organization was nec

essary to prevent the restoration movement

from going into retrograde.

"His reasoning was 'that the church in the aggregate has the responsibility of converting theworld.'" (THE SEARCH FOR THE AN-CIENT ORDER, West, I. Vol. 1 ppg. 168-169) As in thedays of Campbell they thought "if the) had such an organization as would unite their combined efforts,they would carry everything before them" so bro.Lovell said, "we are especially interested in helpinthe gospel to be preached in all the world." Now this is fine and one who would disagree with this poinwould not be much of a Christian. But then he said that "every church has the whole world obligation . . ." and "Once our knowledge covers this fact we will be ready to take our place a the universal church for a universal cause." Thus he shifts from "every church" with regard to the "obligation" of "helping the gospel to be preached," to "our place as the universal church for a universal cause." To strengthen his cause for the "universe church" he argues that "great men of the GospelAdvocate have been telling the world that we are the people who speak as the oracles of God." An"For more than a half century up here at David Lipscomb College and in every pulpit today of everychurch of Christ in Nashville (what about the rest of the country? LR) we declare to all that we speakwhere the Bible speaks and are silent where it is silent. . ." Again, "if there is a city on earth which might be called the Jerusalem of this age, it wouldin my opinion be Nashville."

Since "great men of the Gospel Advocate had been telling the world ..." (I suppose they are doingtheir bit for the "universal cause" of the "universe

_______________________________________________________________________________________________ Page 7

church") and "up here at David Lipscomb College

we declare we speak where the Bible speaks ..."

and Nashville is our modern "Jerusalem" we find the

same attitude that not only led to the formation of

the Missionary Society because "the church in the

aggregate has the responsibility of converting the

world," but the very same attitude and principle that

gave rise to the Papacy of which we spoke earlier. At

least Campbell was more consistent: he argued for

the church universal with regard to "converting the

world." Bro. Lovell has, not only the church univer

sal, but throws in the Gospel Advocate "telling the

world," and "David Lipscomb College . . . declare we

speak where the Bible speaks . . ." and all this is our

modern "Jerusalem." Next we might hear that

Goodpasture, Collins, Pullias, Baxter, North, etc., are

the "apostles" in our modern "Jerusalem."

Now if Campbell was WRONG in seeking to acti

vate the church universal then by what reasoning is

Lovell RIGHT in seeking the same? If Campbell's

argument was instrumental in the formation of an

ecclesiastical body which is contrary to scriptural or

ganization and government of the church, then b

what token is Lovell right in his reasoning which is

contrary to scriptural organization and government

of the church ?

If this practice promoted by Campbell was the CAUSE OF DIVISION then because it was unscriptural, and resulted in the formation of the denomination called the Christian Church, does bro. Lovell stand divided from those digressives while at thesame time he endorses the VERY SAME PRINCIPLE AND PRACTICE THAT CAUSED DIVISION? If bro. Lovell will admit this caused division THEN,why is he pressing the very same issue amonchurches of Christ TODAY to the point of division ? If Campbell and his followers were wrong in dividing the church then over those i ues, who is wrong, or guilty, for dividing the church today over theVERY SAME ISSUES WHICH BRO. LOVELL IS PRESSING TODAY? Or will bro. Lovell deny thereis any difference or division between him and those of the Christian Church ? Either he will have to renounce his present position which is the very samthat caused division in Campbell's days, and stand divided from the Christian Church, or he will have to admit the Christian Church is right in its position (which is the same as his) and "join" himself tothat body. Which will it be, bro. Lovell? Campbell reasoned that "the church in the aggregate has the responsibility of converting the world" and bro. Lovell speaks of "Action by a universal church for a universal cause" because "there is no local church that can alone fulfill all of the commandments for the universal church . . ."

The very error that Campbell made was that the"church in the aggregate" should function and beorganized. This is bro. Lovell's error when he speaks of "A Universal Church for a Universal Cause."

(Radio sermon delivered over radio station WDXE

in Lawrenceburg, Tenn. 9/18/66)

In last week's Wednesday edition of the NashvilleBanner, there was an article by Bob Bell Jr., thpopular church news editor of the Banner, dealingwith the concern of "laymen" for the church. This article contained some observations that I think are worthy of our consideration.

In the first place, let me say it is unfortunate that the distinction of "clergy" and "laity" or "laymen" has come to be manifested among believers in Christ. This distinction has become pronounced as men applied their wisdom and satisfied their pride in organizing believers and setting up ecclepiasticisms. The New Testament teaches that all disciples of Christ are one, and while some may serve in various capacities because of special talents, all are still just servants of the Lord and brothers and sisters in Him. No one person, or group of persons, has the authority to make laws, determine faith, or decide the practices of God's people. Jesus Christ is the head of His church, the King of His Kingdom, andall directions must come from Him, through the inspired Word (Eph. 1:20-23, Col. 1:18; I Pet. 4:11)

Mr. Bob Bell begins the article under consideration with the question: "Just what is the state of American churches today?" He then proceeds to reveal the feeling and concern of members in contrast with that of their leaders. From the standpointof "top leaders" in the churches, Mr. Bell says the almost unanimous cry is: "the church is in revolution and must change or die." A popular expression among some is "be on the march." He suggests that these leaders have been talking to themselves so much that they've convinced each other of what they're saying," but that members wish these leaders would quit trying to "whip up concern" for they are not buying the idea of "change just to be changing," or I might add, marching just to be marching

Anyone who has but casually glanced at today'sreligious world knows that changes are everywhere apparent. Officials in large denominations are changing long standing beliefs and practices, rewritingtheir creeds, and entering fields of activity that intimes past were never thought of as church functions. And, these changes are being made in concession to the desires of a changing, and loose society

While the church of Christ has no central headquarters or officials who hand down decrees and orders for saints or congregations, I must confess that there are some today among my own brethren who are affected with this spirit, and fancying themselves great leaders, they seek to lead brethren andchurches in changes that are completely foreign andcontrary to the doctrine of Christ.

In days past brethren were content to follow scriptural instruction whereby parents provided spiritual,physical, and academic training for their children (Eph. 6:4), but today churches are urged to a ume

Page 8___________________________________________________________________________________________________

this educational responsibility by building and maintaining colleges and universities for such. The Head of the church, Jesus Christ, instructs his disciples to visit the fatherless and widows in their afflictions (Jas. 1:27) and churches to relieve widows indeed (I Tim. 5:16, Acts 6:1-5), saints in need (Acts 2:4445, Rom. 15:25-28), even sending relief to saints in distant places, deliver ing the aid "to the elder s" where the need existed (Acts 11:29-30). But, today,churches are urged to subsidize institutions and incorporations that care for children, elderly peopleunwed mothers, etc. — sending to these institutions instead of sending to the elders of a church where need exists. Whereas the Bible teaches, and brethren acquiesced in days past, that the church is a spiritual body engaged in the work of saving and ministering to souls; today there are those who urge achange that would allow the church to provide social needs in the form of recreational and banquetinhalls, play grounds, and camps. Some are no longer content for each church to do its own evangelizingin a gospel meeting, or by press and radio, functioning as the independent body the New Testament teaches each church is, but must have "campaigns," and projects, involving a union of numerous churches. Even the old time chapter and verse —Bible filled — preaching has been changed to a softer more philosophical approach.

These, my friends, are just some of the changethat are so apparent in today's religious world, andeven among many of my own brethren.

Mr. Bell says, according to his own private survey, some people feel that "there are certain basic Christian principles that are just as up-to-date today as they were 2,000 years ago when they were first enunciated by Jesus Christ," and these are very concerned about this mad rush for "change.

It is suggested that the promoters of change today often "have harsh words for church members who won't change anything, classifying any criticism as being inspired by extremists," but Mr. Bellsuggests concerning this that "their fellow members who remember back to the days of wagons recall how, on a downgrade, a chained wheel that was completely immovable seemed the most useful purpose of preventing runaways and wrecks."

My friends, I make no apology for taking thchain of God's word and doing my best to lock some wheels in the church that have headed downgrade and running roughshod over Bible truth toward complete wreck or apostasy. Promoters may call mean "extremist," "radical," "anti," a chronic objector, or by any other uncomplimentary term, but beindetermined to "abide in the doctrine of Christ" and contend for "the faith," I assure you, the chain wilcontinually be applied to runaway theories and practices.

Mr. Bell, in his article lists five complaints — or things about which he says there is great concern on the part of those he descr ibes as "laymen." I would like to mention these five things, with a fewcomments.

1. "The trend toward personal power by peoplewho are supposed to be working for the church."

This objection, according to Mr. Bell is to certain officials who declare themselves spokesmen for their denomination. Mr. Bell's findings indicate that some people still do question the right or authority of men to make some of the changes they recommend. The majority of religious people today, particularly thdenominational world, are perfectly willing for appointed officials to tell them what to believe andpractice. Even in the Lord's church, it is not uncommon to find some relying upon their favorite preacher or religious magazines to tell them what is right or wrong. But, in spite of this popular attitude,the Bible still says that Chr ist is the head of thebody (Col. 1:18) and has "all authority" (Matt. 2818) and that man must not go beyond or change Hitruth (II John 9:10, Gal. 1:8-9), but "abide in the doctrine" — doing all things "in the name of — or by the authority of — the Lord Jesus Christ" (Col. 3:17). This teaching, when impressed upon hearts,will always be a chain on the wheel of authority usurped by men. Thank God for all those who still want to apply this chain!

2. Concern exists among members because they

are left out and are not "in the know," learning onlythe things about their church that their officials want them to know. Obviously, this is a condition in the denominational world where boards and officials have been set up. In the church of the New Testament no officials exist, other than Christ the head,and His will is in the revealed scriptures where all can see and know. He did ordain that there be elders in each local church (Acts 14:23, Tit. 1:5) to "oversee" or "tend" the flock (Acts 20:28, I Pet. 5:2), but arbitrary ruling on their part is strictly forbidde(I Pet. 5:3)

1. People are said to be concerned about the tendency of officials to automatically classify any criticism as being inspired by extremists. This is a tendency manifested in almost every realm, and bypeople of every age. People in New Testament times cla ified John the Baptizer an extremist because of one type of action and Jesus an extremist in theother direction (Matt. 11:18-19). When one, inflated with his own greatness, promotes some cherished things and there is objection, instead of giving prooffor his action, if he could, he just ridicules his objector, brands him with some uncomplimentary epithetand goes his merry way. This action is found in religious circles as well as in political and theological realms, and is rightly resented.
2. Mr. Bell points to "the steam-roller tactics of some to force all Protestants into a super-church,

which has many so-called "laymen" concerned. Hesays they regard it as a move for power. All of us are aware of the efforts and speeches having to do with ecumenical movements, all designed to form some kind of union of churches. Such is, of course, a reach for power. The Bible teaches unity, not union. If all people humbly submitted themselves to the reigning Christ, following only his teaching,there would be a oneness of mind, judgment, andaction (I Cor. 1:19, Eph. 4:1-5), and no ecclesiasticisms or combines with steam-roller tactics that ignore personal faith and conviction.

5. The rapid turnover of preachers is suggested as a concern of many church members today. This they attribute to the "ministry as a vocation" attitude which moves preachers about for financial and "position" considerations rather than engaging in a dedicated work of conviction. I believe that all will admit that this, too, is a just complaint. The commercializing and position jockeying of preachers is not only a disgrace but contrary to everything recorded inthe scriptures concerning evangelists and their work. My friends, it is refreshing to me to learn fromthis article by Mr. Bell that there is a wide-spread concern and objection on the part of religious people to power seeking religious leaders who seek tochange the age-old truths and practices of God's word to conform to a pleasure-seeking, proud, headstrong, rebellious generation. I try to preach a positive gospel, sowing the seed of God's word and cultivating that which results from this sowing, butwhen designing men who have embraced worldly wisdom and human philosophy try to move thechurch away from Bible truth to their man-made doctrines and practices, there is no course left forgospel preachers but to lock these runaway wheels with the chain of God's word. This, of course, stirs the "ire" of the promoters and causes them to goabout spouting epithets of "extremists," "legalists," "antis," etc., but it will save the church from apostasy and souls from spiritual wreck.

GOOD BOOKS FOR YOUR LIBRARY

Boswell-Hardeman Debate (Instrumental Music) 3.50 Porter-Tingley Debate (Direct operation of the Holy Spirit, Necessity of Baptism and Salvation by Faith Only) 3.50 T he Genesis Flood (Henry M. Morris & John C.

Whitcomb) 6.95 The Search For The Ancient Order, Vol. I & II , each 4.00 Alexander Campbell's T our In Scotland (Chalmers)

2.00

The Harding-Nichols Debate (Salvation & Baptism: The Subject, Action and Design) 2.50 The Campbell-Rice Debate on Baptism 6.00 Larimore And His Boys (Srygley) 3.50 Biography of J. T. Johnson (John Rogers) 3.50 Biography of N. B. Hardeman 3.75 New Commentary On Romans (Grubbs) 2.50 The Witness Of The Spirits (Zachary) 3.00 The Nashville Debate: Moody-Harding (Baptism

and Work of the Holy Spirit) 5.00 History Of Reformatory Movements (Rowe) 5.00 Biblical Criticism ( J. W. McGarvey) 3.50 The Kingdom Of Promise And Prophecy (R. L.

Whiteside) 2.50 The Christian Baptist (Campbell) Vols. 1 through 7, each

3.50

Communism, Its Faith and Fallacies (James D.

Bales) , 3.00 Churches of Today (L . G. Tomlinson) 2.50 Fox's Book of Martyrs 3.00 Mormonism Exposed (Hancock) 2.25

Order From-

PHILLIPS PUBLICATIONS P. O. Box 17244 Tampa, Florida 33612

The following debates are available on new 1 1/2 milMylar (polyester) tape, weather resistant recorded onboth sides at 3 1/4 i. p. s. These tapes can be played onany recorder using a 7" reel Each reel contains onefull night's discussion Recording at 1 7/8 ips can beobtained on 3" or 5" reels The price is $3.00 per reel — one reel for each night Any defective recording will bereplaced free of charge if the bad tape is returned

INMAN-WILLIS DEBATE

Parkersburg, W. Va.

Clifton Inman and Cecil Willis discuss the Herald of Truth and Orphan Homes September 19-23, 1966

Four reels — $12.00

INMAN-WILLIS DEBATE

Dayton, Ohio

Clifton Inman and Cecil Willis discuss the Herald of Truth and Orphan Homes October 31-November 4, 1966

Four reels — $12.00

LITTLE ROCK DEBATE

Little Rock, Arkansas Dr James D Bales and Dr Jack Wood Sears vs Dr Carl Sagan, Dr Ernan McMullin, Dr Thomas K. Shot -well and Dr R. C. Lewontin discuss Creation and Evolution Questions fr om the audience answer ed June 28, 29, 1966

Three reels — $9.00

GRIDER-McCAGHREN DEBATE

Longview, Texas A C Grider and H. C. McCaghren discuss churches

sending to another chur ch to pr each the gospel and churches supporting orphan homes November, 1966

Four reels — $12.00

MOSBY-TOTTY DEBATE

Frankfort, Kentucky

Ronald Mosby and W L Totty discuss church support of non members and orphan homes December 12-16, 1966

Four reels — $12.00

BOZARTH-MIZELL DEBATE

Chicago, Illinois

Elvis Bozarth and William Mizell discuss church support of those who are not Christians and orphan homes December 5-9, 1966

Four reels — $12.00

GARNER-HOGLAND DEBATE

Lakeland, Florida

Dr Albert Garner and Ward Hogland discuss instrumental music in worship Baptism for remission of sins, chur ch member ship, and apostasy

April 6 17, 1964 Special

— all 8 reels — $20.00

CROWE-SMITH DEBATE

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Glen Crowe and J. T. Smith discuss church kitchens and fellowship halls May 20, 21, 1966 Two reels — $6.00

Page 10 __________________________________________________________________________________________________

". . . THEY REHEARSED ALL THAT COD HAD DONE WITH THEM . . ."— Acts 14:27

COMER TO GO TO AUSTRALIA

Brother Harold V. Comer of Brownsburg, Indiana,has decided to go to Australia to preach the gospel.This is a big decision, and he made it only after much study and prayer. He and his wife believe that this is a field of labor where workers are greatly neededAnd Harold believes he can do good there.

We want to recommend Bro. Comer as a faithful gospel preacher who can be depended upon to do a very fine job of preaching the gospel in Australia. Bro. Comer is known and loved by us for his work's sake. He is a man of deep conviction and great faith. He is an inspiration to those who work with him. The work he has done at Brownsburg has been outstanding. Largely through his faithful life and teachingthe church has combined a rapid growth with asteadily advancing soundness of position. The liberals had a strong influence in the congregation when he moved there. Now the congregation has taken astrong, sound position.

Bro. Comer is, therefore, a man of proven ability.He is of a vigorous age (32) ; his wife and three children are in good health. We know of no one better qualified to do this work, and we unhesitatingly recommend him to the brotherhood. He plans to leave in April and is now seeking his support, work fund and travel fund. Contact him at: P. O. Box 184Brownsburg, Indiana. He will give a full report offunds received and expended.

Paul K. Williams, Plainfield, Indian

Ferrell Jenkins, Indianapolis, Indiana

Harold Tabor, Indianapolis, Indiana

William Lewis, Indianapolis, Indiana

Wm. E. Wallace, Indianapolis, Indian

Gary L. Ruddell, Indianapolis, Indian

Loren Raines, Indianapolis, Indiana

THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH IN NIGERIA

Wayne L. Payne, Poteau, Okla.

It is almost an oddity today to find a people searching for truth, and especially is this so when this quest is en masse. Yet it is happening. It is happening iNigeria, West Africa. Nigerians will gather in large crowds on the street corners and there stand for hours listening to the gospel being taught, and asking questions pertaining to their souls salvation. Accounts have been received of their even standingin the rain to listen to God's word. They are eager to receive tracts, the crowd surging forward to take them from the teachers' hands. They are eager tosign up for the Bible correspondence courses, anNigerians are being converted by the score. It is awonderful thing

T her e is one trouble in Niger ia though, ther e

aren't enough capable people to carry the gospel

throughout this land. They need and desire help in

the preaching of the gospel of Christ. And the Lord

willing my family and I will supply part of that help.

We (including my wife Lois and our three girls) have set our tentative date of departure for July othis year, but to make it a reality we need your help.We can't go without your help, and we are trustingthat you, our brethren, are interested enough in saving the lost to see that our needs are met.

We must raise approximately $550 a month forpersonal support, plus $100 a month for house rent and expenses. Yes, expenses are high in Nigeria,from two to three times what we enjoy in the UnitedStates. We will have to raise, in addition to oumonthly support, approximately $6,000 for travel and work funds since our return passage must beguaranteed before we can leave. Yes, this is a lot of money, but considering the results which have beenrealized of the work in Nigeria it is very little indeed. There is no better place in the world at this time where we could spend our" money and our energy.Will you help us to help the lost in Nigeria ? We praythat you will. Contact me at this address:

504 S. Front St.

Poteau, Okla. 74953

Phone 647-3546

IN APPRECIATION

I would like to express my sincere thanks andappreciation to all who have written me after reading the notice of the death of my wife, which appeared in a recent i ue of The Gospel Guardian. It is encouraging and comforting to hear from brethrenwhere I have preached in by-gone years, and whomI have not seen in many years. It is good to knowthat one's work is remembered and appreciated.

For over seven years I have lived and preached here in Concord, California. The church here hasfrom its very beginning stood firm for the truth of the gospel. This congregation is not ashamed or afraid to oppose the doctrines of men from withinand without.

Voyd N. Ballard P. O. Box

21316 Concord, California

94521

BOZARTH-FIKES DEBATE

PUBLIC DEBATE BETWEEN Elvis Bozarth,preacher at Grand Avenue church, 3679 W. Grand Ave., Chicago, Ill. 60651, and Windell R. Fikes, preacher at Elmhurst church, Elmhurst, Illinois MONDAY, MARCH 13, 1967, GRAND AVENUE BUILDING, 3679 W. Grand Ave., Chicago

"It is in harmony with the Scriptures for churches of Christ to contribute from their treasuries in support of the Herald of Truth radio program and other similar radio programs."

AFFIRMATIVE: Windell R. Fikes

NEGATIVE: Elvis Bozarth

TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 1967 — same location

"It is contrary to the Scriptures for churches of Christ to contribute funds from their treasuries in support of the Herald of Truth radio program another similar radio programs."

_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________Page 11

AFFIRMATIVE: Elvis Bozarth NEGATIVE: Windell R. Fikes THURSDAY, MARCH 16, 1967, Oakdale church building, 1054 W. Oakdale, Chicago

"It is in harmony with the Scriptures for churches of Chr ist to build, maintain, and supply orphahomes such as Boles Orphan Home."

AFFIRMATIVE: Windell R. Fikes

NEGATIVE: Elvis Bozarth

FRIDAY, MARCH 17, 1967, same location

"It is contrary to the Scriptures for churches of Christ to build, maintain, and supply orphan homes such as Boles Orphan Home."

AFFIRMATIVE: Elvis Bozarth

NEGATIVE: Windell R. Fikes

Time: 7:45 P. M. each date. Each speaker will have two thirty-minute alternate speeches on each proposition.

Wilmer Libby, Houlton, Maine — I have been preaching the gospel for about ten years, six of these at Danforth, Maine. I drove here to Houlton from Brewer, Maine, a distance of about 125 miles for six months before coming here May 1, 1966 to live andwork for the Lord. I have received partial supportand the remainder of my living I earned by working part time as janitor at the Aroostook General Hospital. This arrangement does not leave time enoughto do all the work that needs to be done here. The need is great and I need to devote all my time to preaching and teaching. To do this I need $250 to$300 more per month. I pay my own utilities andrent and have less than $200 promised for this year. There are nearly 10,000 people within this area and out of these we have averaged 12 for worship sinceMay 1. The church at Danforth will give me recommendation. Write to Earl Spooner, care of the church of Christ. My address is, Box 660, Houlton, Maine 04730.

Vaughn Green, Route 10, Gainesville, Ga. 30501

— The Enota church of Christ in Gainesville, Georgia is looking for a gospel preacher to labor full time with them. If anyone is interested, please contact me at the above address. My phone number is: 404 — 536-4095. C. W. Edwards, 323C Webber St., Sarasota, Fla33580 — The church of Christ in Osprey, Florida is looking for a gospel preacher to labor full time with us. My phone is: 924-0904, or contact Don Keele,Osprey, Florida, phone 966-2255.

Preacher available: Mature man (age 39) witelementary teaching certificate. Desires to locatewhere he can help struggling congregation unable to pay full support. I preach the "whole counsel of God." Must be able to locate teaching position intown where congregation is located. Write: Marshall Norman, P.O. Box 472, Excelsior Springs, Missouri 64024.

Charles F. House, San Luis, Ariz. — The church property at San Luis R. C. Sonora, Mexico becamenationalized, which means that now San Luis is recognized by the Federal and Local governments of Mexico as a church, with all rights, as providedunder their constitution. The work in Mexico is very slow and very difficult. A church building is very necessary as an aid to the native evangelists, since the Mexican people, due to their experience with the Roman Church, and until taught differently bymeans of the gospel, still consider the church building "holy," and the place where God, Christ, and theHoly Spirit dwell. To all the churches and all the individuals who have helped all of the evangelists, weexpress our deep appreciation. Three faithful evangelists are in need now. Can the church where youworship help directly to these men ? I will be glad tofurnish the details. Write me at P.O. Box 641, SaLuis, Arizona 85349.

WE WILL GO, SEND US!

To my brethren in Christ

The lord willing, and we live — Shirley, I and our three sons will be in Bergen, Norway, Sunday, June 11, 1967. We are looking and planning ahead in faith.Our youngest son David (who was born in Canada)is being naturalized so that we can receive passports. The necessary preparations are being made for the move. Our departure date from New York is set for June 9, 1967. The decision is definite We are studyingthe language as much as time will permit.

I consider it a pr ivilege and an opportunity tocarry out the command to "go into all the world" and look for it to be an experience that will enrich our faith. It also affords you another opportunity tofulfill the Lord's command to "teach all nations" having fellowship in the gospel with us.

Due to the nature of the move plans have to bemade well in advance. With our departure in theearly part of June our invitation to you is urgent. We are in need of our living expenses and travel fund. Will you have fellowship in the gospel with us ?

I have corresponded with brethren in Norway foabout five years, having been deeply interested in the Lord's work in Scandinavia; particularly Norway.Having intended to go now for some time, the timehas come I feel I must go! Brother Bob Tuten, whohas been there for four years, will be back in thStates by June 6, 1967. This will leave the Thorn-hills alone in Norway as the only American evangelist. We are placing ourselves in the hand of Godthat He may use us in this work if it be His will.

I cannot say what the fruits of our labor will be,or how successful our work. I can only a ure yothat I shall proclaim the true gospel of Jesus Christ and God will give the increase. I can promise yothat we shall do our very best!

Since the departure is set and time is short; if youplan to help in this work contact us now: Tom O.Bunting, 2410 S.W. 14 Street, Miami, Fla. 33145

Personal references: The editor of this paper. The faculty of Florida College. Harris Dark, Murfreesboro, Tenn., or Robert Jackson, Riverside Dr. church of Christ, Nashville, Tenn.

Faithfully,

Tom Bunting

Page 12 __________________________________________________________

THE COTTAGE MEETING TEACHER

New T estament Chr istianity has always beefaced with a tremendous problem. That problem is simply one of communication. Most of the world turns a deaf ear to the plea of God who calls upothem to repent (II Pet. 3:9). Those who love theLord continue to cry pathetically, "Lord, who hathbelieved our report" (Rom. 10:16)? Though Godstretches out His hand in mercy and grace, He does so to a disobedient and gainsaying people (Rom. 10: 21). God loved the world and gave His Son that thewor ld might through Him be r econciled to the Father (Jno. 3:16; II Cor. 5:18-19). Jesus knew that His mission was to be lifted up that He might draw all men unto himself (John 13:32). Having accomplished the will of God, Jesus ascended to the righthand of the throne of God. But He did not go to theFather until after He had given a commission topreach the gospel to all nations (Matt. 28:18-19).Since the gospel is the power to save (Rom. 1:16-17),God's people must deliver that message. Unless theydo so, they fail in their God-given duty. As Christians committed to loving obedience, we cannot butdo what our Lord wills with all diligence. One of theways of fulfilling this duty is through personal work. One facet of personal evangelism is the "cottagemeeting." I n this wr iting, the cottage meetinteacher is under discu ion.

AVERAGE TALENTS

D. L. Moody once said: "If the world is going tobe reached for Christ, I am confident it must be done by men and women of average talents." This applies to the role of personal work. One of the blunders made by Chr istians today is that of a uming that only the thoroughly prepared and highly trained personnel are effective as personal workers. Since the average person does not have time to acquire this skill, the fulfillment of this duty of teaching others is left to others. This results in one's excusing himself or herself, while at the same time feeling an obligation to teach. This creates a feeling of frustration. This is a serious mistake for it has been demonstrated many times that some of the most effective workers in this respect have come from men and women who were not skilled in the sense of proficiency. They were simply average Christians with reference to education and skill, who possessed a degree of tact and ability, and who were willing to "go, stand andspeak" (Acts 5:20)

In this age of specialization, brethren have allowed the defeatist attitude to engulf them. The task before us is that of arousing an awareness of the fact that one can teach and that with little preparation in the art of teaching, one can be an effective teacher in propagating the gospel from house to house (Acts 5:42; 20:20). This writing is designed to point outsome of the requirements needed in order to teach in personal evangelism. Teaching is serious businessfor the teacher comes under "heavier judgment" (James 3:1-2). Churches of our Lord need more andmore individuals to take an interest in personal evangelism. But at the same time, they should do so with full recognition of the fearful responsibilities resting upon those who teach. What are some of the requirements for teaching in cottage meetings ?

THE TEACHER MUST HAVE THE

RIGHT ATTITUDE

Right attitude must begin with oneself. There should be a willingness on the part of the teacher to make preparation for the greatest of all tasks. Just as Jesus selected twelve men and spent months training them for their work, so training and preparation should become a part of the personal worker's life. At times this may become tedious. It is often accompanied with discouragements. But nothing should dishearten the teacher.

Preparation should include such things as basic rudiments of teaching, a thorough study of the first principles of the oracles of God, and a desire to acquire experience in the word of righteousness (Heb.5:11-14). There is no greater way to "study to show thyself approved of God" than in preparing to teach others (II Tim. 2:15). It is not necessary to commit volumes of information to memory. Knowing how torightly divide God's Word is by far more important than tedious hours of memorization. After all, theteacher does not wish to impress the prospect withhis personal abilities. His goal is to convert the sinner to Christ! When one prepares properly and appropriately, feelings often described as "buck fever" and "stage fright" are eliminated. Confidence andassurance in oneself is produced. The teacher with aBible and no knowledge as to how to use it is muchlike a young intern with a satchel of tools and no experience in the use of them. Who would trust oneself in the hands of such a person ?

In addition to preparation, the teacher should de

sire to develop patience. This is a vital characteristic

for two reasons: (1) Due to many failures and dis

appointments, there are times when discouragements

are great. Patience will help one not to "give up and

quit." (2) It will greatly aid one's relationship to the

prospect. A teacher should learn never to strive with

his prospect (II Tim. 2:23-26). He should not allo

unimportant matters to dominate the cla . It is not

the function of the tutor to brow-beat the prospect,

nor deal in trivialities. The teacher is to bear witness

for truth in the courtroom of the world. He is to

make arguments in contending for the faith, while

at 'the same time avoiding the alienation of the pros

pect's heart (Jude 3). The teacher should not act as

judge and jury, nor pass out sentences upon the pros

pect. Judgment belongs to God (Rom. 2:16). Be pa

tient with your prospect at all times. You can do this

only if you have the proper attitude toward him.

Then there is one's attitude toward the lost. If the

compa ion and love for the lost does not reside in

the heart, then the most important, compelling force

is absent. Without it, one will never win souls (John

Page 13

15:13). One would do well to ponder the principles of Ezekiel 3:16-2]. In every bodily temple, there is asoul that will spend eter nity either in heaven or hell. Woe unto that one who refuses to warn the wicked of his way! Try to place yourself in the position of the lost, and as you do so, think of your own relationship to the L or d. Would you be a Chr istian today if someone in times past had not shown an interest in you ?

THE TEACHER MUST BE ALERT TO DISCOVER

POSSIBILITIES

In order to keep a well-planned cottage meetingpr ogr am moving onwar d and upwar d, the teacher should always be alert to discover the many possibilities that lie before him. It is not the lack of opportunities that cause failure, but negligence with reference to those opportunities that present themselves. T he teacher should be keeping in mind at alltimes the progress of any prospect with whom hemay be in contact. T his should be done with a viewtowar d setting up a study with him at a futur e date. A good teacher always knows ahead of time where he plans to have his next study. More will be said about this particular point later in this series of articles. However, alertness does not end with seeking out prospects. Possibilities with reference to improving the class in pr ogr ess, and even making thelessons more applicable would also be included. One's relationship to the prospect is another area demanding attention. All of this requires constant alertness.

THE TEACHER MUST HAVE THE PROPER MOTIVE IN MIND

The immense value of teamwork is seen in the example of the disciples of the Lord going out "two by two" (Luke 10:1-11). Team work offers exper ience and training to those who wish to learn more about this type of work. T he skilled teacher can do much in this direction by having the less experienced accompany him in his work. Five teams working inthis manner can soon develop five other teams. In addition to developing teachers by giving them actual experience, there is the "moral support" factor. Also many a teacher has been helped out of a "pinch" by the companion whose knowledge came in handyat the right time. In case of illness, or some other factor, the assistant car always fill in and keep theclass moving. A wor d of caution is appr opr iate at this point. Be sure to have a clear understanding as to which of the two will teach, avoid disagreements in the presence of the prospect, and have a perfect under standing as to the function of each member of the team. Failure to abide by these simple rules results in confusion which could ver y well destroy the confidence which the prospect has in the teacher. This could lead to the prospect's complete rejection of truth.

CONCLUSION

Do you believe that the gospel is the power of God to save sinners? (Rom. 1:16-17). Is it your personal conviction that you have an obligation to teach people the truth and win them to Jesus? If so, do more than merely talk about personal work (James 1:22;Rev. 22:14; Matt. 28:18-19). Go to work now. Mayyour soul find no r est until you have done all you can do to lead someone to Christ. If the world is to be converted to Jesus, it will have to begin at home bypeople like you and me. We can do it, but there will have to be a starting place. T he starting place is the sinner friend nearest you and the time is now. "Hethat winneth souls is wise" (Prov. 11:30).

WHERE ARE YOU?

William C. Sexton

2718 Renick, St. Joseph, Mo. 64507

November 27 through December 2 last year, Ipreached in a meeting for the congregation meetingat 1031 3rd Ave. in Grinnell, Iowa. These brethren stand for the truth on Institutionalism and Centralized Control. They have experienced some very disturbing times over the last few years. There seems to be some very sincere and dedicated people in thiscongr egation. T hey ar e looking for a sound man towork with them. They can only partially support him. As far as I know these brethren and one other group are the only ones in the state set to defend the FAITH once delivered. Can you assist them?

I would like to hear from any sound brethren inthe following areas: northwest Missouri, northeast Kansas, southwest Iowa, and southeast Nebraska. Surely, there are brethren in these areas who are concerned about standing for the truth of God's word, and are aware of the disturbing and disrupting forces at work among God's people today. We are seeking those who are aware of these things andhave the courage to stand up and oppose them.

I can assist some small groups in these areas, ifthey need me. I could hold some short meetings or conduct some Bible Studies this spring and summer. I shall give Bible authority for all that I teach andpractice, and shall ask for such from all. If I can help call me — 816-Ad 3-3214.

T he congr egation at 10th and L incoln her e in St.Joseph is having good attendance this year. We trust that it shall continue, and we shall see men andwomen obeying their L or d in baptism, along withothers growing in grace and knowledge of the Lord.

I preached for the congregation meeting at 1802Jackson Street in Beatrice, Nebraska, February 7.These brethren are small in number, but strong in determination to stand for the truth. They meet inthe basement of brother R. C. Richardson's house. These brethren are looking for someone to work with them. Anyone interested should write brother Richardson. I urge any brethren in this state who are concerned about standing for the pure word of God, tomeet and wor ship with them; study the pr oblems that are facing God's people today. They are askingmen and women in that area to "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." (I Thess. 5:21). T hey meet for their mid-week service Tuesday at 7:00

p.m. They would appreciate anyone coming and investigating the things they preach and practice. Beatrice is some 50 miles from Lincoln, and there seems to be a few there who will stand for the truth. Wher e ar e you? Can you help? Your ser vices wouldbe appr eciated!

In an article of the Gospel Advocate, of August 13,1964, Ross W. Dye urged "organized efforts by thchurch to meet the needs of men." The article went on to name the needs of men as being related to"crime, divorce, hunger, child care, unwed mothers,juvenile delinquency and numerousother problems."

In "social gospel" terms of reference, "the church" means all of the local churches of Christ the world over — the universal church. Hence, organized effort on the part of the universal church would mean thefounding of some institution which could co-ordinate the efforts of all of the local churches of Christ, since the New Testament furnishes no pattern for such organized effort. The largest and only organized unitof the church of Christ according to the New Testament pattern is the local congregation. Its elders are limited to oversight of "the flock of God which is among you" (I Pet. 5:2), leaving no authorization for any eldership to oversee any person or activityoutside their own congregation. Since the elders compose the only overseeing power in the church, anthey are limited to their own congregation, who is to direct this new system of "organized efforts?" Is Ross Dye suggesting that we leave the New Testament pattern and organize something foreign to theNew Testament?

Consider the following: the above-stated "needs of men" are every one a result of disregard for God's Word. "Crime" is violation of civil law, which manmust be subject to (Romans 13). "Divorce" stems from violation of God's law (Mt. 19:9), even wheobtained on the grounds of unfaithfulness allowable by the Scripture. "Hunger" results when men willnot work to have to give to the needy (Eph. 4:28).

"Child care" is necessary only when children are abandoned by those responsible for them (I Tim. 5:8-16). "Unwed mothers" are sinners who have committed fornication and must reap what they havesowed (I Cor. 6:16-18; Gal. 6:7). "Numerous other problems" arise from disregard for God's Word. Ifthis seems to be an over-simplification, just ponder it a while.

Now, to boil Brother Dye's proposal down to its unsightly dregs, here is what we have: he was advocating in the Advocate that churches of 'Christ should violate God's Word by organizing human institutions through which to activate the church universal so as to meet the needs of men which result from violations of God's Word. According to his standard, violations of God's Word create a need for further violation of God's Word; and by further violation oGod's Word, he hopes to remedy the former violations of God's Word. Verily,, this is the modern, social gospel way for Satan to cast out Satan!

"Back to the Bible!" "Back to Jerusalem!" "Back to a thus saith the Lord!" "We speak where the Bible speaks and ar e silent wher e the Bible issilent!"

We recognize the foregoing expressions and slogans as having been a vital part of the restoration movement. These slogans are good because they are scriptural. The scripture authorizing these is found in I Peter 4:11a and is thus stated: "If any manspeak, let him speak as the oracles of God.. ." Wemight say that this was the battle cry of the pioneers who fought sectarianism relentle ly in their efforts to restore the church of Christ in its ancient purity.

THANKS FOR YOUR RENEWAL

We express our sincere appreciation to you for promptly renewing your subscription to Searching The Scriptures. We are especially grateful to all of you who sent in four extra subscriptions with your own. This helps us reach more people with the study of God's Word. If you have not yet sent in your renewal, please do so today. And if you will, send four subscriptions with your own for only $10.00.

Because they occupied a position of truth they were not afraid to challenge error in its own citadels. Theycalled for unconditional surrender to the King oKings. Under such conditions the church of our Lord grew both in spirit and in number.

It is sad to observe in our generation that the battle cry has been diluted by the ideas of vain-glorious men from within the body of Christ. What has happened to the proclaimers of our day? Is the plea "we speak where the Bible speaks" no longer effective and true ? Is it any less needed now ? Has error been completely overthrown except for a few minor skirmishes? Is it just po ible that some can no longer use the slogan because they no longer "speak as the oracles of God" ?

It is evident that in many places today that thlatter is true. What has started some on this digressive pathway? On every hand we hear the boast of how the church has grown. It is true that a goonumber of baptisms are taking place. But the members are very often not taught to "observe all things" commanded of the Lord. As a result, we are overstocked with spiritually underfed church members who in turn go out to convert others to this sickly state of affairs only to make the church weaker and weaker.

Little or no consideration is given in some quarters today as to whether a thing is scriptural or not.Some even dare to suggest a laxity in God's plan permitting us to operate without a pattern. We need to get back to our plea to "speak as the oracles of God." We are in dire need of preaching again thepure gospel of Christ with the Jerusalem ring to itAgain we need to remember that it is the gospel oChrist that is the power of God unto salvation — nothing more and nothing less (Romans 1:16). Some today try to "hot-dog" folks into the church, some try to "ping-pong" them in, some try to "youthcamp" them in, some try to "prestige" them in, some try to "gimmick" them in with their "slides of theholy land," and on and on we go with the devices of men. When all this is done it is still the gospel which,when believed and obeyed (Heb. 5:9) , will save the souls of men. Let us not be afraid of being "oldfashioned" when we say "we speak where the Biblespeaks" but when we say it, above all, let it be true.

BOOKS BY W. CURTIS PORTER

Quibbles That Backfired— Contains three sermons at Florida College several years ago. These are outstanding denominational arguments that Porter turned on his opponent He had a large number of debates with all sorts of false teachers.

Price — $1.00

Sermon Outlines, Volumes I & II — Sermon outlines W. Curtis Porter used through the years of his preaching.

Price — $2.00 Set of 2 vols. — $3.75

W. W. OTEY, CONTENDER FOR THE FAITH

A history of controversies in the church of Christ from 1860-1960

by Cecil Willis

A biography of one of the greatest gospel preachers of this century — William Wesley Otey. A well documented book with some of the most pertinent and important information bearing on the present issue in the church today and its development through the years.

425 pages $4.00

Order From

PHILLIPS PUBLICATIONS

P. O. Box 17244Tampa, Florida 33612